Theories of Personality: Hans Eysenck & Raymond Cattell
1916-1998
Eysenck focused on normal and pathological populations
He felt that many traits are biologically based and were shaped by evolutionary forces (e.g., extraversion, neuroticism)
He used factor analysis to identify traits
Eysenck is not concerned with concepts of determinism vs free choice, optimism vs pessimism, and causality vs teleology
Biology over social influence
Conscious over unconscious
Uniqueness over similarity
Extraversion - Introversion
Introversion: tendermindedness; introspectiveness; seriousness; performance interfered with by excitement; easily aroused but restrained; inhibited; preference for solitary vocations’ sensitivity to pain
Extraversion: toughmindedness; impulsiveness; tendency to be outgoing; desire for novelty; performance enhanced by excitement; preference for vocations involving contact with other people; tolerance for pain
Research indicates that introverts and extroverts are not different at resting levels, but introverts are more reactive to moderate levels of simulation than extraverts
This work led by Eysenck to revise his theory – the difference between introverts and extroverts lies in arousability, not in baseline arousal
Neuroticism - Stability
Psychoticism - Superego Function
Eysenck views personality as a “hierarchy of traits.” He placed special emphasis on biological differences that occur along the extraversion-introversion dimension
Introverts have higher levels of physiological arousal causing them to avoid overly stimulating social situations
Extraverts have lower baseline levels of arousal and, thus, seek stimulation from social situations
Trait theorists aim to describe personality with a small number of traits or factors
Personality trait - stable quality a person shows across most situations
Surface Traits: features that make up the visible areas of personality
Source Traits: underlying traits of a personality; each reflected in a number of surface traits
Cattell also created 16PF, personality test
Gives a picture of an individual’s personality
Factor Analysis: technique employed by Raymond Cattell to determine the structure of human personality
Factor Analysis: technique employed by Raymond Cattell to determine the structure of human personality
Source Traits: basic traits that make up the human personality
Limitation: procedure is confined by the type of data chosen for analysis
The 5-factor model of personality is a hierarchical organization of personality traits in terms of 5 basic dimensions
Conscientiousness
Agreeable
Neuroticism
Openness
Extraversion-introversion
Personality traits or personality dimensions
An integration of personality research that represents the various personality descriptions in one common framework
Individual differences in social and emotional life organized into a 5-factor model of personality
Found across a variety of cultures and using a number of languages
Permanence with Age: adults tend to maintain a consistent personality structure as they grow older
Personality relevant terms from dictionary
Lexical hypothesis: most of the socially relevant and salient personality characteristics have become encoded in the natural language
Allport and Odbert (1936): 18, 000 terms, identified 4 categories
Cattell (1943): broke 18, 000 down to subset of 4, 500 trait terms, then down to 35
Tupes and Christal (1961): through analysis found 5 factors
Places people according to their emotional stability and personal judgment
People with high scores are more vulnerable to anxiety and depression
Individuals with low scores tend to be calm and well adjusted
Places extreme extroverts at one end and extreme introverts at the other
Extroverts are very sociable
Introverts are reserved and independent people
Involves active imagination, divergent thinking, and intellectual curiosity
People on the high end are unconventional and independent thinkers
Individuals on the low end prefer the familiar rather than the imaginative
People with high scores are helpful, trusting, and sympathetic
Individuals with low scores tend to be antagonistic and skeptical
Debate about what the 5 factors mean
Disagreement about the structure of the 5 factor model
Researchers have looked into the stability of the 5 factors over time
When to use scores from Big Five measures vs scores from specific trait scales
Strengths:
Usage of objective measures to examine the constructs
Reduced level of the bias and subjectivity
Numerous practical applications
Educational psychologists and employers use trait measures in their work
Generated a large amount of research
Criticisms:
No explanations on how traits develop or how to help people who suffer from extreme scores
No schools of of psychotherapy have originated from the trait approach
Lack of an agreed-upon framework
Self Report Inventories
Asks people to respond to a series of questions about themselves
Widely used form of personality assessment
Have greater face validity
Used by researchers, personal managers, and clinical psychologists
1916-1998
Eysenck focused on normal and pathological populations
He felt that many traits are biologically based and were shaped by evolutionary forces (e.g., extraversion, neuroticism)
He used factor analysis to identify traits
Eysenck is not concerned with concepts of determinism vs free choice, optimism vs pessimism, and causality vs teleology
Biology over social influence
Conscious over unconscious
Uniqueness over similarity
Extraversion - Introversion
Introversion: tendermindedness; introspectiveness; seriousness; performance interfered with by excitement; easily aroused but restrained; inhibited; preference for solitary vocations’ sensitivity to pain
Extraversion: toughmindedness; impulsiveness; tendency to be outgoing; desire for novelty; performance enhanced by excitement; preference for vocations involving contact with other people; tolerance for pain
Research indicates that introverts and extroverts are not different at resting levels, but introverts are more reactive to moderate levels of simulation than extraverts
This work led by Eysenck to revise his theory – the difference between introverts and extroverts lies in arousability, not in baseline arousal
Neuroticism - Stability
Psychoticism - Superego Function
Eysenck views personality as a “hierarchy of traits.” He placed special emphasis on biological differences that occur along the extraversion-introversion dimension
Introverts have higher levels of physiological arousal causing them to avoid overly stimulating social situations
Extraverts have lower baseline levels of arousal and, thus, seek stimulation from social situations
Trait theorists aim to describe personality with a small number of traits or factors
Personality trait - stable quality a person shows across most situations
Surface Traits: features that make up the visible areas of personality
Source Traits: underlying traits of a personality; each reflected in a number of surface traits
Cattell also created 16PF, personality test
Gives a picture of an individual’s personality
Factor Analysis: technique employed by Raymond Cattell to determine the structure of human personality
Factor Analysis: technique employed by Raymond Cattell to determine the structure of human personality
Source Traits: basic traits that make up the human personality
Limitation: procedure is confined by the type of data chosen for analysis
The 5-factor model of personality is a hierarchical organization of personality traits in terms of 5 basic dimensions
Conscientiousness
Agreeable
Neuroticism
Openness
Extraversion-introversion
Personality traits or personality dimensions
An integration of personality research that represents the various personality descriptions in one common framework
Individual differences in social and emotional life organized into a 5-factor model of personality
Found across a variety of cultures and using a number of languages
Permanence with Age: adults tend to maintain a consistent personality structure as they grow older
Personality relevant terms from dictionary
Lexical hypothesis: most of the socially relevant and salient personality characteristics have become encoded in the natural language
Allport and Odbert (1936): 18, 000 terms, identified 4 categories
Cattell (1943): broke 18, 000 down to subset of 4, 500 trait terms, then down to 35
Tupes and Christal (1961): through analysis found 5 factors
Places people according to their emotional stability and personal judgment
People with high scores are more vulnerable to anxiety and depression
Individuals with low scores tend to be calm and well adjusted
Places extreme extroverts at one end and extreme introverts at the other
Extroverts are very sociable
Introverts are reserved and independent people
Involves active imagination, divergent thinking, and intellectual curiosity
People on the high end are unconventional and independent thinkers
Individuals on the low end prefer the familiar rather than the imaginative
People with high scores are helpful, trusting, and sympathetic
Individuals with low scores tend to be antagonistic and skeptical
Debate about what the 5 factors mean
Disagreement about the structure of the 5 factor model
Researchers have looked into the stability of the 5 factors over time
When to use scores from Big Five measures vs scores from specific trait scales
Strengths:
Usage of objective measures to examine the constructs
Reduced level of the bias and subjectivity
Numerous practical applications
Educational psychologists and employers use trait measures in their work
Generated a large amount of research
Criticisms:
No explanations on how traits develop or how to help people who suffer from extreme scores
No schools of of psychotherapy have originated from the trait approach
Lack of an agreed-upon framework
Self Report Inventories
Asks people to respond to a series of questions about themselves
Widely used form of personality assessment
Have greater face validity
Used by researchers, personal managers, and clinical psychologists