The course aims to provide knowledge about the development of Swedish labor policy post-World War II.
It will discuss fundamental changes from the 1970s, involving the labor market, welfare system, and economy.
The course will examine processes of change related to immigrants, women, and young people.
Course content includes:
Economic change and the Swedish labor market
Transition from school to work
Immigration and integration
Women in the labor market
Main objectives:
Learn about major changes in the Swedish labor market
Discuss reasons behind high labor force participation of women in Sweden
Develop familiarity with challenges faced by immigrants and young individuals
Sweden's population has shifted from rural to urban between 1800 and 2010.
There is a current population crisis characterized by low birth rates.
The 1920s experienced strong economic growth but high unemployment.
Responses to unemployment included relief jobs, emergency housing, and cash assistance.
This period was marked by labor market conflicts.
Key milestones:
1913: National pension
1919: 8-hour working day
1919: Female voting rights (first election in 1921)
Early 1930s saw high unemployment and conflicts, notably the Ådalen shootings in 1931 where five people died after military intervention.
This period shifted towards labor market peace, facilitated by the Saltsjöbaden Agreement (1938) between the Swedish Trade Union Confederation and the Swedish Employers Association.
The agreement is considered part of the Swedish model.
Political stability was achieved through Social Democratic dominance, active labor market policies (from 1946), improved pensions, and steps towards active family policies.
Significant social reforms were possible due to economic conditions.
There was labor immigration, particularly from the common Nordic labor market.
Keynesianism, state intervention, and an expensive welfare system were in place.
Real wages increased, and significant resources were allocated to active labor market policies.
Women’s participation in the workforce increase
Expansion of the public sector
Redistribution policies were implemented.
Women entered the labor market.
The public sector expanded.
Post-war, there were initial concerns about the economy, but increased demand from a rebuilding Europe led to increased production, especially in the defense industry.
Growth and wage increases were observed.
Several revaluations and devaluations of the Krona occurred:
1946: Revaluation
1949: Devaluation
1976: Devaluation
1977: Devaluation (twice)
1981: Devaluation
1982: Devaluation
The oil crisis caused concern and disruption of global economies.
The Krona was overvalued, making exports expensive and affecting competitiveness.
Several industries, such as shipbuilding, faced crises.
Sweden devalued the Krona, leading to higher domestic inflation.
Continued growth occurred during the 1980s.
A serious crisis occurred in the early 1990s, with increased unemployment.
1994: Referendum on joining the EU (Yes 52%)
1995: Sweden joined the European Union (EU).
Relatively high growth occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
The financial crisis of 2008 impacted Sweden, leading to economic challenges.
Unemployment rates rose, accompanied by a brief downturn in GDP.
Average annual GDP growth rate: approximately 2.5% (slightly lower than the 3% average in the 2000s).
Unemployment Rate:
Decreased from 7.5% in 2013 to 6.5% in 2023.
Sectoral Growth:
Industry sector: Contributed 18% to GDP in 2013, increased to 20% by 2023.
Service sector: Remained the largest contributor to GDP, with consistent growth of around 3% annually.
Technology sector: Experienced rapid growth, with an average annual growth rate of 5%.
1900 – 1930: Conflict
1930 – 1950: Peace and stability
1950s – 1970s: Economic growth
1980s – 1990s: Crisis in industry, early 1990s crisis, EU membership
2000s: 2008 crisis, growth in service and technology sectors
Population censuses began in 1749.
The 1930s were marked by a population crisis and low birth rates due to high unemployment, widespread poverty, and overcrowded living conditions.
Alva and Gunnar Myrdal (1934) highlighted these issues in their book "Crisis in the Population Question," advocating for welfare expansion and family support.
The 1940s saw a baby boom (1943-1949 in Sweden, continuing until the mid-1960s in the USA) due to increased marriages and confidence in the Swedish economy.
In the 1960s, fertility rates rose further, and maternity leave was extended from three to six months in 1963.
From the late 1960s to the mid-1980s, fertility rates declined again due to increased female participation in the workforce and changing gender roles.
