THEMES:
Intro to Motivation
Instinct Theory and Evolutionary Psychology
Homeostasis and Drive Theory
Incentives and Expectancy Theories
Psychodynamic and Humanistic Theories
Intro to Motivation
Motivation → Process that influences goal-directed behaviour, it influences direction, persistence, and vigour as well
Instinct Theory and Evolutionary Psychology
Based on Darwin’s Theory of Evolution → Instinct motivates behaviour
Instinct → Inherited predisposition to behave a certain way in response to certain stimuli (predictable)
Genetic
Found among all members of a species
Independent of learning
Based on survival of the organism
Proposed numerous (thousands) instincts in humans
Not widely accepted
Circular reasoning (Why are people greedy → Greed is a instinct → How do we know greed is an instinct → People are greedy)
Instinct Theory 2.0 → Modern Evolutionary Psychology view
Psychological motives based on evolution
Genes related to behaviours that increase chances of survival and reproduction
Adaptive significance
Homeostasis and Drive Theory
Homeostasis → Internal physiological equilibrium that the body strives to maintain
Delicate balance ensures survival
Applied to thirst, hunger, body temp, weight, sleep, etc.
DRIVE THEORY
Drive Theory → Physiological disruptions to homeostasis produce drives
States of internal tension
Motivate behaviour to reduce the tension
Drive pushes organisms into action eg. when you’re thirsty, you get a drink
Less influential - people behave contrary to its predictions (diets, horror movies, etc.)
Incentives and Expectancy
INCENTIVE THEORY
Incentive → Something that motivates or encourages an organism to do something (want not need)
Unlike the “push” of Drive Theory, incentives provide a “pull” towards a goals eg. getting a good grade, winning a trophy
Incentive Theories Today → Focus on the “pull” of external stimuli, even in the absence of biological need eg. full but still want dessert
Stimuli have an incentive value → higher value of stimuli = want it more
Applied to understanding drug abuse
People with drug abuse problems continue to use it because of the incentive of what the drug will do for them
Incentive theory → using heroin to get high again (addiction)
Drive theory (withdrawal) → using heroin again during withdrawal, reduces withdrawal, to maintain homeostasis of that high)
People often respond differently to the same incentive
Leads to different incentive theories that are akin to classical conditioning
Expectancy theories employ the cognitive perspective
EXPECTANCY THEORY
Expectancy Theory → (motivation = expectancy x incentive value)
Adds expectancy to incentive value for motivation
Employs the cognitive perspective
Goal-directed behaviours driven by:
Strength of expectation that behaviour will lead to a goal
Value that person places on goal (incentive value)
Different people have different strengths of expectation and different values that they place on goals)
TYPES OF MOTIVATION
Intrinsic Motivation → Performing an activity for its own sake
Motivated to perform an activity for its own sake and personal rewards
Eg. Playing piano just for fun
Extrinsic Motivation → Performing an activity to obtain external reward or to avoid punishment
Motivated to perform an activity to earn a reward or avoid punishment
Eg. Playing piano for money
Psychodynamic and Humanistic Theories
PSYCHODYNAMIC THEORY
Freud proposed that most behaviour came from unconscious impulses and psychological defences
Impulses naturally want to be expressed
Defences want to keep impulses ‘at bay’
Conflict produces energy that needs to be released, instead it’s funnelled into socially acceptable outputs
Strongest drives = sex and aggression
eg. Someone with strong aggressive impulses would have a career they could funnel the aggression into, like a lawyer or athlete
Freud’s “dual-instinct” model was not supported but led to other theories
Modern theories emphasize the role of unconscious motive and tensions, in addition to conscious processes
Stress motives for self-esteem and social belonging
HUMANISTIC THEORY
Humanistic Theory → People are motivated to perform actions by the desire to meet certain needs
Abraham Maslow
Other perspectives ignored the motivation of striving for personal growth
Remember the humanistic perspective says “hey guys why are we looking at other places, why can’t we just want something for ourselves, why can’t we just want to be our best self, that’s us"
He helped describe 2 categories of needs:
Deficiency Needs → Things concerned with physical and social survival
Growth Needs → Unique to humans; push us to develop our potential
Deficiency and growth needs were arranged on a need hierarchy
Deficiency needs → Bottom
Growth needs → Top
Basically once you satisfy your basic physiological needs, you can work on the next ‘tier’ of needs
End goal = Self-Actualization (reaching full potential)
Physiological needs → Safety needs → Belongingness/Love needs → Esteem needs -? Cognitive needs → Aesthetic needs → Self-Actualization
Questioning the hierarchy → Society changes what we need and how we prioritize things
Self-Actualization is a vague goal (never enough??)
