Political economy is a lens for critiquing media content, such as entertainment and journalism.
Analyzes how media is produced, distributed, and consumed by audiences (McChesney).
It examines the power relationships between politics, mediation, and economics (Jin).
Relevant fields include journalism, broadcasting, advertising, and information technology.
Mass media content is created by powerful decision-making institutions within a capitalist framework.
Understanding practices, business models, norms, and power dynamics is crucial for comprehending how media represents reality.
Media images’ human construction highlights the business aspect of media-making.
Media and communication systems are shaped by ownership, market structures, technologies, labor practices, and government policies.
Political economy connects media systems to economic and political systems, linking social power exertion in society (McChesney).
Jefferson and Madison identified class inequality and militarism as threats to democracy.
A free press must address these threats by empowering the underprivileged and monitoring militarism (McChesney).
Does media content promote democracy and plurality, or does it support the status quo?
Are media sources a reflection of justice and equity, or do they serve privileged interests?
How can audiences drive understanding, critique, and change?
Corporate consolidation results in reduced content diversity.
The necessity for trained media personnel remains high despite cutbacks.
Digital surveillance raises issues concerning power concentration with tech companies.
Hegemonic values are reproduced within social structures, affecting cultural norms.
Hegemony refers to the dominance one social group holds over others (Lull, p. 41).
It embodies both power dynamics and methods for maintaining that power.
Ideologically, hegemony reflects societal beliefs (e.g., stereotypes about gender roles).
Hegemony can change over time—it's not a fixed concept.
It falters when dominant ideology faces strong social resistance (Lull, p. 43).
Explore formerly hegemonic ideas or values that have evolved over time.
Mass media act as instruments for elites to preserve their status and propagate their ideologies (Gramsci).
Media ownership correlates directly to the shaping of content and values favorable to powerful groups.
Mass media is viewed as a mechanism by which elites reinforce their power.
The propaganda model emphasizes how media upholds the interests of the powerful (Herman and Chomsky).
Powerful structures influence media representation, limiting diverse perspectives.
Information from marginalized groups faces credibility challenges—ideological biases impact representation (Herman and Chomsky).
Media Ownership: Concentration of media ownership restricts diverse narratives.
Advertising: Financial pressures influence content and framing.
The Media Elite: Certain individuals or groups control the narrative.
Flak/PR: Negative responses to media criticism by powerful interests.
Common Enemy: Unifying the public against a perceived threat justifies media narratives.
Explores how structural and economic factors shape media content despite claims of independence.
An influential examination of how media serves elite interests and maintains societal hegemony.
Recap and further investigations will continue in the following week.