Abnormal Psychology: Research Methods
Basic Components of Research
- Starts with a hypothesis or “educated guess”
- Not all hypotheses are testable
- Hypotheses in science are formulated so that they are testable
- Research Design: a method to test hypotheses
- Independent variable: the variable that causes or influences behavior
- Dependent variable: the behavior influenced by the independent variable
Considerations in Research Design
- Internal validity vs. external validity
- Internal validity: extent to which results of a study are due to the independent variable
- External validity: extent to which results of a study are generalizable to the population it’s studying
- Ways to increase internal validity by minimizing confounds
- Use of control groups
- Use of random assignment procedures
- Use of analogue models
Statistical vs Clinical Significance
- Statistical methods – branch of mathematics
- Helps to protect against biases in evaluating data
- Statistical vs. clinical significance
- Statistical significance – asks are results due to chance?
- Clinical significance – asks are results clinically meaningful?
- Statistical significance does not imply clinical meaningfulness
- Balancing statistical versus clinical significance
- Evaluate effect size
- Evaluate social validity
Studying Individual Cases
- Case study method
- Extensive observation and detailed description of a single client
- Foundation of early historic developments in psychopathology
- Limitations
- Lacks scientific rigor and suitable controls
- Internal validity is typically weak
- Often entails numerous confounds
Research by Correlation
- Correlation: assess the degree to which levels of certain variables are linked to levels of other variables
- The nature of correlation
- Statistical relation between two or more variables
- No independent variable is manipulated
- Range from –1.0 to 0 to +1.0
- Negative vs. positive correlation
- Necessary in situations where you can’t manipulate variables
- Limitations
- Does not imply causation
- Problem of directionality
Epidemiological Research
- An example of the correlational method
- Surveys large groups of people to get a picture of an entire population
- Examines incidence, prevalence, and course of disorders
- Examples – AIDS, trauma following disaster
Research by Experiment
- Nature of experimental research
- Manipulate independent variable
- Observe effects on dependent variable
- Attempt to determine causal relationships
- Premium on internal validity
- Group Experimental Designs
- Involves manipulating a variable (i.e., introducing or withdrawing something in a controlled way)
- Clinical trial: experiment designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a treatment
- Example: Administering a drug
Control Groups in Clinical Trials
- Control group: provides a comparison point
- Often matched to demographics of experimental group
- Placebo: some participants are given an inactive treatment (e.g., sugar pill), but participants don’t know which treatment they are getting
- Double-blind: participants and assessors are unaware of what kind of treatment participants are getting
- Placebo effect: something changes simply because the participant expects the change to occur (e.g., expecting to feel better when taking an inactive pill)
Single-Case Experimental Designs
- Nature of single subject design
- Rigorous study of single cases
- Manipulate timing and nature of experimental conditions
- Frequent repeated measurement of outcomes is critical
- Permits conclusions about changes over time relative to the introduction and withdrawal of certain variables
- Types of single-subject design
- Withdrawal designs
- First establish a baseline, then introduce treatment
- Then, stop treatment to see if behavior/symptoms return to the way they were before treatment
- May present ethical concerns if an efficacious treatment is removed
- Multiple baseline designs
- Start treatment at different times in different conditions (e.g., in home vs. school settings) – see if changes occur in conjunction with introduction of treatment
- Improves internal validity
Studying Genetics
- Behavioral genetics
- Interactions of genes, experience, and behavior
- Phenotype vs. genotype
- Genotype: genetic makeup
- Phenotype: observable characteristics (e.g., eye color, degree of shyness)
- Endophenotype: genetic mechanism that contributes to problems causing certain symptoms
- Example: Group of genes responsible for impairing working memory in schizophrenia
- Family Studies
- Proband: The person who has the trait of interest (e.g. someone who has schizophrenia)
- If there is a genetic influence, expect to see the trait more in first-degree relatives compared to second-degree
- Familial aggregation: tendency of a disorder to run in families
- Issue of shared environment: families usually live together, so similarities may be due to environmental factors as well as genetics
- Adoption studies
- One way to separate the effects of the environment
- Sibling pairs separated after birth: Do they show similarities even if they were raised in different environments?
- Are adopted children more similar to their birth parents (genetics) or adoptive parents (environment)?
- Twin studies
- Compare identical/monozygotic twins against fraternal/dizygotic twins
- If a trait is genetic, expect to see greater concordance in identical twins (similar environment and same genetics) compared to fraternal twins (similar environment, different genetics)
- Can be combined with adoption studies: If identical twins are both adopted separately and raised apart, shared outcomes are more attributable to genetics
- Genetic linkage studies and association studies
- Examine known genetic markers (certain gene whose location is known)
- Compare these genetic markers against the trait being studied
- If the genetic marker tends to co-occur with the trait, conclude that the trait is probably caused in part by genes that are in close proximity to the genetic marker (e.g. on the same chromosome)
- Genetic linkage studies occur in groups of people who all have the trait of interest
- Association studies occur in people with and without the trait of interest
Studying Behavior Over Time
- Prevention research
- Health promotion: increasing healthy behavior in entire population (even people not at risk for developing disorders)
- Universal prevention: target specific risk factors but not specific people
- Selective prevention: targets groups of people at risk
- Indicated prevention: targets specific individuals who are showing early signs of a disorder
- Time-based research strategies
- Cross-sectional designs: take a cross section of the population at different age groups
- Compare cohorts (age groups) on traits of interest
- Longitudinal designs: study one group of people over time
- Have to take into account specific experiences of the generation being studied (cross- generational effect)
Studying Behavior Across Cultures
- Value of cross-cultural research
- Overcoming ethnocentric views
- Increases understanding of
- Etiologies
- Symptom presentations
- Treatments
- Difficulties in cross-cultural research
- Definitions of abnormal behavior
- Variance in presentation
- Availability of valid assessment instruments may be limited
Research Programs
- Components of a research program
- Set of interrelated research questions
- Draw on several methodologies in finding answers
- Conducted in stages, often involving replication
- Allows for more nuanced, complete picture of a phenomenon
- Replication is critical
- Protects against fluke results
Research Ethics
- Sometimes, needs of science (e.g., designing a good experiment) are at odds with needs of research participants (e.g., need for treatment)
- Research ethics determine the degree to which each should be prioritized
- Ethic determined by institutional review boards (IRBs) and the APA ethics code
- Oversee the rights of human subjects participating in research
- Maje sure research and data are handled responsibly
- Ethical principals
- Informed consent
- Became more widely discussed after Nazis had forced people to participate in research in WWII
- Competence: ability to provide consent
- Voluntarism: lack of coercion
- Full information: necessary information to make an informed decision
- Comprehension: understanding about benefits and risks of participation
\