Chapter 1-7: Sexual Selection - Key Concepts Flashcards
Recap & Warm-Up Activities
Brief quiz on sibling rivalry (obligate vs. facultative cainism)
Older chick always kills the younger → obligate siblicide
Both chicks survive only in food-rich years → facultative
Nazca booby = obligate; Blue-footed booby = facultative
Quick brood-parasitism quiz (cuckoo vs. host)
Cuckoo lays mimetic eggs & removes a host egg immediately after laying
Host may abandon nest if cuckoo seen; relies on visual & auditory “passwords” to reject foreign chicks
Introduction to Sexual Selection (2-Lecture Block)
Central evolutionary question: Why are males usually colorful, weaponized, or perform elaborate displays while females are comparatively drab and choosy?
Today’s focus: evolutionary origins of sex differences in reproductive behaviour; tomorrow → sex-role reversal, mating systems, sexual conflict
Clarifying Key Terms
Sex = biological category (chromosomes, gametes, genitalia)
Not always binary; e.g.
Intersex conditions in humans
Simultaneous hermaphrodites (earthworms, many reef fish)
Gender = human social construct (internal identity); cannot be assigned to animals
Sexuality = patterns of sexual attraction & mating context, in both animals and humans
Writing tip: When describing animals’ reproductive categories, use “sex,” not “gender.”
Foundational Concepts Driving Sex Differences
Anisogamy ("unequal gametes")
Females: few, large, energetically expensive, often non-motile eggs
Males: numerous, tiny, energetically cheap, motile sperm
Illustrative numbers
Coho salmon ♂ lifetime sperm ≈ 100\,000\,000\,000 vs. ♀ eggs ≈ 3\,500
Superb fairy-wren ♂ testes store ≈ 8\,000\,000\,000 sperm at once
Single human ejaculate ≈ 350\,000\,000 sperm; ovaries hold only a few \times 10^2 egg precursors
Consequences of Anisogamy
Eggs = limiting resource → females typically the choosy sex
Males compete for access to rare, valuable eggs
Internal fertilization amplifies choosiness (females control fertilisation, invest heavily in post-zygotic care)
Bateman’s Principle (1940s fruit-fly experiments)
Male fitness (offspring #) rises roughly linearly with mating frequency
\text{Fitness}{♂} \propto N{\text{matings}}Female fitness plateaus after the first successful mating
One mating can theoretically fertilise all eggs for lifetime
Predicts: ♂ maximise quantity of mates; ♀ maximise quality of mates
Two Mechanisms of Sexual Selection
1. Intrasexual Selection ("within-sex" competition)
Usually ♂–♂ but can be ♀–♀
Favours evolution of weapons
Horns, antlers, tusks, enlarged mandibles, spines, etc.
Comparative Study: Bovid Horns
Data from 91 species
Variable of interest: mean group (harem) size vs. mean horn length
Pattern for males
Positive correlation: larger harems → longer horns
E.g. African buffalo: harem ≈ 50 ♀, long horns
Red-flanked duiker: harem ≈ 1 ♀, tiny horns
Females: horn length unrelated to group size (natural-selection function = anti-predator defence)
Alternative Mating Tactics (Condition-Dependent, NOT genetic)
Occur when a few dominant males monopolise fertilisations, leaving subordinates with “making the best of a bad job.”
Traits flexible; shift with body size, age, social context; unequal average fitness
Example: New Zealand Giraffe Weevil (Pepeke Nīkau)
Extreme body-size range: 12–90\,\text{mm} (both sexes)
♂ rostrum = weapon; length scales steeply with body size
Large ♂ fight (head-to-head grappling; goal: flip rival off tree)
Small ♂ adopt sneak tactic
Slip between guarding male & ♀, achieve copulation unnoticed
Tactic reversible with growth; condition-dependent
Alternative Mating Strategies (Genetically Fixed Polymorphisms)
Discrete morphs; equal average fitness via negative frequency-dependent selection
Classic rock–paper–scissors dynamics
Example: Side-blotched Lizards (Uta stansburiana)
Three genetically encoded throat-colour morphs
Orange ♂ (“rock”): ultra-dominant, large territories, many ♀
Blue ♂ (“paper”): monogamous, small territory, guard intensely
Yellow ♂ (“scissors”): sneaker, female mimic, no territory
Six-year population cycles: when one morph becomes common, the morph that beats it increases, etc.
Key distinction: morph = lifelong; strategy ≠ condition-dependent
2. Intersexual Selection (Mate Choice)
Often ♀ choosing ♂ ornaments/displays, but roles can reverse
Why Be Choosy? Benefit Categories
Direct Benefits to female
Nuptial gifts (scorpion flies: prey item consumed during mating)
Enhanced parental care (♂ helps rear young)
Sexual cannibalism / male self-sacrifice
Red-backed spiders: ♂ somersaults into ♀ jaws after plugging genital tract → ♀ fertilises higher % of eggs, ♂ paternity assured
Indirect (Genetic) Benefits to offspring
a. Good-Genes Model
Ornament indicates overall viability or disease resistance
Example: Pronghorn antelope
♀ assess males’ endurance displays
Offspring of preferred ♂ grow faster & survive predation better (survival curve: attractive-male fawns live longer across first 50 days)
b. Sexy-Sons / Fisherian Runaway
Trait is heritable & attractive per se, not necessarily linked to viability
Choosing extreme ornament → sons inherit trait + preference remains in population → daughters prefer that trait → positive feedback loop
Hypothetical illustration with stalk-eyed flies
Slightly longer eye-stalk ♂ gets more mates → produces equally viable but more attractive sons → grandmother’s inclusive fitness rises via extra grand-offspring
Tactics vs. Strategies: Quick Checklist
Feature | Alt. Mating Tactic | Alt. Mating Strategy |
|---|---|---|
Genetic basis | No (condition-dependent) | Yes (polymorphism) |
Flexibility | Switchable within lifetime | Fixed for life |
Fitness Equality | Usually lower than dominant tactic | Equal on average via freq-dependent selection |
Examples | Sneak giraffe-weevil; satellite toad | Side-blotched lizard throat morphs |
Key Takeaways
Sexual selection = special case of natural selection acting on traits that improve mating & fertilisation success, not survival.
Root cause of typical sex differences = anisogamy → Bateman’s Principle
Intrasexual competition drives evolution of weapons; intersexual choice drives ornaments & displays.
Extreme male-male competition can spawn alternative mating tactics; genetic morph systems create alternative mating strategies with cyclical dynamics.
Female choice persists because it provides
Direct material gains (food, care, protection)
Indirect genetic gains (Good Genes) or increased mating success of sons (Sexy Sons).
Connections & Real-World Relevance
Conservation biology: Understanding sexual selection helps predict which traits might be at risk if population densities drop (e.g., lekking birds of paradise).
Behavioural ecology methodology: Comparative datasets (bovid study) vs. field manipulations (pronghorn, stalk-eyed fly selection experiments).
Ethical/philosophical note: Avoid conflating human gender constructs with animal reproductive biology; appreciate diversity beyond binary frameworks.
Suggested Reading
Rubinstein, D. & Alcock, J. Animal Behavior (11th or 12th ed.)
Chapters on Sexual Selection & Parental Investment
What’s Next?
Lecture 2: sex-role reversal, mating systems (monogamy, polygyny, polyandry, promiscuity), and sexual conflict
Lab session tomorrow: refine research questions; assistance from Julie & demonstrators