Planned Budget: 500 lawns, $32,500 total expenses, $5,000 operating income.
Actual Results: 550 lawns, $6,004.50 net operating income.
Initial Comparison: Actual vs. Static Budget
Reveals variances (favorable or unfavorable).
Favorable variance: Actual revenue > planned revenue (good for revenue accounts).
Unfavorable variance: Actual expense > planned expense (bad for expense accounts).
Deficiencies of the static budget: It doesn't explain why variances occurred.
It is necessary to discern how much of the cost variances are due to higher activity and how much are due to cost control.
Flexible Budget Explained
Total variable costs change in direct proportion to changes in activity.
Total fixed costs remain unchanged within the relevant range.
Larry's Lawn Service Flexible Budget
Uses the same revenue and cost formulas as the static budget.
Inputs the actual level of activity (550 lawns).
Revenue: 75
eq 550 = $41,250.
Wages: 5,000 + (30
eq 550).
Variable expenses increase due to higher activity (higher q).
Fixed costs remain the same.
Example Question
What would the total wages and salaries cost be if the flexible budget was for 600 lawns?
5,000 + (30
eq 600) = $23,000
Activity Variance
Arises solely due to the difference between the actual level of activity and the level of activity from the planning budget.
Compares the flexible budget to the planning budget.
For Larry's Lawn Service: Compares the flexible budget based on 550 lawns to the planning budget based on 500 lawns.
Example: An increase in activity causes an unfavorable expense variance given the variable expenses will go up as a consequence of the increase.
Key point – we’re hopping the increase activity causes total revenue to exceed expenses i.e. 50 more lawns will lead to more money!
If activity and revenue increased by 10%, net operating income increases by more than that due to fixed costs.
Revenue and Spending Variances
Revenue Variance: Difference between actual revenue and flexible budget revenue.
Spending Variance: Difference between actual cost and flexible budget cost.
Compare actual results with the flexible budget.
Isolates revenue and spending variances separately from activity variances.
Reveals whether extra revenues make up for cost overruns.
Revenue spending variance = + favorable numbers – unfavorable ones. With a higher level of activity, firms may not do a great job controlling the consequences, leading to an unfavorable variance.
This process helps firms isolate whether the success came from good, strategic control of costs.
Performance Report
Combines activity variances with revenue and spending variances.
Typical Format:
Actual results compared to the flexible budget --> Revenue and spending variance.
Flexible budget compared to the planning budget --> Activity variance.
Overall variance broken down into activity and revenue/spending components.
Performance Reports in Non-Profit Organizations
More complex due to unpredictable and inconsistent funding inflows.
Funding sources include state funding (mixed), tuition/fees (variable), donations/endowments (tricky to predict).
Budgeting and performance reports are still important.
Performance Reports for Cost Centers
Focus on managing costs within a department.
Compares activity and spending variances.
Isolates the impact of changes in activity levels versus cost control efforts.
Flexible Budget with Multiple Cost Drivers
More than one cost driver may be needed to explain costs.
Cost formulas in the flexible budget can be adjusted.
Example: Larry adds hours for edging and trimming as a second cost driver (h).
Revenue: 75q + 25h.
Wage & Salary, Gas and Supplies, and other expense formulas would also be updated to factor in these different costs.
Common Errors in Performance Reports
Assuming all costs are fixed or all costs are variable.
Assuming All Costs are Fixed
Comparing the planning budget to actual results.
Faulty analysis because it doesn't account for changes in activity level.
Results in an "apples to oranges" comparison.
Assuming All Costs are Variable
Multiplying the planning budget by the percentage change in activity.
Doesn't factor in fixed costs.
Also faulty analysis.
Key Takeaways
Focus on the format of comparing actual vs. flexible (revenue/spending variances) and flexible vs. planning (activity variances).
Breaks down the total variance into activity and cost control components.