1/109
Looks like no tags are added yet.
cancer development
is usually a timely process that can take decades, strong evidence that cancer takes a long time to develop after the initial mutational events came from the association between lunger cancer and smoking
must overcome lots of barrier
tumor formation is a complex process that involved similar biological mechanisms, which can increase when exposed to carcinogens, mutagens, and or tumor promoting stimuli
squamous carcinoma
follows the generalized long-term timline
retinoblastoma and testicular
do not fit the generalized long-term timeline
malignant tumors arise from
pre-malignant growths, tissues with both benign malignant growth co-existing, removal of polys decrease risk of CRC by 60%, repeated surveillance (2.5/1000 growth)
multiple alterations required for progression
analyzed genomes of various stages in colorectal cancer progression, they found a common pattern in the samples analyzed, the majority of sample harbor inactivating mutation in APC (tumor suppressor), genetic and epigenetic changes vary after the initial loss of APC
tumor formation
complex process that involved similar biological and genetic (epigenetic) mechanisms
development and evolution
both used to describe the carcinogenic process
promotion and development
early shows development, cell competition at tissue level within boundaries set by tissue homeostatic control mechanisms (no growth autonomy
progression and evolution
cell competition at single-cell level, growth autonomy and evolutionary drift
does carcinogenesis fit into Darwinian evolution
partially by Johns Hopkins study; limitations are that there is no direct link between genetic change and advantage conferred, epigenetic changes critical to carcinogenesis, rate-limiting steps are hard to identify
dynamic clonal diversification
simple linear clonal expansion vastly oversimplifies the progressive growth of cancer cells during carcinogenesis
mutation rates changing
Darwinian selection might eliminate phenotypically less fit clones through selective pressure
genetic diversity
likely from genetic instability that outpaces selection; clones of cells during expansion aren’t actually a ‘stable’ homogeneous population containing similar genetic alterations, cells that are presumably part of a single clonal population vary greatly in copies of chromosomes
cancer stem cells
complicate the clonal expansion model; they are organized in a hierarchy, stem cells produce progenitor cells which then undergo rapid cell divisions, progenitor cells then differentiate to produce specialized cells in tissues
clonal evolution theory
based on the clonal expansion model of tumorigenesis, individual cells acquire mutations that confers advantages giving rise to clonal populations in the tumor (ALL cells in the clonal population are tumorigenic)
cancer stem cell theory
rooted in the idea that a cancer stem cell population produces all cancer cells, the resultant cancer cell population is highly heterogenous however is unable to self-renew (ONLY the cancer stem cells are truly tumorigenic)
cancer stem cell hypothesis
only cancer stem cells have self-renewal and tumorigenic capabilitiest
tumorspheres
cancer stem cells usually form these in culture and express stem cell specific antigens
are all cells in a growing mass tumorigenically equivalent
select cells that express antigens present in cancer stem cells from rest of tumor cell population, test for tumor formation in immunocompromised mouse model, cancer stem cells form tumors while general tumor cell population doesn’t
why are cancer stem cells clinically important
more resistant to chemotherapy and radiation, more resistant to checkpoint immunotherapies, can generate phenotypically distinct populations independent of genetic diversification, most recent experimental evidence suggests that cell populations in tumor collaborate rather than compete
unlocking phenotypic plasticity
altered differentiation potential potential in cancer cells including de-differentiation and trans-differentiation
nonmutational epigenetic reprogramming
certain stimuli induce epigenetic plasticity that allows cells to sample alternate chromatin or transcriptional states, a subset of which confer fitness and are maintained through cell division
senescent cells
senescent altered secretory phenotypes, tumor promotion by senescent cells in microenvironments
increase glucose
cancer cells do this from their environment and utilize fermentation more than oxidative phosphorylation
warburg effect
the use of aerobic glycolysis by cancer cells
three modes of carbohydrate metabolism
glycolytic phenotype, OXPHOS phenotype, combined phenotype
glycolytic phenotype
aerobic glycolysis, high glucose/low O2 consumption, high lactate production, high proliferation, low mitochondrial function
OXPHOS phenotype
oxidative phosphorylation, high O2 consumption, low lactate production, low proliferation, high mitochondrial function
combined phenotype
transitional, high glycolysis/OXPHOS, high metastatic ability, high plasticity
increase glucose transport
GLUT1 glucose transported, increase GLUT1 in membrane, Ras src and myc increased expression of GLUT1, PI3K pathway increased GLUT1 and translocation of GLUT1
