1/38
Looks like no tags are added yet.
primates as k selected species
stable environment, predictable food supply
high parental investment
few offspring
longer time btw births
longer maturation/ lifespan
bigger body size
alloparenting
non parent helps take care offspring
trained experience w/ mothering —> more prepared when they have their own offspring
provides for adoptive parenting if mother dies
reinforces social bonds among adults
primate autonomic communication
piloerection = hair stands on ends
blushing, sweating
displays (ritualized/ intentional behavior)
gorilla pounding chest, baboon displaying canines
aggressive/ submissive behaviors
gestures
broca’s area
speech production
broca’s aphasia = inability to speak/ articulate words
wernicke’s area
speech language comprehension (coding/ decoding speech)
wernicke’s aphasia = can produce speech but its nonsense
sociobiology
theoretical perspective to explain the behavior of animals
altruism
inclusive fitness
infanticide
altruism
selfless behavior
decreases individual’s fitness for the benefit of others
inclusive fitness
kin selection
50% DNA w/ parent, sibling, offspring
25% DNA w/ niece/ nephew
12.5% DNA w/ cousin
infanticide
male who takes over group will kill all the infants
females then ovulate + male can pass on its DNA to next generation
ex: langurs
human classification
kingdom: animalia
phylum: chordata
class: mammalia
order: primates
family: hominids
genus: Homo
species: sapiens
chordata
nerve cord
gill slits at some point in development
stiff, supporting cord spine
vertebrates (spinal cord)
6 classes of animals
bony fishes
cartilaginous fishes
amphibians
reptiles
birds
mammals
homology/ homologous traits
characteristics shared btw 2 organisms based on descent from a common ancestor
ex: 5 rays in mammals
primitive traits
a trait shared by a common ancestor
derived traits
a trait that is newly evolved in a species
ex: horses going from 5 digits to 1 digit
analogy/ analogous traits
characteristics shared by 2 organisms based on FUNCTION, not by common ancestry
ex: wing of bat vs wing of bird
what kind of traits to use when classifying orgaisms
homologous traits and SHARED derived traits
how to see evolutionary success
# of habitats invaded
# of species
how long the species has survived on earth
# of individuals
arthropods are most successful
precambrian era
3,000 million years ago
evolution of life
first microfossils
paleozoic age
570 million years ago —> cambrian explosion
invertebrates (jellyfish, worms, trilobites) in water
vertebrates evolve
rise of amphibians (fish that left water) towards end of age
mesozoic age
225 million years ago —> age of reptiles
water tight skin and amniote eggs (water tight egg)
strong limbs to support being on land
amazing adaptive radiation bc land was uninhabited —> took advantage of it
DINOSAURS!!
theropods
therapsids
65 mya = mass extinction of dinosaurs bc of meteor —> nuclear winter killing 75%, no bigger than 25 kg organisms survived
therapsids
mesozoic age: mammal like reptiles
heterodonts
led to mammals
therapods
mesozoic age: dinosaurs that led to birds
cenozoic age
66 million yrs ago to present day —> age of mammals
monotremes: egg laying mammals; most primitive, incomplete homeothermic, lactation through pores
marsupials: pouch mammals; births, immature creatures, and goes into pouches for more development
Placental mammals: internalized egg, placenta
Paleocene, Eocene, Oligocene
placental mammals
Very successful all around earth
Came from therapsids
Rodents = most successful, 2/5 of all mammals
Bats = second most successful, 925 species
homplasy
separate evolutionary development of similar traits that is NOT from common ancestors
Includes analogies = homoplasies that are functional
Parallel evolution
Convergent evolution
Parallel evolution
not so differently related
ex: OWM (gibbons: long armed fruit specialists) vs. NWM (spider monkey: long armed fruit specialist)
Convergent evolution
separate evolutionary development of similar structures in very unrelated species, distinctly related
ex: marsupials vs placentals
How does a species form?
IMPORTANT: Geographic isolation
phyletic gradualism
Punctuated equilibrium
Phyletic gradualism
accumulation of differences in populations that overtime lead to a new species
Punctuated equilibrium
periods of stasis punctuated by speciation events
Paleocene
65-55 million years ago
angiosperm radiation
Plesiadapiformes dominate
plesiadapiformes
primate like
europe, china, north america
posterior dentition = primate like, anterior dentition = very derived
lacks post orbital bars
laterally placed eyes
claws instead nails
part of eurachonta
eurachonta
plesiadaiformes
primates
scandentia
dermoptera
species most closely related to order primates
scandentia = tree shrews
dermoptera = flying lemurs/ colugos
chiroptera = bats
eocene
55-34 million years ago —> promisian radiation
western US, europe, africa, asia
eurprimates = true primates!
post orbital bar
Nails instead of claws
Grasping hands and feet
General dentition
Adapids = lemur like, led to strepsirrhines
omomyids = tarsier like, led to haplorrhines
oligocene
37-29 million years ago
fayum in egypt —> preservation of fossils, seeds, bark, pollen
first time we see primates in south america (rafted on land mass)
fayum primates:
oligopithecids
parapithecids
propliopithecids
NWM and OWM split from apidiums
parapithecids
more primitive —> Apidium, 2-1-3-3 dental formula
ancestor of NWM and OWM
propliopithecids
more derived —> aegyptopithecus, 2-1-2-3 dental formula, Y-5 molars
ancestor of OWM, spider monkey like