Consonants: Produced with substantial constriction - sometimes no air flow What are the consonant choices in English?
|
How are they articulated?
|
Approximants: vowel-like constants - accoustically similar to vowels but phonologically (show up in the same place as consonants) /w/ + /y/ → very similar to vowels /u/ and /I/ → semi-vowels or semi-consonants /l/ + /r(our one)/ - liquid approximants →it is very difficult for second language learners and children We apply source filter theory to understand their acoustics
What is the difference between [aia] : where you clearly hear 3 different vowels, and [aja] The only difference is the duration of the sound! The vowel holds it for a long time / This makes us perceive a difference between vowels and semi-vowels. Given they are so short in duration, we can use them in places of a syllable where you can only find consonants e.g. “yellow” “mellow” “bellow” Liquids have both rotics /r/ and laterals /l/ (airflow around the sides of the constriction) |
Nasals - they are considered nasal stops because there is complete closure of the oral cavity however instead of lowering the velum it stays lifted, allowing air to flow through the nasal cavity instead. Both liquids and nasals allow for air to flow from somewhere → so areodynamically, they are very similar. It is often that you will confuse a nasal for a liquid or viceversa However, nasals have anti-resonance that bounces back Nasals have a similar acoustic as that of vowels so we apply the same theory → a version of source filter theory (a bit more complicated). The length of the tube affects what sound we make! If the tube is shorter we end up with /ŋ/ since it is close to wear the air goes but if it is longer, we end up with /m/ as it resonates in the tube for longer. |
Fricatives Layers of fluid flow
Narrow constriction + same volume of fluid = increased pressure/velocity - if we have the same amount of fluid we need a faster flow and if we have fast flow the layers interact, break off and go in random directions AIR IS A FLUID THE SAME PRINCIPLE APPLIES - IF WE HAVE THE SAME AMOUNT OF AIR COMING OUT OF A SMALLER VOCAL TRACT, THE FLUID WILL HAVE TO MOVE FAST AND IT MOVES SO FAST THAT YOU GET TURBULENT FLOW = FRICATIVES!! WE CANT SEE BUT WE CAN HEAR AND IT CAUSES A STATIC SOUND THEY COME IN BOTH VOICED AND VOICELESS As the sound propegates from mouth to ear is also random, we get a random waveform The sound source for a fricative is essentially flat because of the nature of turbulent flow. You can still filter this since it is a flat amount of energy MANY DIFFERENT REPETITIONS OF SAYING THE SAME SOUND OVERLAYED - we can see “peaks” these will be the resonance of the distance in the cavity. As the constriction moves back we get earlier peaks because the cavity is getting further and further. ON A SPECTROGRAM it looks random and static depression of energy across different frequencies that has more energy in some areas because of how it is filtered. The resonance frequency is lower when the tube is longer Some fricatives are particular: sibilance - have higher amplitude - we naturally use sibilance to get attention or call the cat - this cmes from the fact that teh constriction is right behind the front teeth Voiced fricative: air flow from vibration and air flow from constriction |
Plosives - time is so important
FOR THE SOUND [B] = VOICED AND UNASPIRATED
The bursts are short intervals of direction occurring as the closure is released. The formants point to where there would be sound if there was sound |
VOICE ONSET TIMING (VOT) - vocal cord are not adducted Plosives are complete closure In order for voicing to occur, you need a pressure difference in the glotal - these two things are at odd with eachother since you can have flow if the vocal tract is closed. VOT the delay between the release of a plosive and then start of phonation of the following sound - so you have to take in the phases - if voicing occurs before the release this is a NEGATIVE VOT- if they happen at the moment of release = 0 VOT - voicing occurs after release = POSITIVE VOT The difference between these is how we chracterise difference VOICING IS ABOUT WHETHER THE VOCAL FOLDS ARE READY FOR VIBRATION WHEN THE BURST IS RELEASED -
Are the vocal folds vibrating while there is turbulence? [p] voiceless, aspirated The vocal folds are not ready to vibrate, air flows , turbulent air, = aspiration Voicing for stops is more difficult because it becomes more theoretical “would it occur” The way that the VOT continuum is used differs from language to language. The moment the lips are released voicing does not happen straight away English uses 0VOT for voiced consonant but spanish uses it for voiceless = misinterpretations coursework WEEK 6: production and perception - it is VOT that differentiates voicing for STOP consonants not whether voicing is occurring. For english it is near 0VOT PERCEPTIALLY SENEISTIVE TO SMALL PHONETIC CATEGORIES. BASED ON AERODYNAMIC DIFFERENCES. EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT IN THE PHONOLOGY OF THE LANAGUGAE |