EXS 313 Chapter 3 Attention and Motor Performance Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/199

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering foundations of attention, processing stages, attentional focus, and arousal performance under pressure from EXS 313 Chapter 3.

Last updated 5:42 PM on 9/17/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

200 Terms

1
New cards

Attention (Motor Control Context)

The capacity to process information, direct awareness, and allocate cognitive resources toward internal or external environmental cues during motor performance.

2
New cards

Limited Capacity (Property of Attention)

The key characteristic of attention stating that human processing resources are finite, restricting the amount of information that can be attended to at one time.

3
New cards

Selective Attention (Property of Attention)

The property of attention that allows an individual to intentionally focus on specific relevant environmental stimuli while ignoring irrelevant background distractors.

4
New cards

Dynamic / Shiftable Attention

The property of attention that allows an individual to consciously or involuntarily switch attentional focus between different tasks, cues, or spatial locations.

5
New cards

Multi-tasking

The attempt to perform two or more processing tasks simultaneously, which can lead to performance degradation if total attentional demand exceeds capacity.

6
New cards

Interference (Attentional Context)

The performance decrement or disruption that occurs when attempting to perform multiple tasks at the same time due to competition for cognitive resources or physical structures.

7
New cards

Capacity Interference

Interference that occurs when the combined attentional demand of two tasks exceeds the total available cognitive processing resources of the central nervous system.

8
New cards

Capacity Interference Example

Attempting to solve a complex math problem mentally while making a difficult tactical decision in soccer, causing slow or impaired processing in both tasks.

9
New cards

Structural Interference

Interference that occurs when two tasks physically compete for the same sensory receptor, effector organ, or physical structure at the exact same time.

10
New cards

Structural Interference Example

Trying to look at a GPS map on a phone screen while simultaneously maintaining visual focus on the road ahead, as both require the eyes' visual receptor.

11
New cards

Attentional Demand and Motor Practice Rule

As an individual practices and develops a motor skill, the total attentional demand required to execute that skill continuously decreases.

12
New cards

Dual-Task Probe Protocol

The experimental paradigm used by motor control researchers to evaluate changes in attentional demand associated with motor skill practice and learning.

13
New cards

Primary Task (Probe Paradigm)

The main motor skill being practiced and evaluated for attentional demand during a dual-task probe research experiment.

14
New cards

Secondary Task / Probe Stimulus

An unpredictable stimulus (such as an auditory tone) presented during primary task execution requiring a rapid discrete response (such as pressing a button).

15
New cards

Probe Baseline Reaction Time

The reaction time measured when responding to a probe stimulus alone while sitting at rest without executing the primary motor task.

16
New cards

Probe Reaction Time During Task

The reaction time measured when responding to a probe stimulus presented while simultaneously performing the primary motor skill.

17
New cards

Pre-Practice Probe RT Difference

A large difference between probe baseline reaction time and probe reaction time during task performance, indicating high attentional demand of the novice skill.

18
New cards

Post-Practice Probe RT Difference

A smaller difference between probe baseline reaction time and probe reaction time during task performance, demonstrating reduced attentional demand after practice.

19
New cards

Parallel Processing

A type of information processing where two or more streams of information are processed simultaneously without mutual interference or competition.

20
New cards

Serial Processing

A type of information processing where tasks or stimuli are processed sequentially, one after another, creating delays if a second task arrives before the first completes.

21
New cards

Central Resource Capacity Theory

A theory proposing that human attention exists as a single flexible pool of limited resources distributed across all active processing tasks.

22
New cards

Multiple Resource Theory

A theory proposing that human attention consists of several distinct pools of specialized resources (e.g., visual, auditory, motor) rather than a single pool.

23
New cards

Task Complexity and Attentional Demand

The direct relationship where higher task complexity or dynamic environmental conditions increase the total attentional demand required for execution.

24
New cards

Automaticity

The ability to execute a motor skill rapidly with minimal or no conscious attentional control after extensive practice.

25
New cards

Dual-Task Interference Magnitude

The quantitative degree of performance decrement observed when two tasks are attempted concurrently compared to performing each task individually.

26
New cards

Attentional Allocation Policy

The mental mechanism that determines how available attentional capacity is distributed among concurrent tasks based on priorities, novelties, and intentions.

27
New cards

Attentional Effort

The psychological and physiological energy expended by the nervous system to perform mental work or sustain focus on a task.

28
New cards

Primary Task Priority Principle

The experimental requirement in probe studies instructing participants to maintain maximum effort on the primary task regardless of probe occurrences.

29
New cards

Physical Receptor Competition

The physiological mechanism underlying structural interference where two tasks require simultaneous usage of identical physical pathways or organs.

30
New cards

Cognitive Resource Competition

The central nervous system mechanism underlying capacity interference where two mental operations require central processing capacity exceeding total supply.

31
New cards

Attentional Demand Progression

The shift during skill acquisition from high attentional demand requiring conscious processing to low attentional demand operating automatically.

