Evolutionary Medicine, Genetics, and Phenotypic Variation: Key Concepts and Frameworks

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/442

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:01 PM on 9/23/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

443 Terms

1
New cards

Evolutionary medicine (definition)

A discipline combining evolutionary biology and medicine to explain why the body remains vulnerable to disease, using evolutionary biology to inform medicine and disease patterns to advance evolutionary biology.

2
New cards

Proximate explanation

A "how" explanation for a trait.

3
New cards

Ultimate explanation

A "why" explanation for a trait.

4
New cards

Mechanism (Tinbergen, proximate)

The molecular, cellular, or biological mechanism underlying a trait.

5
New cards

Ontogeny (Tinbergen, proximate)

How a trait changes over an organism's lifetime, shaped by genes and experience.

6
New cards

Adaptive value (Tinbergen, ultimate)

Why a trait was built this way and selected for; how it increases fitness.

7
New cards

Phylogeny (Tinbergen's four questions)

The evolutionary history that produced a trait, and its vulnerabilities.

8
New cards

Tinbergen's Four Questions

A framework originally developed for ethology, adapted by evolutionary medicine into two proximate questions (mechanism, ontogeny) and two ultimate questions (adaptive value, phylogeny); complementary, not competing.

9
New cards

Fever - proximate question

How do immune signals alter hypothalamic temperature regulation?

10
New cards

Fever - ultimate question

Why did a costly rise in body temperature evolve, and when might it be protective?

11
New cards

Why fever may be protective

Higher body temperature speeds up white blood cell movement, lymphocyte activation, and cytokine production.

12
New cards

Founders of evolutionary medicine

George Williams (evolutionary biologist) and Randolph Nesse (physician), who formalized the field in the early 1990s.

13
New cards

"Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."

Quote by Theodosius Dobzhansky (1973).

14
New cards

Key framework: what does natural selection maximize?

Reproductive success, NOT health.

15
New cards

Why the strength of selection declines with age

Older individuals contribute less to future generations, so selection is less effective at removing harmful variants that act late in life.

16
New cards

Nesse's quote on reproduction vs. health

"Where there is a conflict between reproductive success and health, reproduction always wins out."

17
New cards

Key framework: "evolution works with what it has"

New adaptations are built on top of ancient, already-constrained biological systems rather than starting from scratch.

18
New cards

Example: "ages of origin" of biological features

Metabolism arose ~3900-1600 Mya; bipedalism arose only ~6 Mya — illustrating how present-day traits are layered on top of ancient ones.

19
New cards

Key framework: disease vulnerability has a deep evolutionary history

Many genes/pathways underlying present-day disease trace back far earlier in the tree of life than the disease itself.

20
New cards

Mismatch hypothesis

Traits that evolved to be advantageous in ancestral environments may no longer be advantageous (or may be harmful) in modern environments.

21
New cards

Examples of proposed "mismatch" diseases

Acid reflux, metabolic syndrome, myopia, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes, gout, and osteoporosis (Gurven & Lieberman 2020).

22
New cards

Axial myopia

Nearsightedness caused by the eye growing too long during childhood, so the focal point of light falls in front of, rather than on, the retina.

23
New cards

Holm (1937) myopia study

Found myopia in only 0.4% of eyes examined among hunter-gatherers in Gabon.

24
New cards

Skeller (1954) myopia study

Found myopia in only 1.2% of eyes examined among Angmagssalik Inuit.

25
New cards

Modern myopia prevalence

The greatest cause of vision impairment globally; nearly half the world's population is projected to be nearsighted by 2050 (Holden et al. 2016).

26
New cards

Young et al. (1969) - pre-schooling generation

Alaskan Eskimos born 1880-1927 (before formal schooling) had only 1.5% myopia prevalence.

27
New cards

Young et al. (1969) - post-schooling generation

Alaskan Eskimos born after formal schools were established in 1932 had 51% myopia prevalence (ages 11-40) — same population, one generation later.

28
New cards

"Retina-defocus" hypothesis (myopia)

The eye grows to match the focal plane of images hitting the retina; defocused signals from near/close objects induce axial elongation via a feedback loop.

29
New cards

"Indoor light" hypothesis (myopia)

Reduced outdoor light exposure (more time indoors) promotes eye elongation and myopia; more outdoor light is protective.

30
New cards

Quiz: does natural selection eventually eliminate traits that harm health?

No — selection acts on reproductive fitness, not health, so a trait that hurts health can persist if it doesn't reduce reproduction.

31
New cards

Quiz: why does the rapid rise in myopia (to >50% within ~1 generation) support a mismatch explanation?

The increase happened far too quickly to be explained by genetic evolution, pointing to environmental/lifestyle change instead.

32
New cards

Quiz: which fever question is "ultimate"?

