Abnormal Psychology: Research Methods
Starts with a hypothesis or “educated guess”
Not all hypotheses are testable
Hypotheses in science are formulated so that they are testable
Research Design: a method to test hypotheses
Independent variable: the variable that causes or influences behavior
Dependent variable: the behavior influenced by the independent variable
Internal validity vs. external validity
Internal validity: extent to which results of a study are due to the independent variable
External validity: extent to which results of a study are generalizable to the population it’s studying
Ways to increase internal validity by minimizing confounds
Use of control groups
Use of random assignment procedures
Use of analogue models
Statistical methods – branch of mathematics
Helps to protect against biases in evaluating data
Statistical vs. clinical significance
Statistical significance – asks are results due to chance?
Clinical significance – asks are results clinically meaningful?
Statistical significance does not imply clinical meaningfulness
Balancing statistical versus clinical significance
Evaluate effect size
Evaluate social validity
Case study method
Extensive observation and detailed description of a single client
Foundation of early historic developments in psychopathology
Limitations
Lacks scientific rigor and suitable controls
Internal validity is typically weak
Often entails numerous confounds
Correlation: assess the degree to which levels of certain variables are linked to levels of other variables
The nature of correlation
Statistical relation between two or more variables
No independent variable is manipulated
Range from –1.0 to 0 to +1.0
Negative vs. positive correlation
Necessary in situations where you can’t manipulate variables
Limitations
Does not imply causation
Problem of directionality
An example of the correlational method
Surveys large groups of people to get a picture of an entire population
Examines incidence, prevalence, and course of disorders
Examples – AIDS, trauma following disaster
Nature of experimental research
Manipulate independent variable
Observe effects on dependent variable
Attempt to determine causal relationships
Premium on internal validity
Group Experimental Designs
Involves manipulating a variable (i.e., introducing or withdrawing something in a controlled way)
Clinical trial: experiment designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a treatment
Example: Administering a drug
Control group: provides a comparison point
Often matched to demographics of experimental group
Placebo: some participants are given an inactive treatment (e.g., sugar pill), but participants don’t know which treatment they are getting
Double-blind: participants and assessors are unaware of what kind of treatment participants are getting
Placebo effect: something changes simply because the participant expects the change to occur (e.g., expecting to feel better when taking an inactive pill)
Nature of single subject design
Rigorous study of single cases
Manipulate timing and nature of experimental conditions
Frequent repeated measurement of outcomes is critical
Permits conclusions about changes over time relative to the introduction and withdrawal of certain variables
Types of single-subject design
Withdrawal designs
First establish a baseline, then introduce treatment
Then, stop treatment to see if behavior/symptoms return to the way they were before treatment
May present ethical concerns if an efficacious treatment is removed
Multiple baseline designs
Start treatment at different times in different conditions (e.g., in home vs. school settings) – see if changes occur in conjunction with introduction of treatment
Improves internal validity
Behavioral genetics
Interactions of genes, experience, and behavior
Phenotype vs. genotype
Genotype: genetic makeup
Phenotype: observable characteristics (e.g., eye color, degree of shyness)
Endophenotype: genetic mechanism that contributes to problems causing certain symptoms
Example: Group of genes responsible for impairing working memory in schizophrenia
Family Studies
Proband: The person who has the trait of interest (e.g. someone who has schizophrenia)
If there is a genetic influence, expect to see the trait more in first-degree relatives compared to second-degree
Familial aggregation: tendency of a disorder to run in families
Issue of shared environment: families usually live together, so similarities may be due to environmental factors as well as genetics
Adoption studies
One way to separate the effects of the environment
Sibling pairs separated after birth: Do they show similarities even if they were raised in different environments?
Are adopted children more similar to their birth parents (genetics) or adoptive parents (environment)?
