SR

Corfe et al, 2020

Impacts of NoLo drinks on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms

  • survey found that of current and past drinkers of NoLo beverages, 50% reported that current alcohol consumption was unchanged as a result of consuming these drinks

    • and those that reported a change commonly found reduced levels of alcohol consumption (33% completely stopped drinking) rather than increased levels

    • where as only 6% increased

  • 32% consuming NoLo drinks do so on top of, not instead of, existing levels of alcoholic consumption

    • this is more prominent with heavy drinkers

    • 39% disagreed with this though

Research gaps!

  • future research is needed as data to direct and aid policy makers on consumer behaviour and thus, health outcomes

Consumption of NoLo

  • 21% of individuals consumed an alcohol-free drink the past 12 months

    • 21% more have consumed them but more than 12 months ago

Demographics of NoLo groups

Females are less likely than males to have consumed a NoLo drink.

• Those aged 18-34 are more likely to have consumed a NoLo drink, than those aged 35-54

and 55 and above.

• Those in the higher income socioeconomic groups are more likely to have consumed a

NoLo drink.

• Those with children under 18 in the household are more likely to have consumed a NoLo

drink.

• Drinkers are more likely than non-drinkers to have consumed an alcohol-free drink. 11%

of non-drinkers reported having an alcohol-free drink in the past 12 months.

• Consumption of NoLo drinks containing CBD is more skewed towards younger drinkers.

the ‘Alcohol harm Paradox’

  • refers to the fact that although higher income individuals drink more on average, alcohol harms are concentrated in lower income groups.30

  • Alcohol-specific death rates among men in the most deprived quintile of the population are 4.3 times higher than for men in the least deprived quintile.

  • For women, age-standardised death rates are 3.4 times higher.

  • Given the Alcohol Harm Paradox, the lower use of NoLo drinks by those in lower income socioeconomic groups might limit the potential for these drinks to reduce alcohol-related harms.

  • Among those that have never consumed NoLo drinks, the most commonly cited reasons were that individuals would prefer to drink a soft drink if not drinking alcohol (39%) and that individuals would rather consume a conventional alcoholic drink (35%).