Exam 2 Ecology and Evolution Terms

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/38

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:29 PM on 10/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

39 Terms

1
New cards

Explotative Competition

INDIRECT competition through depletion of resources

(ex. two bugs species feeding not the same plant)

2
New cards

Interference Competition

DIRECT competition that reduces another organism’s ability to acquire resources

(ex. two males fighting over a mate)

3
New cards

Pre-emptive Competition

competition for space when early occupants prevent later establishment

(ex. birds claiming a tree cavity, so no other birds can)

4
New cards

Intraspecific Competition

competition among members of the same species for a shared resource

(ex. deer fighting over a mate)

5
New cards

Interspecific competition

competition between different species for a common resource

(ex. birds fighting over seeds in a feeder)

6
New cards

Allelopathy

a plant releases a chemical interference that suppresses a competitors growth

(ex. buckthorn releases a chemical compound called emotion into the soil through roots and leaves)

7
New cards

Describe Joseph Connel’s experiment with barnacles. What did this experiment reveal about fundamental and realized niches?

Two Barnacle species, Cthamalus (top section) and Balanus(bottom section). Joseph Connel removes the bottom layer and observed that Cthamalus took over the bottom section of the rock. The whole rock was Cthamalus fundamental niche, because without having to compete with Balanus it took over the whole rock. The two species living on the same rock was the realized niche because it is actually how they live.

8
New cards

Fundamental Niche

where species could live if there was no competition or limiting factors

9
New cards

Realized Niche

where species actually live because of competition and limiting factors

10
New cards

Competitive Exclusion

knowt flashcard image
11
New cards

Competitive Coexistence

knowt flashcard image
12
New cards

What are the four strategies that can lead to competitive coexistence?

  1. Spatial niche partitioning

  2. Temporal niche partitioning

  3. Behavioral niche partitioning

  4. Character Displacement


13
New cards

Spatial Niche Partitioning

when different species use different areas or locations to access resources, reducing competition with each other

ex: two bird species live in the same tree, but one searches for food near the top branches while the other searches near the bottom branches

14
New cards

Temporal Niche Partitioning

when different species use the same resources at different times to reduce competition

ex. mammals foraging at different times of day

15
New cards

Behavioral Niche Partitioning

when different species behave differently to access resources, reducing competition with each other

ex. two bird species eat insects from the same tree, but one searches for insects on the leaves while the other searches under the bark

16
New cards

Character Displacement

species living in the same area develop traits to reduce competition

ex. Darwin’x finches evolving diffrent beak types to eat different foods in the same area

17
New cards

r

intrinsic growth rate

18
New cards

K

carrying capacity when N is 0

19
New cards

N

intraspecific crowding (N = 5 rabbits, not very crowded), (N = 100 rabbits, fairly crowded)

20
New cards

aN2

the total competitive effect that species 2 has on the population growth of species 1

Imagine:

  • species 1 = rabbits

  • species 2 = deer

  • one deer needs four times the food that 1 rabbit needs

  • a = 4

in the context of the equation, aN2 is how much crowding species 2 causes species 1m


21
New cards

a < 1

One N2 counts as less than one N1. Species 2 has a weaker effect on species 1 than species 1 has on itself

22
New cards

a = 1

One N2 counts as exactly one N1. The two individuals create equal crowding effects on species 1.

23
New cards

a > 1

One N2 counts as more than one N1. Species 2 has a stronger effect on species 1 than self-crowding.

24
New cards

What were some key-takeaways from the Snowshoe Hare study, Krebs et al. 1955?

  • The Snowshoe Hare cycle is a three level trophic interaction between food supplies and predators, not either one alone

  • Top-down (predators) and borrow-up(atrophic/plants) forces act together, rather than either one of them acting in a vacuum


25
New cards

“alpha”

the effect of N2 on population growth rate of N1, measured in units of N1

26
New cards

“beta” (predator-prey model)

Conversion efficiency — measures the ability of the predator population to convert captured victims into new predator offspring

27
New cards

Hutchinson’s niche

an n-dimensional hyper volume that defines a set of conditions of which dN/dt is greater than zero

28
New cards

K-selection

the type of selection that acts upon individuals born into a crowded environment

29
New cards

neutral equilibrium

the system rests at a state (or within a cycle), until some outside force pushes the system to a new point

30
New cards

isocline

the line in a state space graph that represents combinations of abundances of N1 and N2, such that dN/dt = 0

31
New cards

bet-hedging

a reproductive strategy that reduces the risk of total reproductive failure when environmental conditions are unpredictable. Instead of putting all their reproductive effort into one outcome, organisms spread their risk

ex: a plant produces seeds that remain dominant for different lengths of time, so not all seeds try to grow in the same year

32
New cards

paradox of the plankton

the observation that many plankton species coexist in the same environment even though they appear to compete for a limited number of resources

33
New cards

rescue effect

when individuals immigrate into small or declining population and help prevent it from going extinct

ex: birds from a nearby population move into a small population where the number of birds is falling

34
New cards

sink population

a population in a habitat where local reproduction and survival are not enough to replace deaths. The population persists because individuals immigrate from other populations

ex: a sink depends on immigration to survive

35
New cards

Type III survivorship curve

a survivorship pattern in which many individuals die when they are young, but those that survive early in life may live much longer

ex: many fish, insects and plants produce large numbers of offspring, but only a small fraction survive to adulthood

36
New cards

sympatry

when two species or populations live in the same geographic area and have the opportunity to encounter one another

ex: two closely related bird species living in the same forest

37
New cards

5 assumptions of Lotka-Volterra Predator-Prey Model

  1. No migration, age or size structure, genetic structure, time lags

  2. No carrying capacity for V

  3. P is a specialist on V

  4. P and V encounter each other randomly in a homogeneous environment

  5. Individual predators are insatiable


38
New cards

Predator-Prey Model Equations

Prey: rV - aVP

Predator: BVP - qP

39
New cards

Competition

an interaction between two species that negatively affect each other