Doesn’t explain behaviours that go against the ranking of needs (hungry but dieting, POW enduring torture to protect comrades)
SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY
Self-determination theory focuses on internal sources of motivation, including a need for personal growth and fulfillment
Combination of psychodynamic and humanistic views
Three components:
Competence → Reflects human need to master challenges and perfect skills, exploratory growth-inducing behaviour
Autonomy → Self-determination, people want to experience their actions as a result of free choice without outside interference
Relatedness → The want to form meaningful bonds with others
They all influence each other and happen all at once.
If your family supports (relatedness) who you are as a person (autonomy), than you are likely to have a better relationship with your family (competence)
This theory fits better with human behaviour than hierarchy of need
Hunger as a Motive
Hunger is a basic biological drive
Drive Theory → Biology provides a “push”
Incentive Theory → Anticipation and expectation of flavour provide a “pull”
SIGNALS THAT START A MEAL
Hunger “pangs” (muscular contractions) correlate with feelings of hunger but is not the cause
We experience hunger and fullness even if nerves from stomach to brain are severed
Pattern of increase and decrease in blood glucose levels
Decline in blood glucose levels over time
Liver converts stored nutrients into glucose
Causes blood glucose levels to rise
This cycle generates feelings of hunger
Ghrelin → Peptide that signals hunger and is secreted by stomach and small intestine
SIGNALS THAT END A MEAL
Leptin → Hormone secreted by fat cells
More fat cells = more leptin
Signals brain to decrease appetite and increase energy expenditure
Genetically obese mice do not use Leptin
Obese because there’s no signal to decrease appetite and energy expenditure
Leptin injections help
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS
Eating is positively reinforced by good tastes
Eating is negatively reinforced by hunger reduction
Expectations that eating will be pleasurable and will reduce hunger, stimulate eating
Beliefs, memories, and attitudes about food can also direct eating
Pressures for thinness
Cultural standards of beauty
Overestimation of thinness for attractiveness
Throughout much of Western history a full-bodied woman’s figure was esteemed
Leads to eating restrictions and disorders
Women overestimate how thin they need to be, men overestimate how bulky they need to be → People negatively view themselves which lead to a. negative view of food which can be dangerous
Objectification Theory → Viewing body as object
Western society teaches this mostly regarding women, increases body shame and anxiety
OBESITY
Genetic Influences
Genes influence basal metabolism
Tendency to store energy as fat or lean tissue is genetic
40-70% of body mass is related to genetics
Genes haven’t changed and haven’t caused the increase of obesity
Environmental Influences
Inexpensive, tasty foods high in fat and/or carbohydrates
“Supersizing” due to cultural value of getting best value
Decreased daily activity due to technological advances
Sexual Motivation
Another kind of motivation that is studied
Why do people have sex? (Motivations)
Reproduction
Pleasure (obtain and give)
Express love and intimacy
Duty
Conforming to peer pressure
Culture and environment affect the way sex and sexuality is viewed
PORNOGRAPHY
Pornography, sexual violence and attitudes
Statistics Canada has reported that 39% of adult Canadian women have had at least one experience of some form of sexual assault
Only 18% of perpetrators are strangers
Authority figures is only 6% but is theorized to be very underreported
Theories (aren’t supported by research)
Social Learning Theory predictions:
Learning through observation → coercion and dominance are acceptable, viewers should become sexually aggressive
Catharsis Theory predictions:
Freudian concepts of inborn aggression
Viewing pornography provides ‘safe’ outlet
Pornography doesn’t have a causal relationship to aggression
SEXUAL ORIENTATION
Sexual Orientation → Emotional and erotic preference for partners of particular sex
Uni-dimensional View → ‘Exclusively Heterosexual’ to ‘Exclusively Homosexual’
Not accurate because there are so many more sexual orientations
Current view → Three dimensions
Self-identity
Sexual attraction
Actual sexual behaviour
More men and women report same-sex activity than view themselves as homosexual or bisexual
Some people view themselves as heterosexual even though they experience same-sex attraction and have had sex with the same-sex → Things don’t always have to match up
Determinants:
Early theories (no longer valid)
Differences in sex hormones