32
New cards

Probe RT Difference Trend

The systematic decrease in the duration gap between baseline probe RT and dual-task probe RT as a motor skill becomes autonomous.

33
New cards

Probe RT Method Purpose

To objectively quantify the specific amount of central attentional capacity occupied by a motor skill at any given stage of learning.

34
New cards

EXS 313 Chapter 3 Focus

The scientific study of attentional capacity, processing stages, focus of attention, and arousal dynamics in human motor performance under Dr. Woodard.

35
New cards

Information Processing Framework

The theoretical model depicting human motor control as a series of mental operations comprising Stimulus Identification, Response Selection, and Response Programming.

36
New cards

Stimulus Identification Stage

The initial stage of information processing responsible for detecting, recognizing, and interpreting sensory environmental input.

37
New cards

Processing Type in Stimulus Identification

Primary reliance on parallel processing, allowing multiple visual, auditory, and tactile environmental stimuli to be processed simultaneously.

38
New cards

Cocktail Party Phenomenon

The phenomenon where an individual can tune into a single conversation in a noisy room, yet involuntarily register their name called across the room.

39
New cards

Cocktail Party Effect and Parallel Processing

Demonstration that unattended sensory information is processed in parallel at a subconscious level during the stimulus identification stage.

40
New cards

Attentional Capture

The involuntary shift of visual or auditory attention triggered by a highly salient, unexpected, or personally meaningful environmental stimulus.

41
New cards

Goalie Name Distraction Scenario

A coach calling a goalie's name during shot preparation triggers attentional capture, interrupting parallel stimulus processing and crucial visual focus.

42
New cards

Inattention Blindness (Inattentional Blindness)

The psychological failure to notice a fully visible but unexpected object or stimulus because visual attention is focused on another task.

43
New cards

Dangerous Contexts for Inattention Blindness

Real-world situations such as operating heavy machinery, piloting an aircraft, or driving a motor vehicle where unobserved hazards lead to accidents.

44
New cards

"Looked-But-Failed-To-See" Accidents

Traffic collisions resulting from inattentional blindness where a driver looks toward a motorcycle, pedestrian, or car but fails to consciously process its presence.

45
New cards

Sustained Attention

The cognitive capability to maintain continuous conscious focus and vigilance on a specific task or environment over an extended period.

46
New cards

Vigilance

Synonym for sustained attention, representing the state of readiness to detect and respond to rare, unpredictable environmental changes.

47
New cards

Mackworth (1948) Research Study

A classic study investigating operator vigilance using the Mackworth Clock Test to measure continuous target detection over prolonged durations.

48
New cards

Mackworth (1948) Protocol

Participants monitored a clock face pointer that stepped forward every second, requiring them to detect rare signal occurrences of a double step.

49
New cards

Mackworth (1948) Signal Jumps

The unpredictable target event consisting of 2 s2\,s pointer jumps (double steps) among regular 1 s1\,s pointer movements.

50
New cards

Mackworth (1948) Performance Decline Timing

Operators demonstrated a noticeable drop in signal detection ability after approximately 30 minutes30\,minutes of continuous monitoring.

51
New cards

Vigilance Decrement

The progressive decline in target detection accuracy and response speed observed during sustained attention tasks over prolonged time periods.

52
New cards

Signal Frequency (Vigilance Factor)

A key factor affecting sustained attention where lower signal frequency leads to a faster decrement in operator vigilance.

53
New cards

Signal Intensity (Vigilance Factor)

A factor affecting sustained attention where weaker, less noticeable sensory signals reduce detection rate and accelerate operator fatigue.

54
New cards

Signal Duration (Vigilance Factor)

A factor in vigilance where brief stimulus presentations are significantly harder to detect over extended periods than long-duration signals.

55
New cards

Environmental Noise (Vigilance Factor)

External auditory or visual ambient distractions that increase cognitive load and accelerate the decline in sustained attention.

56
New cards

Rest Breaks (Vigilance Intervention)

Periodic brief pauses structured into continuous monitoring tasks that effectively restore attentional capacity and eliminate the vigilance decrement.

57
New cards

Stimulus Detection

The basic sensory awareness of the presence of environmental energy in the stimulus identification stage.

58
New cards

Pattern Recognition

The extraction of meaningful spatial or temporal structure from complex environmental inputs during stimulus identification.

59
New cards

Unattended Information Processing

Subconscious sensory analysis that continuously filters environmental inputs before conscious attentional selection occurs.

60
New cards

Perceptual Load

The amount of information processing required by the environmental scene, influencing whether early or late selection occurs.

61
New cards

Visual Search

The active, intentional visual scanning of the environment to locate specific critical performance cues.

62
New cards

Early Selection Model of Attention

A theoretical model proposing that unattended sensory information is filtered out prior to semantic processing during stimulus identification.

63
New cards

Late Selection Model of Attention

A theoretical model proposing that all sensory information is processed semantically before attentional selection limits response access.

64
New cards

Attentional Filter

The metaphorical mechanism that screens out irrelevant ambient input to prevent cognitive overload during stimulus identification.