increased glucose uptake
provides mechanisms for visualizing tumors, glucose-2 deoyglucose replace OH with radioactive fluorine (which can be detected by PET scanner)
cancer cells highly express M2
isoform of pyruvate kinase, ATP not only focus, nucleotides (protein synthesis, other macromolecules), pyruvate kinase (forms pyruvate in last stem)
M1 isoform
highly catalytically active tetramers
M2 isoform
mostly dimers, not very active, builds up intermediates used to make other stuff
lactate alters
the tumor microenviroment, not just a product of glycologsis, decreases pH or acidifies enviroment, decreases function of immune cells that target cancer cells, increases macrophages that pro-tumorigenic properties, ste
altered amino acid metabolism
glutamine is a critical amino acid for cancer cells, cancer cells mimic wound healing which both increases glutamine in cell, increase glutamine transport by myc, glutamine intermdiate in the citric acid cycle, glutathione is an antioxidant
cancer cells have mechanisms
to transport nutrients from extracellular space
altered lipid metabolism
high rates of lipid synthesis and lipid uptake in cancer cells, lipid signaling molecules (promote inflammation, invasion, formation of blood vessels, MUFA/PUFA (unsaturated fatty acids) in cell membranes, increase membrane saturation (plasma membrane) increase cholesterol (increases rigidity, decreases permeability, decreases oxidative stress)
carcinogensis also influenced by
organismal metabolic regulation, obesity/type 2 diabetes (critical risk factors for cancer)
no IGF-1
almost never get cancer, pro-survival/bio-synthesis, regulated by food intake
DNA repair pathways
often mutated in cancer cells, mutations in DNA repair proteins increases genomic instability, genome instability increases mutation rate, increases mutation rate increases the probability of a cell acquiring mutations required to overcome barriers to malignancy
structure of DNA
permits replication and transciption
DNA provides instructions
for making RNA and proteins that ulimtately drive phenotype and function
all DNA bonds are
covalent, except between the bases (hydrogen bonds)
bases are
inward facing, provides some protection from mutation, still susceptible to modification from exogenous and endogenous sources
DNA replication
mis-incorporation of bases, incorporation of chemically-altered bases, double-stand break repair (doesn’t just happen during replication)
spontaneous chemical changes
deamination of DNA bases, hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds connecting nucleobases to backboned, depurination depyrimidination leading to abasic sites
chemical changes induces by mutagenic agents
ROS produced by normal cells metabolism, exogenous agents (X-rays, UV rays, alkylating agents), ROS and NOS produces by carcinogens, reactive species produced by inflammations
DNA polymerases
proof-reading ability is critical line of defense against cancer, around 10^5 nucleotide there is one mistake then exonuclease domain chews up DNA with mistake (10^7 error rate)
mutations in exonuclease domain
can promote cancer because of mutations in DNA polymerases
mouse model
germline mutation in DNA polymerase delta (lagging strand) increase mortality by various cancers
double strand breaks
can occur during DNA replication, single-stranded DNA during replication is susceptible to breaks, single-strand DNA breaks that arise during replication are essentially double stranded DNA breaks, cells have several pathways to repair dsDNA breaks
homology-directed repair
double-strand breaks are repaired by this during S and G2 phases of cell cycle, HDR utilizes the sister chromatid to repair double-strand break (genetically identical), key proteins involved in dsDNA breaks repair includes BRAC1 and BRCA2
mutations in BRAC1 and BRAC2
are associated with increased risk of cancer, germline mutations in BRAC1 or BRAC2 increase risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer before the age of 70 by 50-70%
germline BRAC mutations
associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in males before the age of 65
BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations
70-80% of all familial ovarian cancers
BRCA1 or BRCA2 promoter methylation
20-30% of sporadic breast cancers exhibit loss of function due to this
BRCA1
participates in large multi-protein complexes, disruption leads to abnormalities in S-phase checkpoint, G2/M checkpoint, spindle checkpoint, deficiency can also lead to apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation, facilities end resection, phosphorylates which leads to DNA damage response, indirectly recruit rad51
BRCA1 localizes to sites
of double-strand breaks, hydroxyurea causes replication fork to stall
BRCA2
critical in the recruitment of RAD51 to dsDNA breaks, participates in large multi-protein complexes to regulate cell cycle progression, telomere homeostasis, DNA replication, centrosome duplication and of course genome stability
disruption of BRCA2 in mouse models
leads to extensive chromosomal abnormalities, expression of truncated protein in mice results in a huge increase in chromosomal abnormalities, these chromosomal abnormalities are due to dysfunctional repair of dsDNA breaks