"Why did a costly increase in body temperature evolve, and under what conditions might it be beneficial?" (the "how do immune signals raise temperature" question is proximate).

33
New cards

Phenotype

An observable or measurable characteristic of an organism.

34
New cards

Health and disease as phenotypes

Health and disease are themselves phenotypes, which is why evolutionary medicine needs to explain why phenotypic variation exists.

35
New cards

Quantitative genetics

The study of how genetic and environmental variation contribute to variation in phenotypes within populations.

36
New cards

Molecular genetics

The study of the specific genes, genetic variants, and molecular mechanisms that produce phenotypes.

37
New cards

Mendelian trait

A trait controlled by one or a few genetic loci with dominant and recessive alleles, where the dominant allele masks the recessive allele's effect.

38
New cards

Additive genetic effect

Each allele contributes independently to a phenotype; the heterozygote is typically intermediate between the two homozygotes.

39
New cards

Genetic architecture of most human phenotypes

Quantitative, continuous, complex, and largely additive/polygenic (not simple Mendelian traits).

40
New cards

Francis Galton - contributions

Studied continuous traits like height using resemblance among relatives; pioneered correlation and regression toward the mean; helped found quantitative genetics.

41
New cards

Francis Galton - eugenics

Also founded the eugenics movement, applying ideas about heredity to selective human reproduction, with major harmful scientific and social consequences.

42
New cards

Genetic determinism

The idea that a person's life situation is determined by genetics rather than environment/experience/social inequity — historically used to justify slavery, colonialism, and racism.

43
New cards

R.A. Fisher's variance equation

Vp = Vg + Ve

44
New cards

Vp (Fisher's equation)

Phenotypic variance; the total variation observed in a trait.

45
New cards

Vg (Fisher's equation)

Genetic variance; differences caused by genetic variation between individuals.

46
New cards

Ve (Fisher's equation)

Environmental variance; differences caused by environment (nutrition, stress, disease, education, climate, etc.).

47
New cards

R.A. Fisher - eugenics

Like Galton, Fisher was also a prominent supporter of eugenics.

48
New cards

Broad-sense heritability (H²)

The proportion of phenotypic variance due to ALL genetic variance combined.

49
New cards

Components of broad-sense heritability

Additive effects (alleles add independently), dominance (effects depend on allele combos at the same locus), and epistasis (effects depend on interactions between different loci).

50
New cards

Narrow-sense heritability (h²)

The proportion of phenotypic variance due specifically to ADDITIVE genetic variance (VA).

51
New cards

What narrow-sense heritability predicts

How well offspring resemble their parents, and how a population will respond to selection.

52
New cards

Why narrow-sense heritability matters for disease evolution

Disease-related traits can evolve only to the extent that relevant phenotypic differences have a heritable (additive genetic) component AND affect fitness.

53
New cards

Estimating heritability with twins

Monozygotic (MZ) twins share ~100% of genetic variation; dizygotic (DZ) twins share ~50% on average; greater similarity in MZ vs. DZ twins is evidence of genetic variance.

54
New cards

Estimating heritability with parent-offspring regression

Comparing average parent phenotype to offspring phenotype; a strong correlation indicates high heritability.

55
New cards

Misconception: heritability = "caused by genes"

False — heritability is a population-level statistic about variance in a specific population/environment, NOT a statement about what fraction of one person's phenotype is "caused by genes."

56
New cards

Misconception: high heritability means environment doesn't matter

False — high heritability does NOT mean the environment is unimportant.

57
New cards

Misconception: low heritability means genes don't matter

False — low heritability does NOT mean genes are biologically unimportant.

58
New cards

Heritability is population/environment-specific

Heritability estimates for the same trait can vary across time and across populations (e.g., shown in millions of Danish twins, Auning et al. 2026); it is not a fixed, universal number.

59
New cards

Genotype × Environment (GxE) interaction

When the effect of a genotype on a phenotype depends on the environment in which it is expressed.

60
New cards

Reaction norm

Describes how a single genotype expresses different phenotypes across varying environmental conditions.

61
New cards

When do reaction norms indicate GxE?

When reaction norms for different genotypes cross (are not parallel).

62
New cards

Phenotypic plasticity

The ability of a single genotype to produce different phenotypes in different environments.

63
New cards

Quantitative trait locus (QTL)

A stretch of DNA statistically associated with differences in a phenotype (e.g., height, blood pressure, disease risk).

64
New cards

Genetic architecture (definition)

The underlying genetic basis of a trait: how many variants affect it, how large their effects are, and how those variants interact.

65
New cards

Monogenic trait

Variation at one gene has a major effect.

66
New cards

Oligogenic trait

A relatively small number of loci contribute important effects.