Twin studies
Compare identical/monozygotic twins against fraternal/dizygotic twins
If a trait is genetic, expect to see greater concordance in identical twins (similar environment and same genetics) compared to fraternal twins (similar environment, different genetics)
Can be combined with adoption studies: If identical twins are both adopted separately and raised apart, shared outcomes are more attributable to genetics
Genetic linkage studies and association studies
Examine known genetic markers (certain gene whose location is known)
Compare these genetic markers against the trait being studied
If the genetic marker tends to co-occur with the trait, conclude that the trait is probably caused in part by genes that are in close proximity to the genetic marker (e.g. on the same chromosome)
Genetic linkage studies occur in groups of people who all have the trait of interest
Association studies occur in people with and without the trait of interest
Prevention research
Health promotion: increasing healthy behavior in entire population (even people not at risk for developing disorders)
Universal prevention: target specific risk factors but not specific people
Selective prevention: targets groups of people at risk
Indicated prevention: targets specific individuals who are showing early signs of a disorder
Time-based research strategies
Cross-sectional designs: take a cross section of the population at different age groups
Compare cohorts (age groups) on traits of interest
Longitudinal designs: study one group of people over time
Have to take into account specific experiences of the generation being studied (cross- generational effect)
Value of cross-cultural research
Overcoming ethnocentric views
Increases understanding of
Etiologies
Symptom presentations
Treatments
Difficulties in cross-cultural research
Definitions of abnormal behavior
Variance in presentation
Availability of valid assessment instruments may be limited
Components of a research program
Set of interrelated research questions
Draw on several methodologies in finding answers
Conducted in stages, often involving replication
Allows for more nuanced, complete picture of a phenomenon
Replication is critical
Protects against fluke results
Sometimes, needs of science (e.g., designing a good experiment) are at odds with needs of research participants (e.g., need for treatment)
Research ethics determine the degree to which each should be prioritized
Ethic determined by institutional review boards (IRBs) and the APA ethics code
Oversee the rights of human subjects participating in research
Maje sure research and data are handled responsibly
Ethical principals
Informed consent
Became more widely discussed after Nazis had forced people to participate in research in WWII
Competence: ability to provide consent
Voluntarism: lack of coercion
Full information: necessary information to make an informed decision
Comprehension: understanding about benefits and risks of participation
Starts with a hypothesis or “educated guess”
Not all hypotheses are testable
Hypotheses in science are formulated so that they are testable
Research Design: a method to test hypotheses
Independent variable: the variable that causes or influences behavior
Dependent variable: the behavior influenced by the independent variable
Internal validity vs. external validity
Internal validity: extent to which results of a study are due to the independent variable
External validity: extent to which results of a study are generalizable to the population it’s studying
Ways to increase internal validity by minimizing confounds
Use of control groups
Use of random assignment procedures
Use of analogue models
Statistical methods – branch of mathematics
Helps to protect against biases in evaluating data
Statistical vs. clinical significance
Statistical significance – asks are results due to chance?
Clinical significance – asks are results clinically meaningful?
Statistical significance does not imply clinical meaningfulness
Balancing statistical versus clinical significance
Evaluate effect size
Evaluate social validity
Case study method
Extensive observation and detailed description of a single client
Foundation of early historic developments in psychopathology
Limitations
Lacks scientific rigor and suitable controls
Internal validity is typically weak
Often entails numerous confounds
Correlation: assess the degree to which levels of certain variables are linked to levels of other variables
The nature of correlation
Statistical relation between two or more variables
No independent variable is manipulated
Range from –1.0 to 0 to +1.0
Negative vs. positive correlation
Necessary in situations where you can’t manipulate variables
Limitations
Does not imply causation
Problem of directionality
An example of the correlational method
Surveys large groups of people to get a picture of an entire population
Examines incidence, prevalence, and course of disorders
Examples – AIDS, trauma following disaster
Nature of experimental research
Manipulate independent variable
Observe effects on dependent variable
Attempt to determine causal relationships
Premium on internal validity
Group Experimental Designs
Involves manipulating a variable (i.e., introducing or withdrawing something in a controlled way)
Clinical trial: experiment designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a treatment
