1/44
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Cognitive Function
process by which an individual us able to perceive, recognize and understand thoughts and ideas
concentration
language
self regulation
Theory
explains or predicts why a behavior or phenomenon occurs
abstract
have boundaries
predict future observations
constructs, definitions, and propositions that explain it predicts the events/situation
Why are theories important?
Allows us to better understand and predict behavior
identify information needed to design effective intervention
Explains behavior and suggests how to develop effective ways to change behavior
Model
Graphic depiction of a phenomenon
draw on multiple theories
informed by several theory and empirical findings
not always predictive
Can change a model to a theory
Theory Champions
Agreement that using theories to guide preventions is a good thing and can save time and money
If theories are so good, why don’t we always use them?
People can be unaware or intimidated by them.
Some are complex, abstract, and elaborate
They don’t hit every aspect wanted
History of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)
“Social Learning Theory” (SLT): behavior can be learned
A lot of versions of SLT existed
Came from SLT
Social Learning theory
Behavior can be learned
Millar and Dillard (1941)
Bobo Doll experiment: if. you watch someone do something you will copy it (aggression)
Dr. Albert Bandura
4th most frequently cited psychologist (SCT)
Added ideas of reciprocal determinism and self-efficacy to existing SLT
Social Cognitive Theory
Behavior is influenced by human cognition and environmental factors
A person my intend to by active, but various external forces might prevent it
External forced my encourage PA, but a person my still choose not to be active
Major Theoretical Constructs: reciprocal determinism, environmental, situation, behavioral capacity, outcome expectations, outcome expectancies, self control of performance, observational learning, reinforcements and punishments, emotional coping responses, and self-efficacy
Reciprocal Determinism
Dynamic interaction: personal influences (cognition), behavioral influences, and environmental influence
Pervious activity experiences, fitness level, enjoyable activity moderated intensity, safe neighborhood, enjoyable scenery
Intervention strategy: consider multiple wats to promote behavior change, including environmental, skills, and personal change
Envrionment
external factors can affect whether a person is physically active (social/physical environment)
environment provides models for behavior
Intervention strategy: provide opportunities for PA by modifying the environment/incorporating social support support (or both)
Situation
One’s perception of the environment can influence PA behavior (can be real, distorted, or imagined)
Intervention strategy: correct misperceptions and promote healthful norms
Behavioral Capacity
Processing the knowledge and skills necessary to preform a behavior
Intervention strategy: promote mastery learning through skills training
Outcome Expectations
what a person anticipates will happen if they are physically active
can be positive or negative
TRA/TPB = behavioral beliefs
Intervention strategy: model positive outcomes of healthful behavior
Outcome expectancies
Valuve places on given outcome
positive or negative
people will choose to perform the activity they perceive will maximize positive outcomes
TRA/TPS = outcome evaluations
intervention strategy: teach and provide opportunities for goal setting, self-monitoring, problem solving, and self-reward
Observational Learning
People can learn to perform PA behavior by watching the behavior and outcomes of another person
Permits individuals to learn a novel behavior without undergoing tha trial and error process of performing it
Intervention Strategy: offer creditable role models who perform the targeted behavior
Reinforcements and Punishments
responses to a person’s behavior (exercise), either positive or negative, that increases or decreases the likelihood of reoccurrence of behavior
intervention strategy: promote self-initiated rewards and incentives
positive reinforcement
Adding something positive leads to increased exercise
Negative reinforcement
taking away something negative leads to increased exercise
Punishment
Adding something negative because to decreased exercise
Extinction
waking away reinforcement leads to decreased exercise
Emotional coping responses
Strategies or activities that are used by a person to deal with emotional stimuli
too much arousal inhibits learning and performances (inverted U-theory)
Intervention strategy: provide training and practice in problem solving and stress management skills — include opportunities to practice skills in emotional arousing situations
Self-efficacy
confidence a person feels about performing a particular activity, including confidence in overcoming barriers to performing that behavior
Intervention strategy: approach behavior changes in small steps to ensure success
be specific about the desired change
Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Primary mediator of all behavior change is self-efficacy
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Focuses on the extent to which the individual feels she will be successful in performing the desired behavior, given the abilities she possesses and the unique situation she finds herself in
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Situation specific form of self-confidence
-Â Â Â Â Â Â Factors: past performance (largest influence), vicarious experiences, social persuasion, physiological states
Pros and Cons of Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory
Strong support for the role of self-efficacy as a predictor and outcome of exercise behavior
interventions can target the key sources of self-efficacy
Limitations
Best predicts only challenging or novel behaviors
Influences is reduced as exercise becomes habitual or well learned
Advantages
Multi-dimensional
Easily applicable to interventions and clinical work
disadvantages
Tons of constructs makes it hard to empirically test
Hard to get determine which constructs are most important to behavior change
Theory of Reasoned Action (Fishbein and Ajzen)
Behavior intention = key point
Volitional behaviors: first tred to one-time behaviors (i.e. voting)
if you have a strong intention to vote, then you will vote (one-time thing)
Behavioral beliefs
Perceived consequences/outcomes of the behavior
Outcome expectation (SCT)
ex. after lifting, you will have sore muscles
Outcome evaluations
your evaluation of the consequences/outcomes
do you like the outcome or not? is it important to you?
Outcome expectancy (SCT)
ex. you enjoy having sore muscles after lifting
Attitude
Your combination of beliefs that represent a predisposition to reposed
To know someone’s attitude, you have to know their behavioral beliefs and outcome evaluation
ex. positive attitude to lifting
Normative belief
what you think each “other” thinks you should do
ex. “others” think you should go for a walk after class
Motivation to comply
How likely you are to comply with a given “other” or others
ex, motivation to comply is high because “other” knows what they are talking about
Subjective norms
your perception of the social appropriationess of performing a particular behavior
How high of pressure do you have to go for a walk
ex. voting sticker
Behavior