Used the Socratic Method (questioning to expose contradictions).
Skeptical of majority rule (the multitude cannot be trusted).
Valued reason over popular opinion.
Argued that only those trained in wisdom should govern.
Executed for “corrupting the youth” and “impiety.”
Rejected democracy in favor of a Philosopher-King.
Developed a tripartite theory of the soul:
Reason (Gold) → Guardians (Rulers).
Spirit (Silver) → Auxiliaries (Warriors).
Appetite (Bronze/Iron) → Artisans/Producers.
Believed justice meant each group performing its designated role.
Saw democracy as dangerous—the uneducated masses could be misled.
Advocated moderation as the key to virtue.
Argued for a mixed government:
Monarchy (One), Aristocracy (Few), Democracy (Many).
Saw middle-class governance as ideal—avoids extremes.
Defined Polity as the best form of government (a balanced system).
Believed the masses must be included in governance but checked.
Classified societies based on rank, reason, and function.
Explored democracy vs. tyranny in his plays.
Argued that tyranny suppresses freedom and justice.
Saw democracy as a system that ensures participation (though flawed).
Defended rule of law against tyranny.
Believed democracy is preferable because it ensures:
Political participation.
Protection of private property.
Freedom from oppression.
Roman historian who advocated for a mixed government.
Proposed a system combining monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy.
Influenced modern ideas of checks and balances.
Wrote The Prince (1513) on power and statecraft.
Emphasized realpolitik—leaders should prioritize power over morality.
Argued that laws are essential for stable governance.
Stated that both princes and the masses have flaws:
Princes become arrogant and corrupt.
Masses are fickle but can be controlled.
Preferred trusting the multitude over a single ruler.
Saw law as a check on both rulers and citizens.
Wrote Democracy in America (1835).
Coined the term “Equality of Conditions”—saw America as more equal than Europe.
Noted democracy’s tendency toward mediocrity:
Encourages equality but may hinder excellence.
Admired checks and balances in the U.S. system.
Questioned whether democracy considered Indigenous peoples and slavery.
Wrote Leviathan (1651).
Described the State of Nature as:
Violent, chaotic, and insecure ("war of all against all").
Proposed the Social Contract:
People surrender their freedoms to a sovereign power for order.
Advocated for a strong, absolute ruler (Leviathan) to maintain peace.
Viewed humans as rational but self-interested.
Separated religion from state affairs.
Wrote Second Treatise of Government (1689).
Saw the State of Nature as:
More peaceful than Hobbes described but inconvenient due to lack of laws.
Advocated for Natural Rights:
Life, Liberty, and Property.
Proposed government by consent—leaders must protect rights.
Believed in the right to revolution if the government fails its duty.
Supported religious toleration.
Defined private property as land mixed with labor.
Introduced Spoilage and Sufficiency Principles:
Spoilage – People should not hoard more than they need.
Sufficiency – There should be enough left for others.
Wrote The German Ideology (1846).
Critiqued ideology as a tool of oppression.
Introduced Base and Superstructure:
Base – Economic structure (who owns what).
Superstructure – Politics, culture, and ideas shaped by the base.
Believed ideology serves the ruling class.
Saw capitalism as exploitative, justifying economic inequality.
Advocated for class consciousness and revolutionary change.
Coined the term “Ideology” in the late 18th century.
Viewed ideology as a science of ideas.
Believed only elites could develop the best political principles.
Argued that reason and progress should guide society.
Rejected religion in governance, promoting secular political thought.