Example: Administering a drug
Control group: provides a comparison point
Often matched to demographics of experimental group
Placebo: some participants are given an inactive treatment (e.g., sugar pill), but participants don’t know which treatment they are getting
Double-blind: participants and assessors are unaware of what kind of treatment participants are getting
Placebo effect: something changes simply because the participant expects the change to occur (e.g., expecting to feel better when taking an inactive pill)
Nature of single subject design
Rigorous study of single cases
Manipulate timing and nature of experimental conditions
Frequent repeated measurement of outcomes is critical
Permits conclusions about changes over time relative to the introduction and withdrawal of certain variables
Types of single-subject design
Withdrawal designs
First establish a baseline, then introduce treatment
Then, stop treatment to see if behavior/symptoms return to the way they were before treatment
May present ethical concerns if an efficacious treatment is removed
Multiple baseline designs
Start treatment at different times in different conditions (e.g., in home vs. school settings) – see if changes occur in conjunction with introduction of treatment
Improves internal validity
Behavioral genetics
Interactions of genes, experience, and behavior
Phenotype vs. genotype
Genotype: genetic makeup
Phenotype: observable characteristics (e.g., eye color, degree of shyness)
Endophenotype: genetic mechanism that contributes to problems causing certain symptoms
Example: Group of genes responsible for impairing working memory in schizophrenia
Family Studies
Proband: The person who has the trait of interest (e.g. someone who has schizophrenia)
If there is a genetic influence, expect to see the trait more in first-degree relatives compared to second-degree
Familial aggregation: tendency of a disorder to run in families
Issue of shared environment: families usually live together, so similarities may be due to environmental factors as well as genetics
Adoption studies
One way to separate the effects of the environment
Sibling pairs separated after birth: Do they show similarities even if they were raised in different environments?
Are adopted children more similar to their birth parents (genetics) or adoptive parents (environment)?
Twin studies
Compare identical/monozygotic twins against fraternal/dizygotic twins
If a trait is genetic, expect to see greater concordance in identical twins (similar environment and same genetics) compared to fraternal twins (similar environment, different genetics)
Can be combined with adoption studies: If identical twins are both adopted separately and raised apart, shared outcomes are more attributable to genetics
Genetic linkage studies and association studies
Examine known genetic markers (certain gene whose location is known)
Compare these genetic markers against the trait being studied
If the genetic marker tends to co-occur with the trait, conclude that the trait is probably caused in part by genes that are in close proximity to the genetic marker (e.g. on the same chromosome)
Genetic linkage studies occur in groups of people who all have the trait of interest
Association studies occur in people with and without the trait of interest
Prevention research
Health promotion: increasing healthy behavior in entire population (even people not at risk for developing disorders)
Universal prevention: target specific risk factors but not specific people
Selective prevention: targets groups of people at risk
Indicated prevention: targets specific individuals who are showing early signs of a disorder
Time-based research strategies
Cross-sectional designs: take a cross section of the population at different age groups
Compare cohorts (age groups) on traits of interest
Longitudinal designs: study one group of people over time
Have to take into account specific experiences of the generation being studied (cross- generational effect)
Value of cross-cultural research
Overcoming ethnocentric views
Increases understanding of
Etiologies
Symptom presentations
Treatments
Difficulties in cross-cultural research
Definitions of abnormal behavior
Variance in presentation
Availability of valid assessment instruments may be limited
Components of a research program
Set of interrelated research questions
Draw on several methodologies in finding answers
Conducted in stages, often involving replication
Allows for more nuanced, complete picture of a phenomenon
Replication is critical
Protects against fluke results
Sometimes, needs of science (e.g., designing a good experiment) are at odds with needs of research participants (e.g., need for treatment)
Research ethics determine the degree to which each should be prioritized
Ethic determined by institutional review boards (IRBs) and the APA ethics code
Oversee the rights of human subjects participating in research
Maje sure research and data are handled responsibly
Ethical principals
Informed consent
Became more widely discussed after Nazis had forced people to participate in research in WWII
Competence: ability to provide consent
Voluntarism: lack of coercion
Full information: necessary information to make an informed decision
Comprehension: understanding about benefits and risks of participation