The crisis years of the 1990s saw a robust economy initially, with a total fertility rate (TFR) of 2.1 in 1991.
During the crisis years, birth rates plummeted, reaching a TFR of 1.5 in 1999, the lowest ever recorded.
Sweden serves as an example of how population responds to economic fluctuations.
1960s – 1980s: Decline in TFR due to increasing female workforce participation and access to better birth control methods.
1990s: Upswing in TFR attributed to a strong economy and changes in family policy.
Late 1990s: Downturn in TFR linked to economic downturn, higher education, and delayed childbearing.
2000s – 2010: TFR increased.
In 2022, TFR was 1.52, close to the lowest observed.
Historical context:
Until 1880: 4.5 children per woman
Currently: 1.5 children per woman (replacement level 2.1)
Economic Factors
Economic fluctuations impact TFR, with downturns often leading to lower birth rates due to financial insecurity and delayed family planning.
Strong economies may encourage higher birth rates as families feel more confident about their financial stability.
Societal and Cultural Shifts
Changing gender roles: More women are pursuing higher education and careers, leading to delayed childbirth.
Urbanization: People living in cities often prioritize careers and lifestyle over having large families.
Lifestyle and Personal Choices
Prioritizing personal freedom: Many individuals prefer traveling, personal development, and other experiences over parenthood.
Delayed marriage and relationships: Many people are marrying later, reducing their reproductive years.
Government Policies (or Lack of Support)
Weak family support policies: Countries with minimal parental leave, childcare support, and housing assistance see lower birth rates.
Lack of incentives: Some governments offer financial incentives, but they are often not enough to encourage higher birth rates.
Biological and Health Factors
Increased infertility rates: Rising infertility due to lifestyle factors (stress, diet, environmental issues) makes it harder for couples to conceive.
Access to contraception: More people have access to birth control and can plan pregnancies better.
Global Uncertainty
Climate change and environmental concerns: Some people fear bringing children into a world facing environmental crises.
Political instability: Economic downturns, wars, and social unrest make people hesitant to start families.
Foreign-born women exhibit higher fertility rates, especially shortly after immigration.
Despite higher initial rates, long-term trends suggest convergence between foreign-born and Swedish-born women’s fertility rates.
Attitudes
Uncertain future
House prices
An increasing life expectancy.
Later entry into the job market for young people.
Raise the retirement age.
Increased taxation, employment, and productivity.
The number of taxpayers increases, which is necessary to finance welfare (healthcare).
With an increase in the retirement age to 69 by 2050, there may be no need to cut welfare.
Can we work longer? Is it physically feasible?
Potential cutbacks in other areas.
Private alternatives, such as private healthcare.
Potential increases in taxes on capital and property.
Challenges included extended working hours and reduced vacation time.
From the 1970s, immigrants have had lower employment rates.
The foreign-born were hit hardest by the 90s crisis.
At the same time, the number of refugees increased.
In the 1990s, 40-50% of social payments went to immigrant households.
A labor market with a before and after 1930s.
High economic growth after WWII (industrial sector).
1980s: crisis in industry, economy; growth in service and technology sectors.
Demographic change and population shifts from the baby boom in the 1940s to low fertility and an aging population.
Shift from emigration to immigration.
Inequality in the labor market.
"Middle way" or "third way."
Active state:
sizable public sector (social service)
labor market policies (employment)
income and wealth distribution
relatively ‘women-friendly’ welfare state
1930s-1940s: origins (ideology)
1950s-1970s: rise and golden age
Restrictive fiscal and monetary policy (curbing inflation).
A large privately owned industrial sector.
A strong trade union movement with compromise between capital and labor.
1930s-1940s: Origins
1950s-1970s: Rise and golden age
1970s-1990s: Imbalances and crisis
1996-Today: Redefined Swedish Model
Private enterprise.
Strict public controls and regulations.
Comprehensive welfare systems.
Social Democrats continuously in government 1932-1976.
Per Albin Hansson’s folkhemmet (People’s home): “In the good home there is equality, consideration, cooperation and helpfulness”.
Export boom (machinery, ships, electronic goods).
Restrictive fiscal and monetary policy to curb inflation and ensure full employment.
