INS 3003 Midterm Exam

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/164

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:52 AM on 10/8/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

165 Terms

1
New cards

Classical realism

Power and security. hard power

2
New cards

State

A political unit with defined territory, a permanent population, a governing authority, and sovereignty recognized by others.

3
New cards

Nation

A group of people with shared culture/identity who believe they have a right to govern their own territory (self-determination).

4
New cards

Country

The territorial part of a state.

5
New cards

Nigeria (state vs nation)

A state but not a nation. It has 200+ ethnic groups, so it is a multinational state.

6
New cards

Civic nation

A nation based on shared citizenship, not ethnicity (example: the US).

7
New cards

Nationalism

Pursuing rights for a nation, at minimum control over its territory. It sets who belongs and what land is "ours."

8
New cards

Patriotism

Loyalty to or pride in your existing state. This is NOT the same as nationalism.

9
New cards

State-building

Creating the legal-political parts of a state: territory, government, sovereignty.

10
New cards

Nation-building

Creating a shared identity: culture, language, history, myth.

11
New cards

Montevideo Convention

Lists what a state needs: territory, population, effective government, and recognition by other states.

12
New cards

Sovereignty

A state has the final say inside its own borders, and other states agree not to override it.

13
New cards

Bodin (1576)

Defined sovereignty as "absolute and perpetual power vested in a commonwealth."

14
New cards

Anarchy (IR)

No authority above states. It does not mean chaos.

15
New cards

Thirty Years' War

1618-1648 Catholic vs. Protestant war in the Holy Roman Empire that led to the Peace of Westphalia.

16
New cards

Peace of Westphalia (1648)

Ended the Thirty Years' War and is linked to the start of the system of sovereign, equal states.

17
New cards

State sovereignty

Claim based on territory: "We control this land."

18
New cards

National sovereignty

Claim based on population: "These are our people."

19
New cards

Sovereignty claims by era

Westphalia, Vienna, and 1945 UN Charter favored the state. Versailles 1919 and the end of the Cold War favored the nation.

20
New cards

Recognition

Other states accepting your claim of sovereignty. It turns a claim into reality.

21
New cards

ISIS (the state that wasn't)

Had territory, people, and government services but was never recognized by any state, so it was not a state.

22
New cards

Sovereignty today

Conditional, not absolute. Non-state actors, cross-border flows, and shared sovereignty (WTO, climate deals) limit it.

23
New cards

Fragile States Index

Fund for Peace ranking of state fragility (0-120). A higher score means more fragile.

24
New cards

Most vs. least fragile (FSI 2024)

Somalia is most fragile. Norway is least fragile.

25
New cards

Somalia and Al-Shabaab

Drought and weak government made Somalia fragile. Al-Shabaab provides services the state can't, which hurts government legitimacy.

26
New cards

Threat multiplier

Something (like climate change) that makes existing problems, such as conflict, worse.

27
New cards

"A World Adrift" (FSI)

The US-led rules-based order is weakening. Shocks fuel populism and authoritarianism, which cause more instability.

28
New cards

Rules-based order

Post-WWII system built on multilateralism, norms, collective security, and trade interdependence.

29
New cards

Power (capability view)

Power is what you have: military, economy, population, resources.

30
New cards

Power (relational view, Dahl)

Power is getting someone to do what they otherwise wouldn't.

31
New cards

Nye's three ways to get what you want

Coercion (stick), payment (carrot), attraction.

32
New cards

Hard power

Coercion plus payment.

33
New cards

Soft power

Getting others to want what you want through attraction.

34
New cards

Three sources of soft power

Culture (when attractive), values (attractive and consistently practiced), policies (seen as legitimate and inclusive).

35
New cards

Smart power

Combining hard and soft power wisely. Coined by Nye in 2003.

36
New cards

Contextual intelligence

The skill of knowing which tool (hard or soft) fits the situation.

37
New cards

Three-dimensional chess (Nye)

Top: military (unipolar). Middle: economic (multipolar). Bottom: transnational issues, with power spread out.

38
New cards

Limits of soft power (Nye)

Hollywood didn't change North Korea's nukes, and the Taliban needed hard power in 2001.

39
New cards

Cold War smart power

Military deterred the USSR while ideas, consumer goods, and VOA radio weakened it from inside.

40
New cards

Peace Corps

Kennedy-era program (1961) to send Americans abroad to build understanding. Seen as soft power.

41
New cards

USAID

US aid agency founded in 1961. Closed July 1, 2025 and folded into the State Department.

42
New cards

Fulbright Program

Exchange program started in 1946. 160+ countries have taken part.

43
New cards

Hallyu (Korean Wave)

South Korea's government-backed cultural export strategy (K-pop, K-dramas) since 1998.

44
New cards

US soft power model

Ideological (liberal democracy) and driven by private culture (Hollywood, brands). Weakness: values vs. practice gap.

45
New cards

China soft power model

Pragmatic and economic: Confucius Institutes, state media, scholarships, visible infrastructure.

46
New cards

Where China's soft power works

Works in the Global South. Weak in the West because of authoritarian image and "Wolf Warrior" diplomacy.

47
New cards

Transactionalism

A relationship based only on benefits received. China's risk: appeal disappears if the benefits stop.

48
New cards

Soft-power coexistence (Repnikova)

US and China aren't in a zero-sum contest. Many countries see both as appealing.

49
New cards

Mazarr's main claim

Great powers win long-term through societal strengths, not just military or economic might.

50
New cards

Mazarr's seven traits

Ambition, shared opportunity, national identity, active state, effective institutions, learning/adaptation, diversity/pluralism.

51
New cards

Balance (Mazarr)

The traits must stay balanced. Too much of any one can become a weakness (example: too much ambition leads to overreach).

