1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
PROBLEM 1: Spheres in 3D
Q1: Where does the sphere equation come from? Why does it have that form?
A sphere is the set of all points that are the same distance r from a center (h,k,l).
By the 3D distance formula (the Pythagorean theorem applied twice), the distance from (x,y,z) to the center is:(x−h)2+(y−k)2+(z−l)2
Setting that equal to r and squaring both sides gives:(x−h)2+(y−k)2+(z−l)2=r2
PROBLEM 1: Spheres in 3D
How did you find the radius?
Why can you use r2 directly instead of r?
The sphere passes through (6,−3,3), so that point is exactly r from the center (−3,6,3).
Any point on a sphere is exactly r from the center, so one point plus the center is enough.
I used the distance formula between those two points. Since the equation has r2 on the right side, I could just use r² directly: r2=92+(−9)2+02=162
PROBLEM 1: Spheres in 3D:
Why did you set z=0?
What is this curve called?
The xy-plane is every point where z=0.
A point on the intersection has to be on both the sphere and the plane, so it has to satisfy both equations at once.
Substituting z=0 into the sphere's equation does exactly that.
The resulting curve is called a TRACE.
PROBLEM 1: Spheres in 3D:
Why is the z-term equal to 9 instead of disappearing?
What does that tell you about the center?
The z-term becomes (0−3)2=9 because the center has z-coordinate 3, so it's 3 units above the xy-plane.
That 9 is the squared distance from the center to the plane.
Subtracting it from r2=162 gives the circle's squared radius, 153.
It's the Pythagorean theorem in a cross-section: the hypotenuse is the sphere's radius 162, one leg is the height 3, and the other leg is the circle's radius 153.
That's why the circle is smaller than the sphere. If the center were in the plane, the term would vanish and the circle would have the full radius 162.
PROBLEM 1: Spheres in 3D:
Does every sphere intersect the xy-plane?
How would you know from the equation?
No. After substituting z=0, the right side is r2−l2.
r2−l2>0: a CIRCLE (the plane cuts through).
r2−l2=0: a SINGLE POINT (the plane just touches).
r2−l2<0: NO INTERSECTION, since a sum of squares can't be negative. Example: with the center at z=20 we'd get (x+3)2+(y−6)2=162−400=−238, which is impossible. Here 162−9=153>0, so it's a circle.
PROBLEM 1: Spheres in 3D:
How do you know your answer is correct?
How could you check it?
For (a), plug the given point (6,−3,3) into the equation: (6+3)2+(−3−6)2+(3−3)2=81+81+0=162
That matches r2 (not r), so the point is on the sphere.
For (b), the circle's ρ2=153 should equal r2−l2=162−9, and it does.
I could also take a point on the circle, like (−3+153,6,0), and confirm it satisfies the sphere's equation.
PROBLEM 2: Work and the Dot Product:
Why is work the dot product of F and D?
Only the part of the force in the direction of motion does work.
That part has magnitude ∣F∣cosθ, so the work is ∣F∣cosθ⋅∣D∣.
That's exactly the geometric definition of the dot product, F⋅D=∣F∣∣D∣cosθ.
In components it's F1D1+F2D2+F3D3, so I don't need to find θ.
PROBLEM 2: Work and the Dot Product:
How did you get D?
What would happen to W if you subtracted in the wrong order?
I subtracted the starting point from the end point in each coordinate: D=⟨5,6,6⟩.
Subtracting the other way flips every component's sign, so D would become ⟨−5,−6,−6⟩and it would point along the same line but in the opposite direction, and W would come out as −77 J.
That would wrongly say the force works against the motion.
PROBLEM 2: Work and the Dot Product:
Why not just multiply ∣F∣ by the distance?
Would that give a bigger or smaller answer?
The force and displacement don't point the same way, and only the part of the force along the displacement does work.
Multiplying magnitudes assumes they're parallel, which overstates the work:
∣F∣=75≈8.66 N,
∣D∣=97≈9.85 m, so ∣F∣∣D∣=7275≈85.3 J
which is more than 77 J.
The dot product can never be larger than ∣F∣∣D∣. They're equal only when the force and displacement point the same direction.
