CFC Concepts - Key Terms from the Video Notes

CFC Concept

• CFC stands for Controlled Foreign Company. CFC rules are prevalent in around 30 countries.
• A CFC is typically a foreign company that:
  • Is directly or indirectly controlled by resident taxpayers; ext{control via ownership or voting power is common}
  • Earns substantial passive income; and
  • Is subject to substantially lower taxation than in the resident state.
• Nature of control:
  • Generally, >50 ext{\%} ownership; voting power (e.g., Golden Share).
• Passive income arising in overseas jurisdictions is attributed to resident shareholders.
• Passive income means \text{interest, rent, dividends, royalties, and capital gains}.
• Lower taxation is assessed via the “Effective Tax Rate” (ETR) versus nominal tax rate.
• Key distinction: \text{ETR} vs \text{Nominal Tax Rate}.

International CFC Scenario

• CFC regulations are present in many advanced economies, typically addressing:
  • Definitions of control thresholds to classify a foreign entity as a CFC (or “Controlled Corporation”).
  • Exemption/activity thresholds to exclude entities (e.g., business criteria, substance criteria, management and control criteria).
  • Tax rate thresholds or mechanisms to enable current taxation of undistributed profits.
  • Tax credit mechanisms for taxes paid or underlying tax credits/participation exemptions to mitigate double taxation.

OECD Approaches to CFC Regulation

• Two broad approaches observed:
  1) Transactional approach – Location of the CFC is disregarded; rules tax specific incomes, generally passive (often called tainted income).
  2) Entity/jurisdictional approach – Low-tax jurisdictions are identified and all income of the CFC in such jurisdictions is taxed irrespective of source (an "all or nothing" effect).
• Fairly advanced CFC regimes exist in the US, UK, Australia, Japan, and France.

CFC History (Historical Context)

• USA: Introduced in 1962 – first country to adopt CFC rules.
• UK: Introduced in 1984 to prevent UK residents from reducing UK tax liabilities by diverting profits to foreign controlled low-tax jurisdictions.
• South Africa: Introduced in 1997 under Section 9D of the Income Tax Act to protect the taxation base; initially taxed passive income, later extended to active income.

Overview: Japanese CFC Rules (J-CFC)

• Japan combines two ownership-based tests to determine if a foreign entity is a CFC:
  1) Foreign-Related Corporation (FRC) test: a CFC if 50\% of the shares are owned by Japanese shareholders.
  2) Japanese shareholder test: a shareholder is a company or associated person holding \ge 10\% of the outstanding shares of the CFC.

Example 1: J-CORP-A (Japan) and CORP B (Italy)

• Situation: Mister San (Japan) and J-CORP-A (Japan) each directly own 26\% of CORP B (Italy).
• Combined ownership: 26\% + 26\% = 52\%, so CORP B is a CFC under Japanese rules.
• Each Japanese shareholder holds 26\% of CORP B (Italian entity), satisfying the 10% shareholder threshold.

How to Apply J-CFC Rules (Core Rule)

• General/basic rule: if a foreign subsidiary is in a country with no income tax or if the foreign subsidiary’s ETR is less than 30% (
  \text{ETR} < 0.30), then the CFC income of that subsidiary is taxed in Japan.
• Additional considerations apply (e.g., EAT, substance, and other tests) before final taxation.

Flow Chart: Japanese CFC Rules (High-Level View)

• Key decision points (as depicted in the flow chart slide):
  • Foreign related company? (Japanese investors over 50%)
  • EAT outcomes: whether an Economic Activity Test is satisfied.
  • Classification into categories such as Paper Company, Cash Box, or Blacklist.
  • Determination of inclusion level: Full inclusion vs Partial inclusion (see below).
  • Blacklist considerations: Some entities may be auto-included due to certain risk factors (e.g., non-cooperative jurisdictions).
• Notes from slide: various thresholds (e.g., 20–30% ranges) influence inclusion outcomes, combined with EAT results and blacklist status.

Effective Tax Rate (ETR)

• ETR is determined at the end of the foreign subsidiary’s fiscal year.
• Fiscal year definition: period defined by the laws and governing documents under which the company’s profits are computed.
• Formula:
  \text{ETR} = \frac{\text{Total corporate income tax}}{\text{Profit before tax}}
• ETR is used to decide CFC inclusion and taxation in Japan.

Example 2: Nominal Tax Rate vs. Effective Tax Rate (Italy Case)

• Scenario: Italian nominal tax rate = IRES + IRAP = 24\% + 3.9\% = 27.9\%.
• Profit before tax: €10{,}000{,}000.
• Case A (base nominal): Tax = €2{,}790{,}000; Nominal tax rate = 27.9\%.
• Case B (with permanent/temporary differences – see next page for detailed numbers): Resulting ETR is higher due to differences.

