1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
what are the functionalist explanations for age inequality
disengagement theory (parsons)
stages of transition (eisenstadt)
role allocation theory (davis and moore)
meritocracy (young)
disengagement theory - parsons
older people actively disengage from some social roles, leaving them for younger people to pick up
allows industrial society to operate using nuclear family where clear roles are defined
criticism of disengagement theory
marxist: castles and kossack
older people do not choose to disengage, but are scapegoated by media and seen as less valuable to society
negative labelling is only functional to ruling class
stages of transition - eisenstadt
children begin to develop independence from family during adolescence
youth culture involves rebellion against parental discipline which can create a transitional culture within youth
benefit in long term
likely to avoid roles needing commitment and maturity during transitional period, donāt reap great economic rewards
criticism of stages of transition
weberian: parkin
inequality is a result of exclusion strategies from older members of society such as lower minimum wage for young people
role allocation theory - davis and moore
young people beginning career, still have to rise up, so paid less
fairly allocated role based on their limited skills/experience
criticism of role allocation theory
marxist: marx
young peopleās low income is the result of capitalist exploitation
they donāt own means of labour therefore become victims of capitalist system, exploited with low pay and bad working conditions
difficult for young people to develop skills which make them functionally unique
meritocracy - young
young and old have less income because they have less merit
young people are less trained, so less skill and deserve less rewards
criticism of meritocracy
marxist: castles and kossack
young people donāt receive appropriate reward compared to skill and effort
ruling class deliberately exclude young people from gaining access to senior roles and wealth
what are the marxist explanations of age inequality
reserve army of labour (castles and kossack)
scapegoating (castles and kossack)
capitalist exploitation (marx)
cultural capital (bourdeiu)
reserve army of labour - castles and kossack
old and young people used as reserve army of labour
state benefits withheld until 25
majority of gig economy are 16 - 30
criticism of reserve army of labour
functionalist: eisenstadt
youth in stages of transition, not willing to commit to a career
scapegoating - castles and kossack
when society is troubled by severe socioeconomic problems, widespread frustration can arise
bourgeoise use elderly as scapegoats, blamed for being needy, drain on society, lack of resources
seen as second class citizens
criticism of scapegoating
functionalist: young
old people lack merit, can be a drain on societal resources once they are out of work and not contributing to the economy
capitalist exploitation - marx
bourgeoise (own means of production) and proletariat (workers)
youth not likely to own means of production, members of proletariat
control superstructure, convincing us that inequalities are natural and youth are less worthy, therefore lower minimum wage justifiable
criticism of capitalist exploitation marx
weber:
two class model oversimplifies differences between workers
some young people own means of production (ben francis, owner of gymshark)
some old people are bourgeoise (lord sugar)
cultural capital - bourdeiu
inequality due to differing levels of cultural capital
old people more likely to be in power, cultural knowledge may be dominant
youth culture may be less valuable in workplace
criticism of cultural capital
postmodernist: berry
digital divide
old people disadvantaged in workplace which is become more digitalised (online meetings etc)
what are the weberian explanations of age inequality
multiple factors of inequality (weber)
dual labour market theory (barron and norris)
usurpation and exclusion strategies (parkin)
divided society (hutton)
multiple factors of inequality - weber
old and youth tend to be ascribed lower power + status in society
less valuable because of cultural stereotypes (china old people seen as valuable, age brings wisdom + experience)
british society youth seen as inexperienced and old seen as vulnerable leading to lower status
criticism of multiple factors of inequality
marxist:
too complicated
de emphasises similarities between workers
dual labour market theory - barron and norris
primary sector: well paying jobs, middle age dominate
secondary sector: poor pay, old and young dominate
very difficult to move from secondary to primary
criticism of dual labour market theory
new right: murray
inadequate parenting has led to culture of dependency in youth
youth in secondary sector because they choose low paid, low skilled part time work
usurpation and exclusion strategies - parkin
social closure explains why old people are blocked from promotions and jobs
exclusion strategy used by groups wanting to protect their privileges so insist certain criteria to restrict people joining
usurpation strategy used to try and grab some privileges of others
criticism of social closure strategies
functionalist: davis and moore
elderly lower position in labour market reflects their lower skill set
youth also do not have the right skills yet
divided 40/30/30 society - hutton
bottom 30%, unemployed,economically inactive , likely to be youth or elderly
30% on zero hour contracts, part time
40% secure jobs, trade unions, middle aged
what are the new right explanations of age inequality
underclass and snowflakes (piers morgan)
the bell curve (murray and herrnstein)
underclass and snowflakes - piers morgan (+dennis and erdos)
young people in todayās society have weaker values than older generation
so earn less
snowflakes: they are self centred, lack resilience and oversensitive
criticism of snowflakes
marxist:
system failure allows young people to be paid less
young given fewer opportunities
young are poorer because they are stuck in a system that exploits them
the bell curve - murray and herrnstein
people born today more divided than previous generations
cognitive elite intermarry and produce children with higher IQ
those with lower IQ struggle parenting and pass lower IQ to children
criticism of the bell curve
marxist: bourdieu
almost impossible to create an IQ test unrelated to cultural capital