PROBLEM 2: Work and the Dot Product:
What is the angle between F and D?
What does the positive answer tell you?
cosθ=∣F∣∣D∣F⋅D=759777=727577≈0.9028, so θ≈25.5∘. Since θ<90∘, cosθ>0, so the work is positive: the force mostly helps the motion. About 90% of the force points along the displacement, which is why 77 J is about 90% of 85.3 J.
θ<90∘: W>0 (helps the motion)
θ=90∘: W=0 (perpendicular, does nothing)
θ>90∘: W<0 (opposes the motion)
PROBLEM 2: Work and the Dot Product:
Why are the units joules?
The force is in newtons and the displacement is in meters.
Each term in the dot product, like F1D1, is newtons times meters, so the work is in newton-meters.
One newton-meter is defined as one joule: 1 J=1 N⋅m.
PROBLEM 2: Work and the Dot Product:
Does it matter that the object moves in a straight line?
What if the force weren't constant?
For a CONSTANT force, only the start and end points matter. Chop any path into small pieces ΔDi
Then:∑F⋅ΔDi=F⋅∑ΔDi=F⋅D, because F is the same on every piece and the pieces add up to the total displacement.
So a curved path would also give 77 J. The "straight line" just makes it clear that D is the displacement.
If the force VARIED along the path, F couldn't be pulled out of the sum. I'd need to know the path and use a line integral, W=∫CF⋅dr (later in Calc 3).
PROBLEM 2: Work and the Dot Product:
What is the projection of one vector onto another?
How does it relate to work?
SCALAR PROJECTION (a number): compab=∣b∣cosθ=∣a∣a⋅b
VECTOR PROJECTION (a vector): projab=(∣a∣2a⋅b)a
GEOMETRICALLY: the shadow of b on the line through a (drop a perpendicular from the tip of b). The leftover b−projab is perpendicular to a. The scalar projection is negative when θ>90∘.
WORK: the component of the force along the motion times the distance. compDF=9777≈7.82 N, so W=9777⋅97=77 J. Of the 8.66 N force, 7.82 N acts along the motion; the perpendicular rest does no work.
Vector version: projDF=9777⟨5,6,6⟩≈⟨3.97,4.76,4.76⟩.
Link to Problem 4: a dot product of 0 means each projection is zero, i.e. perpendicular.
PROBLEM 2: Work and the Dot Product:
Why is a⋅b=∣a∣∣b∣cosθ?
Proof with the LAW OF COSINES:
Put a and b tail to tail with angle θ; the third side is a−b.
Law of Cosines: ∣a−b∣2=∣a∣2+∣b∣2−2∣a∣∣b∣cosθ
Dot product: ∣a−b∣2=(a−b)⋅(a−b)=∣a∣2−2a⋅b+∣b∣2
Set equal: the squared lengths cancel, leaving a⋅b=∣a∣∣b∣cosθ
PROBLEM 3: The Normal Plane:
What is the normal plane, and why is r′(t) its normal vector?
The normal plane at a point is the plane through that point that's perpendicular to the curve's direction of motion.
A plane is determined by a point and a normal vector, meaning a vector perpendicular to the plane.
The curve's direction is given by the tangent vector r′(t). Since the plane is perpendicular to that direction, r′(t) is perpendicular to the plane, which is exactly what a normal vector is.
(The normal plane contains every line through the point that's perpendicular to the tangent.)
PROBLEM 3: The Normal Plane:
Why does "parallel planes" mean you compare normal vectors?
A plane's normal vector determines its ORIENTATION, meaning how it's tilted in space.
Every plane perpendicular to a given direction has the same tilt.
Two planes are parallel when they have the same tilt, so they must be perpendicular to the same direction.
That means their normal vectors point along the same line (the same way or opposite ways), so the normals are parallel.
Picture a stack of paper sheets with a pencil standing straight up through them.
PROBLEM 3: The Normal Plane:
Why set r′(t)=k⟨3,3,−4⟩ instead of r′(t)=⟨3,3,−4⟩?