52
New cards

Foucauldian power

Power is produced and works through everyday life. It is "capillary," not just held by states.

53
New cards

Panopticon

Foucault's idea: being watched makes people police themselves.

54
New cards

Juridical model of power

The "king's story": power as sovereign authority. Foucault says it's incomplete.

55
New cards

Foucault's state-level examples

IAEA inspections, treaty monitoring, credit ratings, election observers.

56
New cards

Hard, soft, smart in one line

Hard gets compliance, soft gets agreement, smart knows which to use.

57
New cards

Explanatory theory

Explains what causes what in the world as it is.

58
New cards

Constitutive theory

Argues theory helps create reality. Our categories shape the world.

59
New cards

Global IR critique (Acharya and Buzan)

IR was built by Europeans to explain European events but treated as universal.

60
New cards

Chinese tributary system

A hierarchical (not anarchic) order with one center and subordinate states paying tribute.

61
New cards

Aberystwyth chair (1919)

First IR academic chair (Woodrow Wilson Chair). Zimmern was first holder, E.H. Carr the fourth.

62
New cards

Congress of Vienna (1815)

Post-Napoleon settlement creating a multipolar balance among five great powers. Metternich was the architect.

63
New cards

Symmetrical vs. asymmetrical balance

Symmetrical: roughly equal rivals, so war is risky. Asymmetrical: one side stronger, so weaker states ally.

64
New cards

Imperialism vs. colonialism

Imperialism: annexing distant territory by force. Colonialism: settling your own people there.

65
New cards

Berlin Conference (1884-85)

European powers divided Africa without African representatives.

66
New cards

Treaty of Versailles (1919)

Ended WWI. Germany was excluded, blamed (Article 231), owed 132 billion gold marks, and had its military capped.

67
New cards

League of Nations

Post-WWI organization with no enforcement power. Failed to stop aggression.

68
New cards

UN Charter (1945)

Signed June 26, 1945 by 50 nations. Great powers got a Security Council veto.

69
New cards

NATO vs. Warsaw Pact

NATO (1949): Western alliance led by the US. Warsaw Pact (1955): Soviet-led response.

70
New cards

MAD

Mutually Assured Destruction. Both sides had nukes, so using them meant mutual destruction.

71
New cards

Belavezha Accords (1991)

Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus dissolved the USSR.

72
New cards

Hegemonic stability theory

One dominant power can make the system more stable by enforcing the rules.

73
New cards

Classical realism

Theory that states seek power and security because human nature is fixed and anarchy has no higher authority.

74
New cards

Four realist assumptions

State is the main actor, unitary, rational, and focused on security.

75
New cards

Thucydides

Athenian general-historian who wrote about the Peloponnesian War. Believed human nature stays the same.

76
New cards

Melian Dialogue

416 BC: Athens demands neutral Melos submit. Athens argues justice only exists between equals. Melos refuses and is destroyed.

77
New cards

"The strong do what they can..."

"...and the weak suffer what they must." Classic realist idea from the Melian Dialogue.

78
New cards

Realist vs. critical reading of Melos

Realist: Athens speaks for Thucydides. Critical: Thucydides shows Athenian arrogance leading to the Sicilian disaster.

79
New cards

Hobbes (Leviathan)

Without government, life is "nasty, brutish, and short." No world Leviathan exists, so states stay in anarchy.

80
New cards

Hobbes's three causes of conflict

Gain (competition), diffidence (fear/distrust), glory (reputation).

81
New cards

Morgenthau

Classical realist. Politics is shaped by unchanging human nature, and interest is defined as power.

82
New cards

Morgenthau's key principle

Interest defined as power. Power is the measuring stick for foreign policy.

83
New cards

Relative gains

How much you gain compared to others. Realists care about this most.

84
New cards

Absolute gains

How much you gain, period. Liberals focus on this.

85
New cards

Security dilemma

One state's effort to be safe makes others feel less safe, so everyone arms up even if nobody wants war.

86
New cards

John Herz

Coined the term "security dilemma" in 1950.

87
New cards

Jervis (security dilemma)

The dilemma is worse when offense has the advantage and defensive and offensive weapons look alike.

88
New cards

Glaser: greedy vs. insecure state

Greedy state wants more than security (deterrence works). Insecure state only wants safety but looks aggressive (deterrence alone can backfire).

89
New cards

Waltz (neorealism)

Explains state behavior by the structure of the international system, not by leaders or human nature.

90
New cards

Reductionist theory (Waltz)

Explaining outcomes by looking inside states (leaders, human nature) instead of the system.

91
New cards

Waltz's three parts of structure

Ordering principle (anarchy), character of units (all alike), distribution of capabilities (the part that changes).

92
New cards

Self-help

With no authority to protect them, states rely on themselves for survival.

93
New cards

Internal vs. external balancing

Internal: build your own military. External: form alliances.

94
New cards

Bandwagoning

Joining the stronger or threatening state instead of opposing it.

95
New cards

Defensive vs. offensive realism

Defensive: seek enough power for security; restraint is wise. Offensive: seek more relative power; restraint is naive.

96
New cards

Polarity

How power is distributed. Unipolar (1 power), bipolar (2), multipolar (3+).

97
New cards

Waltz on polarity

Bipolarity is the most stable system.

98
New cards

Gilpin's hegemonic decline

Hegemons decline because empire costs outgrow benefits and the order creates challengers.

99
New cards

Brooks and Wohlforth main claim

Today is "partial unipolarity." The US is still far ahead, so "multipolarity" is a myth.

100
New cards

Partial unipolarity

US is still the top power, but less dominant than right after the Cold War.