1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Arrow-Debreu Security
Pays 1 unit of consumption in one single state of nature, and nothing in any other state.
Completeness
Financial market for a contingent claim that pays off one unit of consumption in that data-state and zero otherwise
provides an alternative deviation of the SDF
Complex Securty
Pays off in more than one state of nature
CAPM motivation
Puts variance on one axis and mean on the other
Useful for deriving portfolio-management and asset-pricing results, but the theory proved difficult to generalise as it requires either quadratic utility or normally distributed returns
Arrow-Debreu Approach
Puts consumption in the good state on one axis and consumption in the bad state on the other axis
Does not require the restrictive underlying assumptions of CAPM
Took much longer to be recognised for its implications on pricing
Advantages of AD
Investors do not have quadratic utility - or even expected utility functions
Returns don’t have to be normally distributed
Theory draws very explicit links between asset prices and the rest of the economy
Disadvantage of AD
While conceptually useful it is too abstract and not easy to use
Difficult to identify individual states of nature, and when you can, their realisation cannot always be verified. Why we dont see pure AD secruties being traded
First and Second Welfare theorems hold in the AD economy
Competitive equilibrium allocations are Pareto-optimal and any pareto-optimal allocation can be decentralised as a competitive equilibrium - this gives a practical shortcut
Risk Sharing
Without aggregate risk, competitive markets fully diversify away all idiosyncratic risk regardless of agent’s risk-aversion.