Instructor: Dr. Valerie Todd
Contact: vat8@aber.ac.uk
Key Points:
Choosing a topic
Identifying barriers
Example topics
Methodological considerations
Next steps
Considerations:
Project must hold your attention.
Must be attainable within the timescale.
Needs to be suitable for ethical approval.
Realistic access to participants is essential.
Challenges in Research:
Working within the NHS.
Conducting research in prisons.
Recruiting participants with existing mental health issues.
Finding participants in recovery (e.g., from gambling addiction).
Addressing sensitive subjects (e.g., suicide).
Working with vulnerable groups (e.g., children).
Doll Test (Clarke, 1940s):
Examined impact of racism on self-esteem in Black children aged 3-7 in America.
Adapted to Muslim children in the UK.
The Bouba/Kiki Effect (Kohler, 1929):
Study related shape to sound.
Applied to food texture and sound.
Examining mass media's influence on attitudes toward asylum seekers in the UK (e.g., media portrayal of young boy washed ashore).
Effects of media on perceptions of minority groups.
The impact of Instagram on self-esteem in adolescent girls and middle-aged men.
Qualified Dietician:
Impact of dietary regimes on disordered eating behaviors (e.g., Slimming World Syns).
Working with adolescents with High Functioning Autism (HFA) in specialized colleges regarding interpersonal relationships.
Long-term experience in wild water swimming and its impact on wellbeing.
Experiment assessing how epilepsy affects short-term memory.
Parental perspectives on raising a child with autism.
The influence of sexual experiences on self-esteem in obese women.
Experiences surrounding diabetes diagnosis.
After selecting a broad topic, decide on the methodology to address research questions.
Methodology should align with the desired outcomes, not personal comfort levels.
Correct methodology is essential for effectively answering research questions.
Study design influences:
Participant recruitment strategies.
Timeline for study setup, execution, and data analysis.
The rigor and quality of the project.
Early considerations related to methodology affect supervisor allocations.
Changing supervisors only possible in extreme cases; post-allocation methodology changes may lead to a mismatch in supervisor expertise.
Questions to Consider:
Do you have a testable hypothesis?
Are you interested in cause-and-effect relationships?
Do you want to investigate trends, patterns, or correlations?
Is generalizability of information important to you?
Do you prefer exploring and understanding phenomena in-depth?
Are you more focused on individual experiences and interpretations?
Supervision Requirements:
Specific staff are necessary for supervising lab studies (e.g., EEG, Bio-pac, Eye-tracker).
Limited capacity for supervising such studies.
Consult relevant staff early if considering laboratory work.
Compulsory training prior to summer and early ethics applications are necessary.
Responsibilities upon Using Equipment:
Responsibility to organize needed materials and programs lies with the researcher.
Attend compulsory training if laboratory equipment is involved.
Supervisor serves as the primary support resource.
Examples:
Alex T: Physiological responses using attention tasks; Experimental design (bio-pac, E-Prime).
Nigel: Influence of auditory presentation on attention; Experimental design (E-Prime).
Victoria: Role of visual advertising stimuli; Experimental design (eye-tracker).
Antonia: Attention creation in conversation; Naturally occurring data analysis (focus groups, IPA).
Examples:
Hanna: Role of language acquisition; Quasi-experimental design (E-prime).
Victoria: Influence of language structure on cognitive ability; Experimental design (bio-pac, eye-tracker with E-Prime).
Rachel: Experience of healthcare provision in first or second languages; Individual interviews (thematic analysis/IPA).
Saffron: Language status's impact on employability; Questionnaire design.
Val: Health barriers in non-native English speakers; Population survey.
Examples:
Martine: Wellbeing discussions in committed relationships; Individual interviews (discourse analysis).
Gil: Humor's role in wellbeing; Experimental design (questionnaire-based).
Alison: Gender's role in social wellbeing construction; Focus groups (thematic analysis).
Trefor: Efficacy of complementary therapies on wellbeing; Focus groups (thematic analysis).
Val: Social support's impact on refugee womenâs wellbeing; Mixed-methods intervention study.
Examples:
Heather: Academic performance understanding among underachieving students; Focus groups (adolescents).
Val: Self-efficacy's influence on academic success; Longitudinal survey (HE students).
Simon: Intervention strategies on sport performance; Intervention design (questionnaires).
Catherine: Developmental tasks' predictability for wellbeing in children; Experimental design (questionnaires).
Gareth H: Influence of images on male athletic perceptions; Experimental design (eye-tracker and questionnaires).
Determine your topic area and appropriate broad methodological approaches.
Organize meetings with relevant staff for project development discussions.
Adapt your approaches and designs based on staff feedback.
Consider your preferences for quantitative vs. qualitative methodologies; changes after supervisor allocation are typically not possible.
Open invitation for inquiries regarding the process.