MW

Notes on Ethics in Public Speaking

Learning Objectives

  • Explain the legal, cultural, philosophical, and social origins of ethics in public speaking.
  • Differentiate between plagiarism and correct appropriation of source materials.
  • Understand the importance of ethics for a speaker's reputation.
  • Accurately incorporate source material into presentations.

3.1 – Sources of Ethical Stances on Communication and Public Speaking

  • Benefits of Public Speaking:

  • Increases self-confidence.

  • Enhances critical thinking through argument formulation.

  • Fosters interpersonal connections and idea exchange.

  • Prepares for future presentations in academic, civic, and professional life.

  • Rhetoric’s Historical Role:

  • Central in Western culture for community building, self-governance, sharing ideas, and policy creation.

  • Ancient Athenian Greeks viewed rhetoric education as essential for citizen engagement.

  • Aristotle on Rhetoric:

  • Advocated that individuals should defend ideas rhetorically just as they would defend themselves physically.

  • Ethics in Public Speaking:

  • Essential for informed audience decision-making and credibility.

  • Defined as the philosophical branch determining right and moral actions.

  • Influenced by personal values and external factors.

  • Articulating Ethical Standards:

  • Understand and express personal ethical communication standards.

  • Importance of ethical speaking in maintaining individual reputation and audience trust.

3.2 – Credibility and Ethics

  • Definition of Credibility:

  • Audience's perception of a speaker's trustworthiness.

  • Factors contributing to credibility include:

    • Similarity: Shared experiences or beliefs with the audience.
    • Character: Speaker’s honesty and integrity.
    • Competence: Knowledge and experience in the subject matter.
    • Goodwill: Perceived ethical intentions toward the audience.
  • Variability in Credibility:

  • Different audiences perceive the same speaker differently (e.g., political figures).

  • Credibility can change throughout a presentation and is categorized as:

    • Initial Credibility: Established before or at the speech's start.
    • Derived Credibility: Established throughout the presentation based on audience judgment.
    • Terminal Credibility: Final perception of the speaker after the presentation.
  • Ethical Credibility:

  • Must be established honestly without deceit or manipulation.

  • Transparency and honesty are fundamental for maintaining credibility across all stages.

3.3 – Plagiarism

  • Defining Plagiarism:

  • Using another's words or ideas without attribution.

  • Can lead to serious academic and professional consequences.

  • **Common Types of Plagiarism: **

  • Stealing: Presenting someone else's work as your own.

  • Sneaking: Rearranging sentences or slightly altering them without proper credit.

  • Borrowing: Citing sources incorrectly, misrepresenting ideas, or poorly paraphrasing.

  • Preventing Plagiarism:

  • Understand and apply proper citation practices.

  • Use a consistent format (e.g., APA, MLA) as required.

  • Know the difference between common knowledge (no citation needed) and original ideas (require citation).

  • Ethical Use of Sources:

  • Clearly cite sources to maintain transparency.

  • Effectively summarize and paraphrase material with accurate management and understanding.

  • Be wary of using direct quotations too frequently; substitute with paraphrasing when possible.

  • Best Practices for Ethical Citations in Speeches:

  • Provide context for citations: mention the author, their credentials, and the date of publication.

  • Ensure audience understanding by framing information in relatable and clear language.

Conclusion

  • Learning to cite source material correctly is essential for ethical communication.
  • Establishing a habit of attributing sources helps build credibility as a speaker.