Tension: Cultural appreciation is viewed as a valorized identity project by ethnic consumers while cultural appropriation poses societal implications, indicated by two types of consumer subjects: the ethnic consumer and the responsibilized consumer.
Study Focus: Analysis of international K-pop consumers illustrating how they navigate self-authorization, defined as reflexive self-reconfiguration concerning cultural consumption.
Types Identified: Four self-authorization strategies:
Reforming: Consumers critique and engage with issues like racism and cultural appropriation, positioning themselves as responsible custodians of culture.
Restraining: Consumers limit their engagement to less controversial cultural expressions to avoid social judgment, becoming cautious appreciators.
Recontextualizing: Consumers situate their cultural engagement within sociohistorical contexts to understand appropriative issues better.
Rationalizing: Consumers mitigate appropriative concerns by framing cultural exchange positively, positioning themselves as enlightened cosmopolitan participants.
Reflexivity Concept: Consumers reflect on their identities through the lens of cultural discourse which influences their protectionism and expansion of cultural knowledge.
Consumer Subjectivity: Understanding of how consumers position themselves in relation to others' cultures being consumed, enabling the blending of cultural appreciation and cultural appropriation discourses.
Orientation: Promotes a moral view as consuming cultural difference as a benign and enriching practice, often shown through various domains like international foods and music.
Market Dynamics: Cultural consumption has been reframed from conflict to a source of commodified difference, enhancing consumer identity through global market engagement.
Understanding: Articulated as problematic use of cultural elements by externally identifying groups that may ignore underlying historical tensions.
Market Implications: The increasing awareness of cultural appropriation challenges the normative practices of cultural consumption, arguing for deeper ethical considerations in marketing strategies.
Reforming: Activist custodians analyze anti-appropriation and seek systemic changes within K-pop consumption practices.
Restraining: Limiting engagement to avoid negative associations and moral conflicts, protection against cultural misrepresentation.
Recontextualizing: Consumers educate themselves about the cultures involved, fostering a respectful approach to cultural engagement in the K-pop arena.
Rationalizing: Dismissing appropriation concerns by framing cultural exchanges as globally acceptable, downplaying potential negative impacts.
Data Sources: Combination of in-depth interviews, netnographic observations within K-pop fandoms, and analysis of social media discourse on cultural appropriation concerns in K-pop.
Participants: 38 international K-pop fans engaged in qualitative interviews aimed at exploring individual engagement with cultural difference.
Consumer Level: Increased awareness around cultural appropriation encourages more informed consumer choices while navigating societal pressures and cultural sensitivities.
Industry Level: Brands must account for cultural representation dynamics as they craft identities and marketing narratives, lest they provoke backlash from aware consumers.
Societal Level: The evolving discourse encourages a more nuanced understanding of cultural interactions, but risks creating divisions among consumer bases based on cultural sensitivity perceptions and resulting behaviors.
The study sheds light on complexities surrounding cultural consumption in the global marketplace, particularly reflecting on identity construction amid current social dynamics concerning cultural appreciation and appropriation in contexts like K-pop.