1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Discontinuous theories of development
Says growth occurs in shifts; “discrete”
Piaget, Erikson, Kohlberg
Continuous theories of development
Development via accumulation; behaviorists, information processors, socioculturalists
Discontinuous vs continuous & legitimacy
Continuous is considered more legitimate in modern psychology; hard to map human development onto concrete phases & cultural biases can play a part. However, discontinuous is not considered illegitimate as a necessity.. look at Tanner’s stages of puberty
Piaget’s Stages of Development
Sensorimotor stage (~0-2 yr)
Object permanence (if object not in vision, still exists) develops
Preoperational stage (~2-7 yr)
Symbolic thinking (cat related to physical cat & photo of cat) develops
Concrete operational stage (~7-11 yr)
Perspective taking (thinking in other’s shoes) + conservation (understanding of volume and mass) develops
Formal operational stage (~12 yr)
Abstract thinking (democracy, justice, virtue, etc) and ability to deal with hypotheticals develops
Kohlberg’s Moral Development
Stages of moral evolution in a person; consists of pre-conventional, conventional and post conventional
Stages of Kohlberg’s Moral Development
Pre-conventional:
Associated w/ children; avoid punishment and promote self-interest
Conventional:
Associated w/ adults and teens; concerned with social esteem and being a “good citizen”, expectations
Post-conventional:
Associated w/ adults; focus on morals and virtue.. a personal moral compass on what is right as well as flexible thinking, obviously affected by culture
Attachment theory
Developed by Bowlby & Ainsworth (1950s), posits that emotional bonds of infants affect how people relate to others, although it is malleable and can change (ex: 30% changed in 4 yrs)
Secure attachment
High consistency and responsiveness; comfortable with connection and trusts caregiver/partner
Anxious attachment
Low consistency and high responsiveness; desires connection but feels uncertain of care
Avoidant attachment
High consistency and low responsiveness; adapts to lack of emotional availability by becoming distant and avoiding closeness
Disorganized attachment
Low consistency & low responsiveness; usually a result of abuse, want to read more on notes to add on
Parenting Style Theory (who created?)
Consists of permissive, authoritative, uninvolved and authoritarian; argues parenting falls into these four categories. Authoritative recommended by experts but also associated with Western bias
Permissive Parenting “Whatever you want”
High responsiveness & high permissiveness; child leads and parent follows essentially
Authoritative Parenting “Let’s discuss this”
High responsiveness & low permissiveness; high expectations and involvement.. maximum use of positive reinforcement and minimum negative reinforcement. Pushes children to do well while being emotionally involved
Uninvolved Parenting “Idc”
High permissiveness and low responsiveness; child basically does what they want with little involvement, parent isn’t trying to please them however
Authoritarian Parenting “I said so!”
Low responsiveness & low permissiveness; parent has high expectations but isn’t emotionally involved per se, high negative reinforcement and low positive reinforcement
Erikson’s Stages of Psychosocial Development
Essentially says that development consists of having existential conflicts to resolve as you develop; ex: “Can I develop close relationships?” related to virtue of love, which would be “capacity for close connection”