The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates nearly all electronic media in the US.
Includes content regulation, cell phone providers, cell companies, and long-distance companies.
The FCC has extensive power due to its regulation of radio technology.
Print media is the primary exception, generally not regulated by the FCC.
Rationale for Broadcast Media Restrictions
Limited Spectrum/Spectrum Scarcity:
The Supreme Court justifies greater speech restrictions on broadcast media due to limited usable frequencies in a given area.
Without regulation, a small group could monopolize and control broadcast content.
The FCC, with Supreme Court approval, regulates broadcasters more strictly than other media.
Spectrum scarcity is a technological reality where the number of usable broadcast frequencies is limited, leading to restricted access for potential broadcasters.
FCC Power Over Indecent Content
The FCC has the power to ban indecent program content on broadcast media, even if it is not obscene.
This power is specifically for broadcast media; it does not extend to the Internet, satellite, or cable.
The rationale for restricting speech is spectrum scarcity, which exists only in broadcast media.
Other media (Internet, satellite, cable) are not subject to the same limitations because they don't use a limited number of broadcast frequencies.
First Amendment Protection and Strict Scrutiny
Cable and satellite stations have full First Amendment protection due to the absence of spectrum scarcity.
If the FCC or Congress wanted to ban indecent content on cable or satellite, they would have to meet strict scrutiny.
Strict Scrutiny: Requires a compelling governmental interest to justify content-based restrictions on communication, usually resulting in the government losing the case.
The Internet also has full First Amendment protections.
George Carlin Case
A radio station broadcast George Carlin's comedy routine featuring words that cannot be said on TV or radio.
The FCC fined the radio station, not George Carlin.
Carlin had a First Amendment right to perform the routine as stand-up, and the recording and sale of the comedy album were protected speech.
The issue arose when the radio station played the routine on the air, making it an FCC matter.
The Supreme Court upheld the FCC's actions, citing spectrum scarcity and the pervasiveness of broadcast media, particularly its accessibility to children.
Safe Harbor
The FCC has a "safe harbor" period from 10 PM to 6 AM, during which indecency regulations are relaxed.
This is based on the presumption that children are less likely to be watching TV or listening to the radio during these hours.
Fairness Doctrine
The Fairness Doctrine required broadcasters to present controversial issues and include contrary viewpoints.
The FCC eliminated this doctrine a long time ago.
The Supreme Court upheld the Fairness Doctrine based on spectrum scarcity.
The spectrum scarcity rationale remains relevant even though the Fairness Doctrine is no longer in effect.
Equal Time Rules
Equal time rules apply during a specific window before elections (primaries and main elections).
Federal elections: 60 days before the election
Primaries: 45 days before the election
If a candidate receives airtime on a station during this window, all other candidates for the same election must be given the same amount of time.
Qualifications:
Applies only to legally qualified candidates (confirmed to be on the ballot).
Candidates can be charged for equal time at the lowest rate the station charges for that time slot to non-political advertisers.
Stations cannot edit or modify the content of what the candidate says.
Exceptions to Equal Time Rules
News interview programs (e.g., Face the Nation) and general news content do not trigger equal time rights.
These rules primarily cover political advertising.
If a station runs content that heavily endorses a candidate (outside of news), equal time may be required.
The FCC makes decisions about whether equal time needs to be honored in such cases.
"I Approve This Message"
FCC rules require political ads to include a statement indicating whether the candidate approves the message.
If the candidate doesn't voice their approval in the ad, it's assumed they did not approve it.
This rule was implemented to inform voters about which ads the candidate has specifically endorsed.
Internet Content Regulation
Congress cannot punish the posting of indecent, non-obscene content on the Internet.
The Internet is not subject to spectrum scarcity, so indecent content is protected.
The Supreme Court has struck down laws attempting to ban indecent or patently offensive material online.
Congress can prohibit obscene speech on the Internet, as it is not protected under the First Amendment.
Obscenity and the Miller Test
Obscene speech is unprotected if it meets the Supreme Court's test for obscenity, as set forth in Miller v. California.
The definition of obscenity is narrow, primarily involving hardcore pornography.
The government can regulate obscene speech without meeting strict scrutiny.
Cable Television Regulations
Cable television is not subject to spectrum scarcity.
Content-based restrictions on cable programs are subject to strict scrutiny.
Copyright Protection
Copyright protection attaches to an original work as soon as it is fixed in a tangible medium.
Registration is not required for copyright protection to begin.
First Sale Doctrine
The first sale doctrine allows the purchaser of a book (or other copyrighted work) to sell or rent that copy.
This is because the book becomes the property of the purchaser, who can dispose of it as they see fit.
This doctrine is limited to the specific copy that was purchased.
It puts potential infringers on notice that the work is protected.
Using the symbol can affect damages in infringement cases, especially for willful infringements.
Digital Transmission of Copyrighted Music
Copyright holders have the right to prevent the digital transmission of a song.
Congress amended the Copyright Act to clarify that peer-to-peer sharing of copyrighted material is infringement, addressing issues that arose with Napster.
Exclusive Rights of Copyright Holders
Copyright holders have exclusive rights to:
Reproduction (copying)
Performance
Distribution
Creation of Derivative Works
Digital Transmission
Derivative Works
A derivative work draws upon an original work and changes its medium or form of expression (e.g., a book made into a movie).
Transformative Fair Use
The distinction between a derivative work and a transformative fair use can be blurry.
Transformative use is judged by whether the original expression of the idea was technologically transformed into a different medium or form of expression.
What is Not Copyrightable?
An idea itself is not copyrightable.
Expression of an idea, however, can be copyrighted.
Copyrightable items include:
Sculptures
Sound Recordings
Dance Routines (if written down)
Duration of Copyright
For copyrights created after the 1976 Act, the duration is 70 years after the death of the creator/author.
After this period, the work enters the public domain, and no one can claim copyright.
Fair Use Defense
A fair use defense can be raised in cases where significant parts of a copyrighted song are used to create a parody or commentary.
Parody is a common example of fair use.
Kinko's and Copyright Infringement
Copy services like Kinko's cannot claim fair use if they copy copyrighted material for profit.
They must be careful to avoid enabling or participating in copyright infringement.
Many copy services have policies and signage to avoid copying copyrighted works.