BRCA2 deficiency can also
lead to deregulation of centrosome duplication, multipolar spindles (too many sprindles)
are major threats to DNA
reactive oxygen and nitrogen species
oxidative stress
imbalance between the production of oxidants and their removal by antioxidants, can be induces by aging, inflammatory disease, smoking, drinking, exposure to certain carcinogens
reactive nitrogen species
are released from macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells in response to an inflammatory stimulus
8-oxoguanine
the most common DNA lesion induced by ROS, mispairs with adenine if left unrepaired, can lead to G:C base pair to become a T:A base pair, cells have repair enzymes that recognize and repair with this and it’s mispairing
deamination of 5-methycytosine
can lead to point mutations, is necessary in regulation of gene expression (methylated DNA, repressed transcription), susceptible to spontaneous deamination which converts it into thymine, switches C:G to T:A mutations, estimated that 63% of point mutations in tumors arise in CpG sequences
oxidation of 5-methylcytosine
creases an unstable intermediate that quickly undergoes deamination forming thymine glycol (strongly blocks replication), leads to formation of a highly unstable intermediate product that rapidly undergoes deamination
products of UV radiation
are predominantly pyrimidine dimers
pyrimidine dimers
adjacent pyrimidines become covalently link to each other (CC, CT and TT dimers), block replication and transcription
base excision repair
repairs non-bulky DNA lesion, thymine glycol, 8-oxoguanine G-T mismatches
MUTY
DNA glycosylase that selectively recognizes and repiars 8-oxoG mispairs with adenine
germline mutations in MUTY
associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer
nucleotide excision repair
repairs bulky, helix distorting lesions, bulky base adducts, pyrimidine dimers (transcription-coupled repairs and global genomic repair)
chromosomal instability
contributes to genomic instability in cancer cells, high rate of loss or gain of whole or parts of chromosomes, results from errors in chromosome segregation during mitosis, cause of aneuploidy in cancer cells
multipolar spindles
can also contribute to CIN and aneuploidy, incorrect spindle organization can also lead to mistakes during mitosis and aneuploidy, supernumerary centrosome can lead to mis-segregation of chromosomes, centrosome duplication is closely related with cell cycle progression
merotely
kinetochore attached to 2 spindle fibers, gets stuck in the middle, this process malfunctions in cancer cells which significantly drives aneuploidy, don’t trigger spindle assembly checkpoint
mutator phenotype
normal mutation rates are insufficient to account for the multiple mutations observed in human tumors
heterotypic interactions
communication between different cells maintain normal tissue organization
stromal cells
a wide variety of these populate tumors (fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, endothelial cells, macrophages
reactive stroma
the composition of this surround tumors is vastly different from normal stromal tissue
PDGF
recruits and stimulates proliferation of fibroblasts and convers them to myofibroblasts, cancer cells continuously release this which leads to MMP secretion by myofibroblasts
myofibroblasts release matrix
proteinases that participates in ECM degradation
tumor associated endothelial cells
vasculature of human glioblastoma expresses both CD31 (endothelia cell specific marker) and NCAM (neuroectodermal marker), contain the same genomic alterations as the bulk of cells in the glioblastoma
cancer-associated fibroblasts
facilitate cancer progression, cancer-associated fibroblasts in stroma significantly drive aggressive tumor, promoting proliferation, promoting survival, activating angiogensis
promoting proliferation
ECM remodeling and growth factors
promoting survival
modulating immune cells that infiltrate and escape of immune surveillance
activating angiogenesis
formation new blood vessels
drive angiogenesis
cancer associated fibroblasts
breast cancer cells
mixed with normal mammary fibroblasts or CAFs and injected into immunodeficient mice to xenograft tumors
tumor associated marcophages
appear to promote tumor development, tumor cells secreting numerous substances that recruit immune cells as well, the recruited cells include monocytes which then undergo differentiation into macrophages
density of TAMs plotted versus the density of capillaries
correlation further supports the proposed role that TAMs play in angiogenesis
expression of MMP
by tumor-associated macrophages degrade the extracellular matrix frees up angiogenic factors
angiogensis
process by which new blood vessels are formed from existing vessels
heterotypic interactions required
communication between tumor cells/stroma to active tumorigenesis
blood vessels
cancer cells tend to preferentially grow around blood vessels, p53 stimulates hypoxia-induced apoptosis
pVHL
angiogensis in response to hypoxia regulated by this
hypoxia
proline hydroxylase can’t function, pH regulate glucose transport anaerobic glycoloysis
under hypoxic conditions
HIF-1 and HIF-2 drive expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and other cellular pathways