Evidence-Based Clinical Practice: Accessing Information and Study Designs

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary practice flashcards covering evidence-based practice steps, PICO question construction, literature search protocols, PRISMA reporting standards, and epidemiology study designs.

16 Terms

1
New cards

Five A's of Evidence-Based Practice

The sequential five-step cycle for clinical practice comprising: Ask a question, Access the information, Appraise the articles found, Apply the information, and Audit.

2
New cards

PICO Framework

A structured format used to build clinical questions: P (Patient, problem, population or person), I (Intervention, diagnostic test or prognostic factor/issue), C (Comparison), and O (Outcome(s)).

3
New cards

Search Planner

A tool adapted from the unit textbook used to structure database queries by mapping PICO elements, alternative words or phrases (synonyms, plurals, variations), boolean operators, and inclusion/exclusion criteria.

4
New cards

PRISMA Flow Diagram

A four-phase reporting flow diagram (Identification, Screening, Eligibility, and Included) detailing the progression of records through a systematic review and documenting specific reasons for paper exclusions.

5
New cards

Experimental Study

A research design where the investigator actively intervenes and controls the exposure given to participants; considered the strongest design, though utilized less frequently due to ethical constraints, costs, and resources.

6
New cards

Observational Study

A study design where researchers measure and observe comparisons of interest as exposures or events occur naturally, without intervening or manipulating exposures.

7
New cards

Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)

An experimental study design where participants from a defined population are randomly allocated into two or more groups (e.g., intervention group vs. control group) to measure and compare clinical outcomes.

8
New cards

n-of-1 Randomised Trial

A subgroup of a randomised controlled trial conducted on a single participant, where multiple treatment time periods are randomised to test interventions over time, particularly for chronic or stable conditions.

9
New cards

Cohort Study

An observational, longitudinal study following a group of participants with specific characteristics over time (exposure to outcome) to investigate risks, aetiology, prognosis, or diagnosis.

10
New cards

Case-Control Study

An observational study where participants who have already experienced an outcome (e.g., developing a disease) are matched with similar participants without the outcome to retrospectively analyse differences in risk factors.

11
New cards

Cross-Sectional Study

An observational study that samples a population at a single point in time to assess frequency, evaluate associations between risk factors and outcomes, or compare a candidate diagnostic test against a gold standard.

12
New cards

Case Series

A descriptive study detailing a group of patients exposed to a specific factor or intervention; typically hypothesis-generating rather than providing definitive evidence.

13
New cards

Qualitative Study

An observational study method using interviews, focus groups, or participant observation to investigate the feelings, attitudes, and reasons behind human behaviors.

14
New cards

Internal Validity

The extent to which an experiment demonstrates the true, undistorted effect of an intervention under ideal, controlled conditions, achieved via random assignment which removes baseline confounding in RCTs.

15
New cards

External Validity

The degree to which study findings reflect and generalize to broader, real-world clinical populations and settings; often considered a key strength of observational designs.

16
New cards

Post-Randomisation Bias

Bias introduced into a randomised controlled trial after allocation has taken place, commonly caused by participant non-compliance or loss to follow-up (drop-outs).