Parallel planes need parallel normal vectors, not equal ones. Two vectors are parallel when one is a SCALAR MULTIPLE of the other, so I set r′(t)=k⟨3,3,−4⟩.
The length of a normal vector doesn't matter, only its direction. Here k=1, but I couldn't assume that ahead of time.
Example: the same plane written as 6x+6y−8z=4 has normal ⟨6,6,−8⟩.
Setting r′(t) equal to that would give 3=6 (no solution), while using k gives k=21 and the same t=−1.
PROBLEM 3: The Normal Plane:
Why isn't t=1 a solution?
t=1 satisfies the x-component (since 3t2=3 gives t=±1)
but it fails the z-component: 4(1)3=4, not −4.
At t=1, r′(1)=⟨3,3,4⟩, which isn't a scalar multiple of ⟨3,3,−4⟩.
Only t=−1 satisfies all three components at once.
PROBLEM 3: The Normal Plane:
How do you know the two planes are parallel and not the same plane?
Both planes have the same coefficients, ⟨3,3,−4⟩, so they have the same normal vector and the same tilt.
The normal plane is 3(x+1)+3(y+3)−4(z−1)=0, or 3x+3y−4z=−16, so the constants differ (−16 vs 2).
More convincingly, plug the point (−1,−3,1) into the given plane: 3(−1)+3(−3)−4(1)=−16=2.
The point isn't on the given plane, so they're two separate parallel planes.
"Different equations" alone isn't enough, since 6x+6y−8z=4 is the same plane as 3x+3y−4z=2
PROBLEM 4: Angle Between Two Space Curves:
Why is the angle between the curves the angle between their tangent vectors?
Curves don't have a single direction, so the angle between them is DEFINED at the intersection point using their tangent lines.
Close up, each curve looks like its tangent line
The tangent vectors r1′ and r2′ point along those lines, so the angle between the curves is the angle between the tangent vectors, which I find with the dot product formula cosθ=∣r1′∣∣r2′∣r1′⋅r2′.
PROBLEM 4: Angle Between Two Space Curves:
How did you find the t-value for each curve?
Why check each curve separately?
I set each component equal to the matching coordinate of (2,0,0).
I solved the easiest component first and checked that the value works in the other two, since t must satisfy all three at once.
I did this for each curve separately because each has its own parameter, and they could reach the point at different t-values.
PROBLEM 4: Angle Between Two Space Curves:
Why did you use r′(t) and not r(t)?
I need the angle between the TANGENT vectors, and r′(t) is the tangent vector: it points in the direction the curve is moving.
r(t) is the POSITION vector, pointing from the origin to the point.
At the intersection, both curves have the same position, ⟨2,0,0⟩, so using r(t) would give 0∘ for any two curves crossing there.
That says nothing about how the curves are actually moving.
PROBLEM 4: Angle Between Two Space Curves:
What does a dot product of 0 tell you?
Since a⋅b=∣a∣∣b∣cosθ and neither vector is zero, a dot product of 0 forces cosθ=0, so θ=90∘.
The vectors are perpendicular: neither has any component in the other's direction.
a⋅b>0 : acute angle (partly the same way)
a⋅b=0: 90∘ (perpendicular)
a⋅b<0: obtuse angle (partly opposite ways)
PROBLEM 4: Angle Between Two Space Curves:
What if the formula gave an obtuse angle?
Two crossing lines make two angles, θ and 180∘−θ.
Which one the formula gives depends on the direction each curve is traced, since reversing a parameter (t→−t) flips its tangent vector.
By convention, the angle between curves is the acute one, so I'd report 180∘−θ, or use cosθ=∣r1′∣∣r2′∣∣r1′⋅r2′∣. Here the angle is 90∘, so both choices agree.
PROBLEM 5: Tangent Line to a Parametric Curve:
What does dxdy represent, and where does dx/dtdy/dt come from?
dxdy is the slope of the tangent line, the rate of change of y with respect to x
Slope is rise over run, and dtdy and dtdx are the rates of rise and run as t changes
Formally, it comes from the CHAIN RULE: dtdy=dxdy⋅dtdx, so dividing by dtdx gives dxdy=dx/dtdy/dt
PROBLEM 5: Tangent Line to a Parametric Curve:
Why does the formula need dtdx=0?
