ED 35 Educational Research Quiz Review

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/25

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering key research concepts, paradigms, ethical principles, variable types, and review models from the ED 35 quiz notes.

26 Terms

1
New cards

Empirical Research

Research based on systematic, observable evidence collected from primary or secondary datasets, featuring a Methodology section and Results.

2
New cards

Theoretical / Conceptual Articles

Articles that synthesize existing theories, propose analytical models, or provide philosophical critique without collecting empirical data.

3
New cards

Systematic Review

A qualitative synthesis of prior studies.

4
New cards

Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Prospective ethical review prior to data collection focused entirely on protecting human research subjects and minimizing risk.

5
New cards

Academic Peer Review

Retrospective evaluation of a finished manuscript by independent scholars to assess methodology, rigor, and scholarly contribution.

6
New cards

Respect for Persons (Belmont Report)

Principle requiring voluntary, fully informed consent without deception, acknowledging individual autonomy.

7
New cards

Beneficence (Belmont Report)

The ethical obligation to 'do no harm' and maximize potential benefits while minimizing research risks.

8
New cards

Justice (Belmont Report)

Ensuring a fair and equitable distribution of research burdens and benefits across populations.

9
New cards

Coercion vs. Undue Influence

Coercion involves a threat of penalty to compel participation; undue influence involves an excessive, irresistible reward.

10
New cards

Research Hierarchy Progression

The logical funnel: Topic -> Problem -> Gap -> Question -> Finding.

11
New cards

Problem

A problem exists in real-world educational practice.

12
New cards

Creswell's 5-Part Model for Quantitative Reviews

  1. Introduction, 2. Review of IVs, 3. Review of DVs, 4. Studies linking IV to DV, 5. Articulation of research gap.
13
New cards

Postpositivism Paradigm

Deterministic stance assuming an objective reality approximated probabilistically; uses quantitative experiments and hypothesis testing.

14
New cards

Constructivism Paradigm

Stance holding multiple, socially constructed realities where meaning is negotiated; uses qualitative interviews and inductive themes.

15
New cards

Pragmatism Paradigm

Stance that truth is 'what works' to solve practical problems; uses mixed methods combining qualitative and quantitative tools.

16
New cards

Transformative Paradigm

Research intertwined with politics and social action to confront power imbalances and systemic oppression.

17
New cards

Deductive Reasoning (Top-Down)

Existing theory leads to hypotheses, empirical observation, and confirmation/rejection; primary domain of quantitative inquiry.

18
New cards

Inductive Reasoning (Bottom-Up)

Raw observations lead to pattern recognition, tentative hypotheses, and emergent theory; primary domain of qualitative inquiry.

19
New cards

Nominal Variables

Categorical or qualitative labels without mathematical order, magnitude, or rank (e.g., college major, race).

20
New cards

Ordinal Variables

Ranked categories with a sequential order, but unequal intervals between points (e.g., Likert scales, class standing).

21
New cards

Continuous Variables

Numeric measurements along an unbroken mathematical continuum with equal units (e.g., GPA, income).

22
New cards

Primary Data

Data collected first-hand for the current study.

23
New cards

Pearson's r Correlation Properties

Ranges from −1.00-1.00 to +1.00+1.00. Sign shows direction, magnitude shows strength. Correlation does not imply causation.

24
New cards

Meta-Analysis

A quantitative synthesis pooling statistical effect sizes.

25
New cards

Secondary Data

Previously gathered data re-analyzed.

26
New cards

Gap

Exists in published scholarly literature.