Ineffectual father, domineering mother
Seduction by adult homosexual
Current theories
Hereditary predisposition (doesn’t make sense biologically)
Other causal factors— biological, psychological, and environmental— are still debated
Lady Gaga’s theory → You’re born that way
We don’t understand why
Evidence for genetics:
Concordance rates higher among MZ than DZ twins or adoptive brothers
Alternating exposure to prenatal hormones can influence sexual orientation
Limitation → Findings are correlational (not causal)
Other factors: Personality style and socialization, may be multiple paths that differ
Achievement Motivation
Need for achievement → Desire for accomplishment and excellence, stable personality characteristic, individual differences
People are motivated to succeed because of → Motive for success, fear of failure
ACHIEVEMENT GOAL THEORY
Focuses on the manner in which success is defined both by the individual and within the achievement situation itself
Achievement is available to everyone, but motivation and value of achievement is subjective
Mastery Orientation → being the best
Intrinsic motivation
Desire to master tasks, learn knowledge, and obtain skills
Performance orientation → being seen as the best
Desire to be judged favourably compared to others with as little effort as possible
External motivation
People with a high fear of failure
Have Performance-Approach goals → Desire to be judged favourably compared to others
Have Performance-Avoidance goals → Desire to avoid negative judgements, over-prepare/overthink to the point where it impairs performance
People may have either an approach or avoidance focus to master and performance goals
Approach
Mastery → Master the task, learn, understand, improve
Performance → Win, be the best, be noticed
Avoidance
Avoid mistakes, misunderstanding, poor quality
Avoid losing looking bad, being last
High-need achievers → Need to be the best, never feel like the reach the top
Ambitious
Persist longer at difficult task, they won’t give up
Perform best when conditions are challenging, if things are too easy they don’t get motivated (anyone can do it, there’s no point)
Some people will strive harder for success when they perceive:
That they are responsible for the outcome
There is a risk of not succeeding
There will be potential feedback
The situation has an intermediate chance of success, rather than a very high/low chance of success
MOTIVATIONAL CONFLICT
Approach-approach Conflict
“I want this AND I want that!”
Conflict where you have to decide between two desirable of attractive goals, as one goal is approached, desirability increases and dominates
Avoidance-avoidance Conflict
“I don’t want this AND I don’t want that”
Two goals, both of which are negative eg. wash the dishes or clean the yard
Approach-avoidance Conflict
“I want this BUT I don’t want what this entails” eg. I don’t want to clean the litter-box, but I want a cat
Being repelled and attracted by the same goal
Most difficult to resolve!
Delay Discounting
Consequences are in the future
Have decrease in value of incentive
Further away in time = greater decrease in value
People will choose what has consequences in the future
Emotions
Mental states or feelings associated with our evaluation of our experiences
Positive or negative feelings (affect) states
Pattern of cognitive, physiological, and behavioural reactions
Link between motivation and emotion
React when goals are gratified, threatened, or frustrated
Strong reaction to important goals
Emotions direct attention
Negative emotions → Narrow attention, increase physiological activation
Positive emotions → Broaden thinking, exploration, and skill learning
Social communication
Information about internal state
Influence others’ behaviour towards us
Emotions are responses to eliciting stimuli
Emotions result from cognitive appraisal of the stimuli
Bodies respond physiologically to stimuli
Emotions include behavioural tendencies, including expressive behaviours and instrumental behaviours
Eliciting Stimuli → A stimuli that precedes a certain behaviour and causes a response
Can be internal (thought, physical condition) or external (reward, punishment, event)
Influence of innate biological factor (come naturally)
Newborn infants can respond emotionally
Adults primed to respond to evolutionary significant stimuli
Learning → Previous experiences can affect current emotional experience, eg. negative experience → phobias
Cognitive Appraisal → Subjective interpretation/evaluation of eliciting stimuli
Involved in all aspects
Allows for interpretation and evaluation of sensory stimuli
Influences expressions and actions
Different reactions to same event
Is there an effect of culture on how we analyze these external and internal eliciting stimuli and how we respond to them?