What if dtdx=0?
The formula divides by dtdx, so it needs dtdx=0
Geometrically, dtdx=0 means there's no horizontal motion at that instant
If dtdy=0, the curve is moving straight up or down, so the tangent is VERTICAL with undefined slope
PROBLEM 5: Tangent Line to a Parametric Curve:
Why did you need the product rule?
Both x and y are PRODUCTS OF TWO FUNCTIONS OF t:
4t⋅cost and
4t⋅sint
Since both factors change with t, I need the product rule
PROBLEM 5: Tangent Line to a Parametric Curve:
How do you know (4π,0) is the right point?
I plugged t=−π into both equations:
x=4(−π)(−1)=4π and
y=4(−π)(0)=0
So the point is (4π,0)
PROBLEM 5: Tangent Line to a Parametric Curve Q5: How can you check that your answer makes sense?
PROBLEM 6: Polar Equation of a Conic Q1: Why did you rewrite the equation first?
The standard forms all have a 1 as the constant in the denominator. That's what makes the coefficient of sinθ equal to e. The original, −2sinθ−17, has −1 as the constant and an extra minus sign out front, so I couldn't read e or the directrix's side directly. Multiplying the top and bottom by −1 gives 1−2sinθ7, which matches 1−esinθed, so I can read off e=2 and ed=7. Example: for r=3−6sinθ7, reading e=6 would be wrong. Divide the top and bottom by 3 to get 1−2sinθ7/3, so e=2.
PROBLEM 6: Polar Equation of a Conic Q2: How did you get e and d, and how do you know where the directrix is?
Matching 1−2sinθ7 to 1−esinθed: the coefficient of sinθ is e, so e=2. The numerator is ed=7, so d=27. Because the form has sinθ, the directrix is HORIZONTAL, a line y= constant. Because the denominator has a MINUS sign, it's BELOW the pole. So the directrix is y=−27. (d is a distance, so it's always positive. The sign in the denominator gives the side.)
PROBLEM 6: Polar Equation of a Conic Q3: Why does e decide the type of conic? What does e=2 mean geometrically?
MEANING OF e=2: e is the fixed ratio ∣Pℓ∣∣PF∣. With e=2, every point on the curve is TWICE AS FAR from the focus as it is from the directrix. WHY e DECIDES THE SHAPE: look at whether the denominator 1−esinθ can be zero (where r blows up to infinity). Since −1≤sinθ≤1:
PROBLEM 6: Polar Equation of a Conic Q4: Why is r negative at θ=2π, and what does that mean for the sketch?
At θ=2π, sinθ=1, so the denominator is 1−2=−1 and r=−7. A negative r means you go in the OPPOSITE direction from θ. The angle 2π points straight up, so r=−7 puts the point 7 units straight DOWN, at (0,−7), not (0,7). More generally, whenever sinθ>21 (that is, 6π<θ<65π), the denominator is negative and r<0. Those angles trace the entire LOWER BRANCH. All other angles give r>0 and trace the upper branch.
PROBLEM 6: Polar Equation of a Conic Q5: Where are the focus, vertices, and asymptotes?
The FOCUS is at the pole, (0,0), because the polar form assumes that. The VERTICES lie on the axis through the focus perpendicular to the directrix, here the y-axis. Plugging in θ=23π and 2π gives (0,−37) and (0,−7). The CENTER is their midpoint, (0,−314). The ASYMPTOTES go through the center in the directions where the denominator is zero, sinθ=21, so θ=6π,65π, with slopes ±31: y=−314±3x. Check: a=37 (center to vertex), c=314 (center to focus), so e=ac=2, which matches.
PROBLEM 6: Polar Equation of a Conic Q6: Where does the polar form r=1−esinθed come from?
Put the focus at the pole and the directrix at y=−d. Take a point P=(rcosθ, rsinθ).
PROBLEM 6: Polar Equation of a Conic Q7: Could you have solved it by converting to Cartesian coordinates?
Yes. It's a good way to VERIFY the answer, though the polar form gives e and the directrix directly, which is why I used it.