Explain various sources of states' power potential.
Understand models that help explain how states make foreign policy decisions.
Explain various tools of statecraft preferred by realists, liberals, and constructivists.
Analyze major contemporary challenges to the state.
States are critical actors in international relations, engaging in warfare, cooperation, treaty-making, and economic policymaking.
Future chapters will explore:
Chapter 6: War
Chapter 7: Cooperation and international law
Chapter 8: Economic relations
Chapter 9: International organizations
Ongoing tensions between the U.S. and China, escalating since 2018 with:
Introduction of tariffs by the U.S.
COVID-19 accusations from both countries.
Economic conflict has extended to currency manipulation and trade negotiations.
Strategic disagreements have also developed.
Essential questions arise about the future of cooperation between these two powers.
Glossary of key terms:
State: An organized political unit recognized by other states.
Power: The ability to influence others and control outcomes.
Power potential: The capacity of a state based on its resources.
State power is crucial for influencing international relations, consisting of several sources:
Natural Sources: Geographic size, resources, population.
Tangible Sources: Economic development, military strength, industrial capacity.
Intangible Sources: Public support, government quality, leadership.
Geographic size and position can enhance power potential.
Natural resources contribute significantly to power; example: oil-rich nations wield substantial influence despite small size.
Population size influences a state's ability to produce goods and services—large, healthy populations yield greater economic power.
Industrial development and military capabilities modify how geographic advantages play out.
Advanced economies can mitigate geographic disadvantages (e.g., air travel).
Public morale and organizational cohesion are vital; weak public support can diminish state power, as seen in conflicts like Vietnam.
Hard Power: Coercive techniques (military, economic sanctions) used to influence other states.
E.g., U.S. sanctions against Iran, military actions in conflicts.
Soft Power: Persuasive techniques based on legitimacy, values, and principles.
E.g., China's "mask diplomacy" during COVID-19.
Smart Power: Combination of both hard and soft power strategies.
Diplomacy: Nonviolent dialogue and negotiations between states.
Public Diplomacy: Targeting foreign public opinions to enhance a state's image.
Track Two Diplomacy: Informal discussions by non-governmental actors aiming for conflict resolution.
Economic Statecraft: Use of incentives (positive engagement) or punitive measures (sanctions).
Use of Force: Military actions to compel or deter actions from other states.
A state must be perceived as having both the ability and the will to execute its policies for them to be effective.
Rational Model: Envisions states as unitary actors weighing options based on potential outcomes; often applied in crises.
Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Models: Recognize the influence of varied governmental organizations and internal negotiations on decision-making.
Pluralist Model: Highlights the role societal interests and public opinion play in shaping foreign policy.
Constructivist Approach: Focuses on norms and cultural factors driving decisions; emphasizes how states’ strategic cultures shape behavior.
Increasing impact of transnational movements, including extremist ideologies and crime, undermining state control.
Rise of ethnonational movements demanding sovereignty and autonomy (e.g., Kashmir, Uighurs).
Challenges from fragile states exhibit inability to maintain order and provide services, leading to crises.
Examples include Yemen and Somalia, with humanitarian crises exacerbated by conflict.
Power: The ability to influence or control outcomes significantly in international relations.
Statecraft: The strategies employed by states to exert power, including diplomacy, economic measures, and force.
Decision-making models illustrate varied influences on how states create their foreign policies.