1/176
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Energy and number of photons produced by positron annihilation
Two 511 keV photons
Angle between the two annihilation photons
~180° (180° ± 0.25°)
What PET uses instead of a lead collimator
Electronic collimation (coincidence detection)
Line connecting two detectors that register a coincidence
Line of response (LOR)
Typical PET coincidence timing window
~4–12 nanoseconds
Positron range blur of F-18 (RMS)
~0.2 mm
Positron range blur of Rb-82 (RMS)
~2.6 mm
Why long positron range (Rb-82) worsens PET resolution
PET images annihilation site, not decay site
Coincidence event where both unscattered photons from one annihilation are detected
True coincidence
Coincidence event where one or both photons Compton-scatter before detection
Scatter coincidence
Coincidence event from two unrelated annihilations paired by chance
Random (accidental) coincidence
Coincidence event where 3 or more detectors trigger in one window
Multiple coincidence (usually rejected)
Formula for random coincidence rate
R = 2τ × N1 × N2
Randoms scale with injected activity how
With the square of activity
PET prompts formula
Prompts = trues + randoms + scatters
PET delayed window used for randoms estimation
60–100 ns
Corrections applied to PET data
Randoms, attenuation, scatter, dead time, decay
BGO crystal decay time
~300 ns
LSO crystal decay time
~40 ns
NaI(Tl) crystal decay time
230 ns
Light output of BGO relative to NaI
15%
Light output of LSO relative to NaI
75%
PET crystal with the highest stopping power
BGO
PET crystals that enable time-of-flight
LSO and LYSO
Dopant used in LSO, LYSO and GSO crystals
Cerium
Properties of an ideal PET crystal
Dense, high Z, high light output, short decay time
Solid-state PET photodetector replacing PMTs
SiPM (silicon photomultiplier)
What time-of-flight PET measures
Arrival-time difference between the two photons
Modern TOF timing resolution
~450–500 picoseconds
Patients who benefit most from TOF PET
Larger patients
Does TOF replace attenuation correction
No, still needs CT or MR attenuation map
Sensitivity gain of 3-D (septa out) vs 2-D PET
4–6× higher
Scatter fraction in 2-D vs 3-D PET
~10–15% vs ~30–40%
Three fundamental PET resolution limits
Positron range, crystal size, non-collinearity
Non-collinearity blur scales with
Ring diameter
Typical PET vs SPECT spatial resolution
~4 mm vs ~12 mm
PET sensitivity compared to a gamma camera
50–100× more sensitive
PET bore diameter
56–70 cm
PET axial FOV per bed position
15–18 cm
Bed positions for a whole-body PET
5–8
Half-life of C-11
20.4 min
Half-life of N-13
9.96 min
Half-life of O-15
123 s
Half-life of F-18
110 min
Half-life of Ga-68
68 min
Half-life of Rb-82
76 s
Half-life of Ge-68
271 days
Daily PET QC scan with no patient in the field
Blank scan
Source used for the PET blank scan
Ge-68 rod or cylinder (sealed)
Duration of the daily PET blank scan
5–10 minutes
Blank scan sinogram shows a thin dark diagonal line
Single faulty crystal
Blank scan sinogram shows a broad diagonal band
Failed detector block or PMT
PET scan that corrects per-LOR sensitivity variation
Normalization scan
Frequency and duration of PET normalization
Quarterly, ≥6 hours
Appearance of poorly normalized PET data
Ring or streak artifacts
Typical PET energy window for LSO
~425–650 keV
PET calibration that converts counts to Bq/mL for SUV
Well-counter (absolute activity) cross-calibration
PET cross-calibration must use
The same dose calibrator used for patient doses
Relationship of scanner calibration error to SUV error
About 1:1
Annual PET performance testing standard
NEMA NU-2
Frequency of PET coincidence timing check
Weekly
PET artifact causing a cold band at the lung base/diaphragm
Respiratory misregistration
PET artifact with a bright rim where the patient exceeds the CT FOV
Truncation artifact
PET artifact from metal or dense contrast
False hot spots (overcorrection)
Images to review when a PET/CT artifact is suspected
Non-attenuation-corrected (NAC) images
PET acquisition mode recording every event with a timestamp
List mode
Gating that extracts the signal from list-mode data without hardware
Data-driven gating
8-gate vs 16-gate cardiac PET LVEF compared to echo
8 underestimates; 16 matches
Respiratory gating more robust to irregular breathing
Amplitude-based gating
4D PET means
Respiratory-gated PET
Bed motion giving uniform axial sensitivity
Continuous bed motion (CBM)
SUV formula
Tissue conc ÷ (injected dose ÷ body weight)
Body weight unit used in SUV
Grams
SUV of a tracer distributed uniformly with no excretion
1
Normal liver SUV (internal control)
~1.7–2.7
Effect of FDG dose infiltration on SUV
Falsely low SUV
SUV error from using kg instead of g
1,000× error
SUV example: 70 kg, 10 mCi at scan time, lesion 0.0007 mCi/mL
SUV ≈ 4.9
FDG uptake time before imaging
~60 min
FDG mechanism of localization
Glucose analog, trapped as FDG-6-phosphate
Adult FDG dose
10–20 mCi (370–740 MBq)
Pediatric FDG dose
0.10–0.14 mCi/kg, min 0.7 mCi
FDG patient fasting requirement
4–6 hours, water only
Common US blood glucose limit for FDG PET
200 mg/dL reschedule
Effect of insulin given too close to FDG injection
Diffuse skeletal muscle uptake
CT parameter controlling beam quality, penetration and contrast
kVp
CT parameter controlling beam quantity, noise and dose only
mA (mAs)
CT noise relationship to mAs
Noise ∝ 1 ÷ √mAs
mAs relationship to dose
Linear
CT pitch formula
Table feed per rotation ÷ beam collimation width
Pitch with 12 mm collimation and 18 mm table feed
1.5
Effect of pitch >1
Faster, lower dose, worse z-axis resolution
Effect of thinner CT slices
More noise, less partial volume
Whole-body effective dose of AC-only vs diagnostic CT
~3–6 mSv vs ~11–20 mSv
CT filter that evens the beam across the patient
Bow-tie filter
CT collimators that set slice thickness
Pre-patient collimators
CT noise from too few x-rays
Quantum mottle
HU formula
1,000 × (µtissue − µwater) ÷ µwater
HU of water
0
HU of air
−1,000