Introduction to Logic, Quantifiers, and Proofs

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/18

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary practice flashcards covering definitions, logical connectives, equivalences, quantifiers, and proof terminology.

19 Terms

1
New cards

Proposition

A declarative sentence that is either true (denoted TT or 11) or false (denoted FF or 00), but not both.

2
New cards

Negation

For a proposition PP, the proposition ¬P\neg P which is true when PP is false, and false when PP is true.

3
New cards

Conjunction

The proposition P∧QP \wedge Q formed from propositions PP and QQ, which is true if both PP and QQ are true, and false otherwise.

4
New cards

Disjunction

The proposition P∨QP \vee Q formed from propositions PP and QQ, which is true if at least one of PP or QQ is true, and false otherwise.

5
New cards

Implication

The proposition P⇒QP \Rightarrow Q ("P implies Q"), which is false only when PP is true and QQ is false. If PP is false, the implication is true regardless of the truth value of QQ.

6
New cards

Converse

For a conditional statement P⇒QP \Rightarrow Q, the implication Q⇒PQ \Rightarrow P.

7
New cards

Contrapositive

For a conditional statement P⇒QP \Rightarrow Q, the implication ¬Q⇒¬P\neg Q \Rightarrow \neg P.

8
New cards

Biconditional

The proposition P⇔QP \Leftrightarrow Q ("P is equivalent to Q"), which is true whenever PP and QQ have the same truth value, and coincides with (P⇒Q)∧(Q⇒P)(P \Rightarrow Q) \wedge (Q \Rightarrow P).

9
New cards

Logical Equivalence

Two propositions PP and QQ are logically equivalent (P≡QP \equiv Q) if they share the same truth table, meaning they have the same truth value for every assignment of truth values to their variables.

10
New cards

De Morgan's Laws (Propositional Logic)

The logical equivalences ¬(P∧Q)≡¬P∨¬Q\neg(P \wedge Q) \equiv \neg P \vee \neg Q and ¬(P∨Q)≡¬P∧¬Q\neg(P \vee Q) \equiv \neg P \wedge \neg Q.

11
New cards

Predicate

A declarative statement P(x)P(x) or P(x1,x2,…,xn)P(x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n) about one or more variables whose truth value depends on the value of the variable(s).

12
New cards

Domain

The set of possible values (also called the universe) that a variable can take in a predicate.

13
New cards

Universal Quantifier (∀\forall)

The quantification ∀x∈E:P(x)\forall x \in E : P(x), read as "for all", "for every", or "for each", which is true if P(x)P(x) is true for every element xx in domain EE.

14
New cards

Existential Quantifier (∃\exists)

The quantification ∃x∈E:P(x)\exists x \in E : P(x), which is true if P(x)P(x) is true for at least one element xx in domain EE.

15
New cards

Unique Existential Quantifier (∃!\exists!)

The quantification ∃!x∈E:P(x)\exists! x \in E : P(x), read as "there exists a unique" or "there is exactly one", which is true if P(x)P(x) is true for exactly one element xx in domain EE.

16
New cards

Negation of Quantifiers

The logical equivalences ¬(∀x∈E:P(x))≡∃x∈E:¬P(x)\neg(\forall x \in E : P(x)) \equiv \exists x \in E : \neg P(x) and ¬(∃x∈E:P(x))≡∀x∈E:¬P(x)\neg(\exists x \in E : P(x)) \equiv \forall x \in E : \neg P(x).

17
New cards

Principle of Mathematical Induction

For a family of statements P(n)P(n) where n0∈Nn_0 \in \mathbb{N}, if the base case P(n0)P(n_0) is true and the inductive step P(n)⇒P(n+1)P(n) \Rightarrow P(n+1) holds for every integer n≥n0n \ge n_0, then P(n)P(n) is true for every integer n≥n0n \ge n_0.

18
New cards

Counterexample

An element x0x_0 satisfying the hypothesis P(x0)P(x_0) while violating the conclusion Q(x0)Q(x_0) (satisfying P(x0)∧¬Q(x0)P(x_0) \wedge \neg Q(x_0)), demonstrating that a universal statement ∀x:P(x)⇒Q(x)\forall x : P(x) \Rightarrow Q(x) is false.

19
New cards

Geometric Sum

For k∈Rk \in \mathbb{R} with k≠1k \neq 1 and every n∈Nn \in \mathbb{N}, the identity given by ∑i=0nki=kn+1−1k−1\sum_{i=0}^n k^i = \frac{k^{n+1} - 1}{k - 1}.