67
New cards

Polygenic trait

Many loci each contribute small effects; most common complex diseases (blood pressure, obesity, type 2 diabetes, asthma, depression) are polygenic.

68
New cards

Type 1 vs. Type 2 diabetes (genetic architecture)

Type 1 involves fewer loci with relatively larger effects (more oligogenic); Type 2 involves many loci with individually small effects (highly polygenic).

69
New cards

Key takeaway: genes and environment don't simply "add up"

Disease risk is shaped by genetics, environment, AND their interaction (GxE) together; rapid environmental shifts can change disease patterns via plasticity without any genetic (evolutionary) change.

70
New cards

Quiz: what does a heritability of 0.70 mean?

70% of the phenotypic variation in that particular population, at that time, is associated with (additive) genetic differences among individuals — NOT that 70% of any one person's trait is genetic.

71
New cards

Quiz: GxE interaction example

Two genotypes have similar disease risk in environment A, but genotype 1 has substantially higher disease risk than genotype 2 in environment B.

72
New cards

Quiz: genetic architecture of most complex diseases

Most common, complex human diseases are influenced by many genetic variants, each with a relatively small effect (a polygenic architecture).

73
New cards

Evolution (Darwin's definition)

"Descent with modification": inherited traits change over time.

74
New cards

Darwin and the theory of evolution

Formally proposed by Charles Darwin in 1859, though he had been developing the idea since at least 1837.

75
New cards

Evolution (genetic definition)

A change in allele frequency in a population over time.

76
New cards

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

A principle stating that allele and genotype frequencies in a population will remain constant across generations if certain assumptions are met (no mutation, random mating, no gene flow, no drift, no selection).

77
New cards

Violating Hardy-Weinberg assumptions

Means the population may be evolving (allele frequencies may be changing).

78
New cards

Five evolutionary processes that change allele frequencies

Mutation, non-random mating, gene flow/migration, genetic drift, and natural selection.

79
New cards

Mutation (evolutionary process)

The generation of new alleles from one generation to the next (germline or de novo).

80
New cards

How many de novo mutations does each person have?

Roughly 60.

81
New cards

Why mutation changes allele frequencies only subtly

Mutations occur at low frequency, and most are neutral (no fitness effect) or only mildly deleterious, so they don't easily persist or spread.

82
New cards

Mutation and human disease

Most complex diseases are driven by common variants already circulating in the population (polygenic), not single de novo mutations, though de novo mutations can still cause rare disease.

83
New cards

Non-random mating

Individuals are more or less likely to mate with one another than expected by chance, based on their traits or genotype.

84
New cards

Effect of non-random mating

Often alters genotype distributions more than allele frequencies.

85
New cards

Assortative mating

A form of non-random mating in which individuals with similar phenotypes are more likely to mate with each other.

86
New cards

Assortative mating in humans

Weakly documented (e.g., some evidence for height; Robinson et al. 2017), not a major driver of allele frequency change.

87
New cards

Gene flow

Any movement of alleles into or out of a population, via migration or admixture.

88
New cards

Migration (as an evolutionary process)

The movement of individuals from one population to another.

89
New cards

Admixture (as an evolutionary process)

The mixing of previously differentiated populations, resulting in individuals with ancestry from multiple populations.

90
New cards

Effect of gene flow WITHIN a population

Can introduce or reintroduce alleles, increasing genetic variation.

91
New cards

Effect of gene flow BETWEEN populations

Makes distant populations more genetically similar to one another, reducing divergence.

92
New cards

Gene flow and human disease

Human populations are rarely completely isolated, so continual gene flow means there are very few population-specific disease alleles.

93
New cards

Genetic drift

Random changes in allele frequency due to chance ("sampling error") in which alleles are passed to the next generation.

94
New cards

Genetic drift and population size

Random fluctuations in allele frequency are greater in smaller populations.

95
New cards

What genetic drift does to genetic variation

Causes genetic variation to be lost, and can cause initially identical populations to become different from each other over time.

96
New cards

Founder effect

A type of genetic drift where a new colony is started by a few members of the original population, so the new population has only a sample of (reduced) genetic variation.

97
New cards

Serial founder effect in humans

As humans spread across the globe in successive waves, repeated founder events/bottlenecks made genetic drift an important force in human evolutionary history (Henn et al. 2011).

98
New cards

Natural selection (evolutionary process)

Differential survival/reproduction of individuals based on heritable trait differences.

99
New cards

What determines how much phenotypic change selection produces?

Both the strength of selection AND the heritability of the trait.

100
New cards

Selection differential (S)

The difference between the mean phenotype of the whole population and the mean phenotype of individuals who reproduce (e.g., S = 5 cm if population mean height is 170 cm and reproducing individuals' mean is 175 cm).