1/21
scientific theory, biases, pseudoscience, critical thinking principles
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
naieve realism
belief that the way we see the world is precisely as it actually is
scientific theory
explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world
belief perserverance
when we stick to our initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them
hindsight
“i knew it all along” after the fact we tend to think we would have predicted it all along
confirmation bias
when we only seek evidence that supports our hypothesis and neglect/distort contradicting evidence
pseudoscience
claims that seem scientific but aren’t, lacks safeguards against confirmation bias and belief perserverance
lack of self correction when prediction are vauge and unfalsifiable
ad hoc immunizing hypothesis
no predictions that disconfirm , an escape hatch to protect against falsification
overreliance on anecdotes
can’t tell us about cause and effect and often very difficult to verify
apophenia
over-detecting patterns and connections among unrelated or random phenomena, sometimes we find a “signal” or pattern when one dosen’t exsit
ex. seeing a man in the moon
falsifiability
theory generates hypothesis that could be disproved (risky)
NOT all possible outcomes confirm theory
(pt) barnum effect
tendency to accept certain info as true even when it is so vague as to be worthless
bandwagon/appeal to majority
“most people believe…”
ad hominem/against the man
people from some identities have greater authority
false dichtomy/either-or
conclusion is only 1 of 2 options, since 1 is incorrect, the other wins by default
circular reasoning
basing a claim on the same premise worded differently (premises need evidence)
not me
believing we are immune from fallacies, findings, and biases that affect others
ozcam’s razor
the simplier theory is usually better
replicibility
can the results be replicated in other studies?
peer review
ananymous experts determine acceptability for publication
generalizibility
results obtained from a convivence sample also externally valid in other population
basic research
research examining how the mind works
applied research
research examining how we can use basic research to solve real world problems