65
New cards

Saliency

The physical property of a stimulus (such as brightness, contrast, or loudness) that draws automatic visual or auditory attention.

66
New cards

Driven Attention (Exogenous)

Automatic, bottom-up attentional allocation triggered directly by external environmental events.

67
New cards

Goal-Directed Attention (Endogenous)

Voluntary, top-down attentional allocation directed by personal intentions, tactical goals, or conscious focus.

68
New cards

Visual Fixation

Pausing visual gaze on a specific physical object or location to collect precise visual information.

69
New cards

Broadbent's Filter Model

The classic information processing model proposing a rigid single-channel filter early in the stimulus identification process.

70
New cards

Treisman's Attenuation Model

The model proposing that unattended stimuli are weakened rather than completely blocked, explaining the cocktail party effect.

71
New cards

Response Selection Stage

The second stage of information processing responsible for deciding what movement response to make given the identified environment.

72
New cards

Controlled Processing

A slow, serial, voluntary, and resource-demanding mode of processing that requires conscious cognitive control and active decision-making.

73
New cards

Controlled Processing Characteristics

Slow, highly demanding of attentional capacity, serial in nature, and subject to severe interference when performing multiple tasks.

74
New cards

Controlled Processing Task Example

A novice driver manually selecting gears in a stick-shift car or a novice basketball player actively deciding which pass to make.

75
New cards

Automatic Processing

A fast, parallel, involuntary mode of processing that operates without conscious awareness and places minimal demand on attentional capacity.

76
New cards

Automatic Processing Characteristics

Fast, minimal attentional demand, parallel in execution, highly resistant to interference, and developed through extensive practice.

77
New cards

Automatic Processing Task Example

An expert athlete executing a well-rehearsed skill like an experienced driver stepping on the brake at a red light.

78
New cards

Concurrent Controlled Processing Tasks

Attempting two controlled processing tasks simultaneously results in severe performance breakdown and mutual interference due to resource limits.

79
New cards

Automatic Processing and Multi-tasking

Allows execution of a secondary task concurrently because the automated task requires virtually no central attentional capacity.

80
New cards

Automatic Processing in Driving Limitation

Driving cannot rely exclusively on automatic processing because unpredictable traffic emergencies require immediate controlled response selection.

81
New cards

Closed Environment

A stable, predictable movement context where automatic processing is highly effective due to static environmental conditions.

82
New cards

Open Environment

A dynamic, unpredictable movement context requiring continuous controlled processing and rapid decision-making adaptations.

83
New cards

Ishigami & Klein (2009) Study Focus

An empirical investigation evaluating the impact of cell phone use (hands-free vs handheld) on human visual target reaction time.

84
New cards

Ishigami & Klein (2009) Key Finding

Both hands-free and handheld cell phone conversations cause significant and equivalent reaction time delays in driver response selection.

85
New cards

Stroop Test

A psychological experiment where participants name the ink color of printed color words, testing interference between automatic reading and color identification.

86
New cards

Stroop (1935) Reaction Time Slowdown

Participants experienced a 40%40\% slower reaction time when the printed word and ink color were incongruent compared to congruent conditions.

87
New cards

Stroop (1935)

The researcher who published the classic 1935 study demonstrating cognitive interference during incongruent word-color ink naming tasks.

88
New cards

Stroop Effect Information Processing Explanation

Involuntary automatic word reading creates competitive response selection interference against the controlled task of ink color identification.

89
New cards

Congruent Stroop Condition

Trial where the written word matches the ink color (e.g., word RED printed in red ink), yielding rapid, effortless response selection.

90
New cards

Incongruent Stroop Condition

Trial where the written word conflicts with ink color (e.g., word BLUE printed in red ink), causing significant response selection delay.

91
New cards

Automaticity Cost

The difficulty of inhibiting an automated response when environmental context suddenly demands an alternative controlled action.

92
New cards

Hick's Law

The principle stating that reaction time increases logarithmically as the number of stimulus-response choices in response selection increases.

93
New cards

Stimulus-Response Compatibility

The degree of natural or learned alignment between a stimulus and its corresponding required response, influencing response selection speed.

94
New cards

Cognitive Load

The total volume of mental demand placed on working memory during response selection decision-making processes.

95
New cards

Decision Latency

The exact time elapsed within the response selection stage to choose an appropriate movement response.

96
New cards

Response Selection Interference

The delay occurring when competing candidate responses conflict within working memory before one is chosen.

97
New cards

Practice-Induced Processing Shift

The transition of response selection operations from deliberate controlled processing to effortless automatic processing over repeated trials.

98
New cards

Volitional Response Selection

Intentional, conscious evaluation of tactical alternatives to choose an optimal movement action.

99
New cards

Non-conscious Choice Response

An immediate, automated response selection triggered directly by familiar environmental spatial cues without conscious deliberation.

100
New cards

Task Mapping

The established cognitive association between identified environmental stimuli and specific movement outcomes.