Active Labor Market Policy (ALMP) promoting occupational and geographical mobility and reduced work capacity.
Extensive social services – a strong social safety net.
Increased taxation.
Strong organizations (unions, employer organizations).
Collective agreements instead of legislation.
Centralized and coordinated negotiations promoting solidarity and wage policy.
Long-term effects of the 1991-1994 crisis including a banking, financial, and real estate crisis with abruptly falling property prices.
Credit market regulations (from 1985 no restrictions lending).
Savings of two banks from bankruptcy by the state.
Currency crisis involving a fixed exchange rate and currency speculation leading to failing public finances.
Unemployment:
1990: 1.4%
1993: 9% (low skilled hit extra hard)
More households depended on benefits.
Lower employment rate.
Demographic changes (aging population).
Broke a continuous expansion of social security systems.
1951: Annual Leave Act (Three weeks)
1962: Education Act “one-school-for-all”
1955: Universal health insurance
1957: Pension reform (ATP)
1964: Public Housing Program -”The million program”
1974: Parental Leave (men and women)
1978: Annual Leave Act (Five Weeks)
Devaluations of SEK: 1976, 1977, 1981, 1982.
Internal and external factors.
Social insurance system preserved and public provision of health and social care even expanded.
Move towards economic liberalization since 1980s.
Swedish model not questioned during the 1980s.
Historical solutions to societal problems.
Focus on lowering benefits, shorter benefit periods, and stricter controls.
Otto von Bismarck's Germany (1880s):
Sickness benefit
Healthcare
Pensions
“Bismarck model” (or Insurance Model)
1911: Sickness benefit and primary care (England)
1913: National Pension System (Sweden)
Family and Kinship roles.
The Swedish Empire or the Great Power era (17th and early 18th century):
A ban on begging
All parishes must care for their poor
Poor laws: 1788, 1847, 1871, 1918
Social Aid Act: 1956
1913: National Pension system– not based on poverty.
1928: Per-albin Hansson’s People’s Home Speech - “Folkhemmet” (People’s Home) promoting social solidarity and welfare policies.
1935 : Imported pension
1938 : Law on vacation (two weeks). 1937/1948 : Child allowance
1955 : Universal healthcare - Beveridge model (tax funded)
Selective: Benefits provided to specific groups or individuals most in need (Means-tested benefits : 1913 Pension and 1937 Child allowance).
Universal: All citizens regardless of income, need, or other criteria (1955 Universal healthcare and 1948 child allowance).
Bismarck model (or Insurance Model).
Beveridge model (tax funded– high degree of public provision of welfare).
Favorable economic conditions.
Reforms in family policy aimed at population growth.
Child Allowance in 1948
Maternity assistance in the 60s-70s.
Economic growth years saw a demand for female labor force participation prioritized gender equality and neutrality.
Abolishment of joint taxation in 1971.
Abortion law in 1974.
Sterilization law in 1975.
1980s & 1990s
Declining economic growth limited opportunities for reforms
Critique of Family and Gender Equality Policies addressed were persisting gender disparities such as lower wages for women, increased domestic responsibilities, and gender-segregated labor market.
Economic Crisis of the 1990s
Decreases nativity (birth rates) and female labor force participation due to economic downturn.
Growing income disparities among families with children, disproportionately affecting children in single-parent households and children with immigrant backgrounds.
Focus on real wage increases and employment.
An important part of industrialized society.
Forbidden according to Swedish legislation until 1864.
Swedish Typographer Associations (1886).
The Swedish Trade Union Confederation -LO (1898) → today 1.5 million members.
The Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees - TCO (1931) → 1.2 million members.
The Swedish Confederation of Professional Associations –SACO (1947) → 600,000 members.
Political factors.
Ideology, solidarity with one’s own group.
Institutional factors including collective agreements which maintain high coverage (the Ghent system– welfare payments (such as unemployment insurance) through unions).
Collective agreements remain strong but face challenges with free movement within the EU.
Increasing trend of income inequality, regional inequality, and inequality of opportunity where foreign-born pupils are lagging behind.