Example 2: Nominal Tax Rate vs. Effective Tax Rate (Detailed Calculation)

• Case with permanent and temporary differences:
  • Permanent differences total: €1{,}000{,}000 (e.g., non-deductible expenses).
  • Temporary differences: €2{,}000{,}000 (taxable/tax-deductible timing differences).
  • Taxable income: €13{,}000{,}000.
  • Nominal tax rate: 27.9\%.
  • TAX (Total corporate income tax): €3{,}627{,}000.
  • ETR: \frac{3{,}627{,}000}{10{,}000{,}000} = 0.363\;\;(36.3\%)

Example 2: Alternative with ACE Incentives

• Adjusted differences (including ACE incentives):
  • Permanent differences: €-1{,}300{,}000
  • Temporary differences: €1{,}800{,}000
  • Taxable income: €10{,}500{,}000
  • Nominal tax rate: 27.9\%
  • TOTAL CORPORATE INCOME TAX: €2{,}929{,}500
  • ETR: \frac{2{,}929{,}500}{10{,}000{,}000}\approx 0.293\;(29.3\%)

Paper Companies, Cash Box, and Blacklist (Definitions)

• Paper Company:
  • A business entity with little or no substance (e.g., lack of physical assets or employees) or without its own administration/management; head office location used for tax purposes.
• Cash Box Company:
  • Primarily passive income; assets are low relative to securities, loans, and receivables.
• Blacklist Company:
  • Resident in a jurisdiction designated as non-cooperative for exchange of tax information (e.g., OECD-listed “tax havens”).
  • Such companies are included in the J-CFC rules if they do not meet a minimum ETR of 30\%.

Blacklist Example

• Trinidad and Tobago was flagged as a non-cooperative jurisdiction in 2017 (OECD report) and designated as a J-CFC country by Japan’s Ministry of Finance for exchange of tax information purposes.

Economic Activity Test (EAT)

• EAT is used to confirm whether a foreign affiliate has the necessary economic activity attributes to receive active income.
• Purpose: limit J-CFC applicability to entities with substance and independent business activity, demonstrating sufficient economic rationality to conduct business locally.
• A company will not be subject to J-CFC for the fiscal year that it satisfies all four specified tests (as per slide):
  • Substance Test
  • Management & Control Test
  • Economic Activity Test (EAT)
  • An additional criterion related to independent business activity (as per the slide interpretation)

Example 3: Economic Activity Test (EAT) — Paper Company Exclusion

• For a Paper Company, two tests are run:
  • If the entity does not satisfy both the Substance Test and the Management & Control Test, it is categorized as a Paper Company and excluded from J-CFC inclusion for that year.

Example 4: Economic Activity Test (EAT) — Cash Box Exclusion

• For a Cash Box Company, two steps apply (as per slide):
  • The EAT evaluates whether the entity has sufficient economic activity and substance to merit active income treatment.
  • If the tests indicate insufficient substance, the entity may be treated as Cash Box rather than having full active income inclusion; see slide for the two-step process.

Passive Income Categories ( illustrative list )

• Dividend income
• Interest income
• Lease of securities
• Capital gains
• Gains/losses on derivative transactions
• Gains/losses from foreign currency exchange
• Income from financial assets other than the above
• Lease income on fixed assets
• Lease income on intangible assets
• Gains/losses from the sale of intangible assets
• Cbonds (cash/bond income)

Full vs Partial Inclusion (Income in J-CFC taxation)

• Full Inclusion: All income of the foreign company is included in the Japanese tax calculation.
• Partial Inclusion: Only Passive Income is included in the Japanese tax calculation.
• In both scenarios, the foreign company becomes taxable in Japan, but it may be possible to apply foreign tax credits and/or exclude certain dividends to avoid double taxation.
• Compliance implications:
  • All relevant information must be submitted in the tax filing process.
  • The Japanese taxpayer must store documentation proving that foreign companies satisfy the Economic Activity Test and other substance criteria.

Practical Takeaways and Implications

• J-CFC rules emphasize substance and economic activity to distinguish between active and passive income of foreign affiliates.
• ETR is a critical metric in choosing whether to tax CFC income in Japan and whether to elect full or partial inclusion.
• ACE incentives can materially affect ETR and taxable income; careful planning can reduce effective tax leakage.
• The treatment of “paper” and “cash box” entities demonstrates how substance criteria affect tax outcomes.
• The handling of Blacklist jurisdictions reinforces the importance of corporate residence and information exchange standards for CFC purposes.
• Compliance requires meticulous documentation, including ownership structures, income classifications, and evidence of economic activity.

Quick References (Key Formulas and Points)

• Nominal tax rate (Italy example):\text{Nominal tax rate} = IRES + IRAP = 24\% + 3.9\% = 27.9\%.
• ETR calculation:\text{ETR} = \frac{\text{Total corporate income tax}}{\text{Profit before tax}}.
• Example ETR (No ACE):\text{ETR} = \frac{€3{,}627{,}000}{€10{,}000{,}000} = 0.363\;(36.3\%).
• Example ETR (with ACE):\text{ETR} = \frac{€2{,}929{,}500}{€10{,}000{,}000} = 0.293\;(29.3\%).
• For J-CFC, if the foreign subsidiary’s ETR is < 0.30\text{ (30\%)} or if taxation is effectively zero, CFC income is taxed in Japan (subject to other conditions).

THANK YOU