Cultural similarities in appraisals for basic emotions
Cultural differences in appraisals of other emotions
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES
Physiological Responses → Interactions between cortical and subcortical structures
Hypothalamus, amygdala, hippocampus
Destruction or stimulation of these areas can produce aggression
Cerebral cortex → Prefrontal cortex = ability to regulate emotion
Sensory input → Thalamus → Cerebral cortex then Amygdala or to Amygdala first
Dual Pathway of Emotion
Thalamus sends sensory input along two independent neural pathways:
One directly to amygdala → Emotional & behavioural reaction
One to cerebral cortex → Conscious interpretation
Amygdala → can process input before interpretation by cortex
Removal of visual cortex in rats did not impair classically conditioned fear response → Meaning you don’t need to see stuff to be scared of it because of the amygdala
People with hippocampal damage (unable to learn a connection between CS and UCS) still acquire a fear response → even though they don’t go through classical conditioning, which is the typical way people acquire fear, because sometimes things bypass the cortex, which is where CC happen, instead it just happens in the amygdala
Hemispheric Activation
Some evidence for left hemisphere being more active with positive emotions
Some evidence for right hemisphere being more active with negative emotions
Autonomic Responses
The idea behind polygraphs, shows the responses of autonomic nervous system
EXPRESSIVE BEHAVIOURS
Observable displays of emotions → Facial expressions
Allows us to infer the emotions of others
Expressive behaviours that we can read and react accordingly to
Predate language → probably a product of evolution, recognize how someone else is feeling helps increase survival
Can be used to evoke sympathy
Fundamental Emotional Patterns
Expression of certain emotions - similar across variety of cultures
Children blind from birth can express basic emotions as sighted children do, eg. smiling when happy, crying when sad
Evolutionary view
Certain emotions are innate
Emotions can be modified by learning
Hierarchy of Emotions
Universal → Positive and negative affect, first to appear
Basic → Appear later, learned early on and developed from universal emotions
Subtle → Learn as we age, highly influenced by culture, derived from basic emotions
Facial Expressions
Judging emotion is best with context
General agreement across cultures
Woman generally more accurate
Introverts more accurate → they observe more
Emotions are universal, expressions are subjective
Effect of culture
Cultural display rules
Dictate when and how particular emotions are to be expressed
Innate biological factors and culture shape emotional expression
Instrumental behaviours
Behaviours to achieve a specific goal
Our emotions function as a call to action for these behaviours okay they help to optimize the arousal
Help enforce and enhance performance for simple tasks
Interfere with complex tasks eg. too excited to focus on the details need for higher performance
Task complexity increases → Arousal for maximum performance decreases
In the Brain
Prefrontal asymmetry in activation
Greater left prefrontal activity with positive affect
Greater right prefrontal activity with negative affect, lower immune system → Immune system decreases with negative emotions (longer periods of sadness, anger, depression)
THEORIES OF EMOTION
Evolutionary Theories of Emotion → Assume that emotions precede thought; these theories posit that emotions are innate, universal, and serve adaptive functions.
Discrete Emotions Theory → Assumes that humans experience only a small number of biologically-rooted and evolutionarily-useful “primary” emotions that are combined in complex ways to produce the full range of human emotion; assumes that emotional reactions precede thoughts.
Primary Emotions → Innate, biologically-rooted, universal emotions: Happiness, Sadness, Surprise, Anger, Disgust, Fear
Evolutionary basis of emotion
Cultural basis of emotion
Two types of emotion that play into how we express them
Humans experience a small number of distinct emotions, even if they combine in complex ways → Complex emotions
Newborn infants smile during REM sleep (innate)
Adaptive significance of motor reactions to emotions such as disgust, fear, anger, eg. Fear: Open our eyes wide to get a lot of information in
People recognize and can generate the same facial and emotional expressions across culture
Cognitive Theories of Emotion → Assume that thoughts produce emotions; these theories posit that emotions arise out of the interpretation of bodily arousal or the external context.
Emotions are products of thinking rather than the other way around
No discrete emotions (as many emotions as there are kinds of thoughts)
James-Lange Theory → Emotions result from our interpretations of our bodily reactions to stimuli
Cannon-Bard Theory → An emotion-provoking event leads simultaneously to an emotional and bodily reaction
Somatic Marker Theory → We use our “gut reactions” to gauge how we should act
Two-Factor Theory → Emotions are produced by an undifferentiated arousal (alertness, physiological), with an attribution of that arousal (label)
Unconscious Influences on Emotion
Automatic generation and facial feedback
Many emotional reactions may be generated automatically
Subliminal exposure to positive or negative cues influence mood
Mere exposure effect and liking more familiar stimuli
Facial Feedback Hypothesis → You are more likely to feel emotions that correspond to your facial features
Muscular feedback to the brain plays a key role in emotional experience
Has supporting research, but could be due to classical conditioning