A critical period in the life of young people involving change, uncertainty, and waiting impacting wellbeing and economic prospects.
Allocation of human resources shaped by demand for labor.
The lottery of birth including no control on birth country, family, gender, or school (zip code).
Allocation of wages adjusts to align individual & societal interests.
Main determinants include individual background, education, ability, motivation, and expectation.
Difficult to separate in empirical analyses due to double skill-bias where education and experience must both be considered alongside Macroeconomic conditions.
Macroeconomic conditions
*Youth employment tends to be super cyclical but this does not fully explain cross-country differences (Ryan 2001).
Example 1 – Centralized pay coordination (i.e. minimum wages, Krugman 1994) where the wage effect is seen in the UK and US and the employment effect is seen in Sweden and France.
Example 2 – National school to work institutions (apprenticeship in Germany).
When does youth start? Official statistics use:
Age 15–24 or 15–29 BUT.. Longer education + life expectancies lead to the redefinition of “Youth”.
Age of establishment in Sweden:
Age when 75% of a cohort is employed (see Olofsson 2005).
1987 → 21 years old.
2005 → 27 years old.
Labor Force Participation: LFP = \frac{Employed + Unemployed}{Population}
Youth NEET rate is a broad measure of the underutilization of youth, who could potentially contribute to national development and growth through their work or by furthering their qualifications in education (ILO 2017).
Unemployment Rate = \frac{Unemployed}{Employed + Unemployed}
Unemployment ≠ Jobless.
NEET = Neither in Employment nor in Education and Training ( = Better measure of youth inactivity … except if on holiday).
Sharp decline in youth LFP:
↓ 12% points between 1999 and 2019 (ILO, 2020) with the Smallest change where in Central & Western Asia (before in Sub-Saharan Africa)).
Good or bad?
Depends on activities and reasons but the largely reflect rising education rates.
Youth unemployment rate : Roughly constant since 2009 (ILO, 2020) with Youth = over-represented among total unemployed also Youth = more strongly hit by long-term unemployment and Young people = 3x more likely to be unemployed. Large regional differences.
Emerging economies = worse trend
In 2024 : 20.4% of global youth are NEET – 13.1% Male; 28.1% Female and 11.3% of young people in Europe are NEET – 10.1% Male; 12.5% Female.
The statistic crude and mask important aspects of youth employment opportunities
Very different incidence for different regions of the world - Quality of Employment is important.
Young workers = over-represented among working poor where Working poor = people who work but live below poverty line and Young workers = more frequently in informal labor markets.
3 out of 4 young workers.
Transition from school → Stable employment where Stable employment = contract > 12 months (or satisfactory temporary employment) with the Focus kept on individual youth’s experiences.
Transition depends on cumulative factors over life span so Different trajectories Can be used to identify issues in labor markets.
Transition differs by country’s level of development:
Least developed countries → lower % of young workers in stable occupation and Stable employment vs. self-employment have great disparities
How does education affect length of transition?
Long education = short transition
Alignment of skills to demand determines transition lengths
Mismatch occurs due to over and under qualification situations
A combination Work-study can shorten the transitionGerman apprenticeships can be used as a model
Determinants of Success:
* Individual characteristics
* Macroeconomic conditions
* Frictions in labor markets
* Cultural barriers
* Institutional frameworks
Determinant of employment prospects for young adults: Education
Vocational education
General education
Apprenticeship
Vocational education vs. General education Vocational education = oriented towards acquiring skills directed to a specific job
e.g. Denmark, some Eastern European countries General education = more general → less applied skills (e.g. US, UK)
Apprenticeship vs. Full time schooling = Mass apprenticeship requires strong institutions to support it. Problem = investing in training is risky as other employers might benefit- Example Germany
Part time vocational education = coupled with apprenticeships - Unions accept low paid apprenticeship
Vocational Education among upper secondary pupils
State Central Model: School based vocational education, Influenced by labour market organizations
Anglo-Saxon Model: Primarily generalized education, Training seen as a voluntarily responsibility
EU – Challenges and Policies after 2008 Crisis – for new labor market entrants During the recession
Afterwards: