OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder)
Obsession vs compulsion. Reccuring, unwanted thoughts that cause anxiety VS repetitive behavior people do to relieve that anxiety
Common fear: contamination, forgetting something, obsession with number, order and arrangement, unwanted violence thoughts
Diagnosed when occur 1 hour+ a day and negative impact on life
Some patient are aware of their problem (high insight), some has low insight and believe their actions are normal or else bad things will happen (wash hands every minute)\
Mini study: A boy feel something sticky on his skin, afraid to touch honey. He take showers multiple times a day and can’t go to school
To classify different OCD symptoms, separate OCD from other disorder and normal people
How to collect data?
Self-report question, 30 true false. 21+ is cut off score
What does it measure?
Statement about daily struggles
“I often check if the door is locked”. True/false
Test-retest
Only true false, no qualitative data. Might lack situation that ppt face in real life\
Cultural differences: Developed using British ppt
Assess severity of OCD
How data is collected?
Semi-structured interview, Scale 0-4 on severity of symptoms last week
What does it measure?
5 items about obsession and 5 about compulsion
Inter-rater reliability. 2 doctors assess the same patient give same accurate result
Good test-retest
Nomothetic (rating scale) + idiographic (interview)
Limited severity range
Cultural bias: Developed in Western countries
% parent, sibling, twin
Polygenic
Serotonin
Dopamine
Synapse
36% at least 1 parent with OCD
22% have sibling with OCD
87% MZ, 47% DZ
(OCD the most inheritable disorder. Such difference between MZ and DZ suggest that OCD is due to nature)
230 genes linked to OCD
5-HHT and serotonin (imbalance)
OCD linked to genes related to serotonin receptors & transporter molecule (MAO-A)
Mutation in 5-HTT gene make patient more vulnerable to OCD
DRD4, COMT and dopamine (imbalance)
DRD4: gene codes for D4 dopamine receptor. Dopamine imbalance cause OCD
COMT gene (enzyme breaks down dopamine), low level cause OCD
Polymorphism of COMT as well
SLITRK5 and BDNF
SLITRK5: synapse development and grow
Associated with protein BDNF: maintain connectivity between brain cell
Lack SLITRK5 and BDNF cause OCD
Biological determinism. Scientists remove SLITRK5 gene from mice, and they show compulsive behavior.
Lack nurture view. OCD symptoms differ to society culture. Brazil OCD mostly related to violence, but Singapore OCD is not so.
Low serotonin, serotonin is used in brain communication, disrupt communication cause OCD
Problems with dopamine receptor & transmitter
Problems with production of BDNF
High levels of Oxytocin
Caused by upregulation, OCD have too much DNA methylation that decrease OXTR gene (oxytocin producer). Oxytocin irregularities may cause OCD
Understanding biochemical helped make drugs
Holistic, DNA can be changed with impact from environment.
Too reductionist. Didn’t consider environment factor. Negative reinforcement make patient believe their repetitive behavior is necessary to relive tension
We have lots of thoughts a day. We normally ignore random thoughts. But OCD doesn’t ignore them, thought there are meaning behind those random thoughts.
If patient try to suppress those thoughts, they will come back even worse cause now that they pay attention to it instead of forgetting it
Thought-action fusion (believe thinking about a behavior is as bad as actually doing it, like imagine killing parent and blame yourself for thinking about it).
Thought-event fusion (think about a event will make it come true)
Compulsive behavior developed to reduce anxiety, negative reinforcement + avoidance = OCD feel that compulsive behavior is needed to avoid stress
When Id’s desires are not satisfied, they become obsessive thoughts
Unresolved conflict with parents during anal stage. Child become anally retentive and fixated at that stage. Excessive cleaning to resolve childhood trauma.
Situational explanation. Difficult childhood trauma lead to OCD
Only consider nuture, lack nature view. (Thobois et al) A man did surgery & damanged brain worry circuit, develop OCD right after surgery
Individual + situational. OCD is different between people (A fear of contaminating other, B fear of being contaminated). Situational factors worsen stress
Stop serotonin transporter (SERT) + noradrenaline transporter (NET) from being reabsorbed into presynaptic cell membranes
More SERT + NET around to bind with receptors
To increase serotonin and noradrenaline level
OCD caused by communication problem in brain, nerve communicate through serotonin
SSRI stop reuptake of serotonin by binding with SERT and stop serotonin from being transported
Increase serotonin to bind with 5HT receptors on postsynaptic cell
Use with risperidone to increase effectiveness
SSRIs side effects: nausea, vomiting, sleep problem
Too reductionist: 60% report no improvement, situation factor like relationship between patient and doctor affect drug effectiveness
A type of CBT
Exposure: expose patient to anxiety-provoking situation
Response prevention: stop patient from doing compulsive behavior when facing those situations
Patient identify obsession thoughts +environmental trigger that cause compulsive action
Put into SUDS rating, triggering situation arranged into hierarchy
Expose patient to situation until they habituate the stimulus (reduced arousal level)
Therapist teach patient that they are still safe without their compulsive behavior (not washing hands when touching door knob)
Don’t use relaxation technique (keep it realistic)
Alternative for drugs, no side effect
High generalizability, work for multiple OCDs
Difficult for inexperience therapist to deliver
New compulsion can occur unless ERP treat core underlying fear => need patient being honest about trigger stimuli
Mini study:
Jason has OCD
Ten 50 minute sessions of ERP over 16 weeks
Exposure – getting Jason to touch objects like door handle
Response prevention – reducing anxiety and need for behavior by using coping statements
After therapy score on Y-BOCS dropped from 18 to 3
Non-inferiority trial: test whether a new treatment is not worse than an existing one
Compare face to face + telephone CBT for OCD
72 (age range 16-65, match age, gender, income) OCD from UK, ppt used medicine are removed. Opportunity
Split into 2 groups randomly, face to face or telephone
Patient complete Y-BOCS, BDI and client satisfaction questionnaire twice (establish baseline twice, to replace control group), the psychologist assessed this did not know which condition ppt is in
Face to face group: 10 one hour weekly sessions of ERP
Telephone group: 8 30 minute weekly telephone sessions of ERP + 2 face to face meetings (first and last session of treatment)
Do the same questionnaire later => No differences in improvement and client satisfaction after 6 months
Telephone is as effective as face-to-face even the time is shorter
Used both Y-BOCS + BDI (good test retest and check for reliability). patient who used drugs were also removed to ensure only CBT affect symptoms
The score between 2 baseline test did not change much, suggesting that symptoms do not improve without ERP (compensate for lack of control group)
Random ppt allocation to 2 groups, avoid ppt variables. Gender, age, income are similar across groups
Psychologist blind
Good size sample and age range
13% revealed to therapist which group they are in, therapist may assess their symptoms differently
Initial depression score was higher in telephone group, suggest that telephone might not work for less severe symptomsno
PPT:
Some ppt dropped out, affect similarity between 2 groups
Only UK, high individualist culture, not work for collective culture
Ethics: Approved by ethic committee, gave consent
Application: Telephone can save more time
Obsession vs compulsion. Reccuring, unwanted thoughts that cause anxiety VS repetitive behavior people do to relieve that anxiety
Common fear: contamination, forgetting something, obsession with number, order and arrangement, unwanted violence thoughts
Diagnosed when occur 1 hour+ a day and negative impact on life
Some patient are aware of their problem (high insight), some has low insight and believe their actions are normal or else bad things will happen (wash hands every minute)\
Mini study: A boy feel something sticky on his skin, afraid to touch honey. He take showers multiple times a day and can’t go to school
To classify different OCD symptoms, separate OCD from other disorder and normal people
How to collect data?
Self-report question, 30 true false. 21+ is cut off score
What does it measure?
Statement about daily struggles
“I often check if the door is locked”. True/false
Test-retest
Only true false, no qualitative data. Might lack situation that ppt face in real life\
Cultural differences: Developed using British ppt
Assess severity of OCD
How data is collected?
Semi-structured interview, Scale 0-4 on severity of symptoms last week
What does it measure?
5 items about obsession and 5 about compulsion
Inter-rater reliability. 2 doctors assess the same patient give same accurate result
Good test-retest
Nomothetic (rating scale) + idiographic (interview)
Limited severity range
Cultural bias: Developed in Western countries
% parent, sibling, twin
Polygenic
Serotonin
Dopamine
Synapse
36% at least 1 parent with OCD
22% have sibling with OCD
87% MZ, 47% DZ
(OCD the most inheritable disorder. Such difference between MZ and DZ suggest that OCD is due to nature)
230 genes linked to OCD
5-HHT and serotonin (imbalance)
OCD linked to genes related to serotonin receptors & transporter molecule (MAO-A)
Mutation in 5-HTT gene make patient more vulnerable to OCD
DRD4, COMT and dopamine (imbalance)
DRD4: gene codes for D4 dopamine receptor. Dopamine imbalance cause OCD
COMT gene (enzyme breaks down dopamine), low level cause OCD
Polymorphism of COMT as well
SLITRK5 and BDNF
SLITRK5: synapse development and grow
Associated with protein BDNF: maintain connectivity between brain cell
Lack SLITRK5 and BDNF cause OCD
Biological determinism. Scientists remove SLITRK5 gene from mice, and they show compulsive behavior.
Lack nurture view. OCD symptoms differ to society culture. Brazil OCD mostly related to violence, but Singapore OCD is not so.
Low serotonin, serotonin is used in brain communication, disrupt communication cause OCD
Problems with dopamine receptor & transmitter
Problems with production of BDNF
High levels of Oxytocin
Caused by upregulation, OCD have too much DNA methylation that decrease OXTR gene (oxytocin producer). Oxytocin irregularities may cause OCD
Understanding biochemical helped make drugs
Holistic, DNA can be changed with impact from environment.
Too reductionist. Didn’t consider environment factor. Negative reinforcement make patient believe their repetitive behavior is necessary to relive tension
We have lots of thoughts a day. We normally ignore random thoughts. But OCD doesn’t ignore them, thought there are meaning behind those random thoughts.
If patient try to suppress those thoughts, they will come back even worse cause now that they pay attention to it instead of forgetting it
Thought-action fusion (believe thinking about a behavior is as bad as actually doing it, like imagine killing parent and blame yourself for thinking about it).
Thought-event fusion (think about a event will make it come true)
Compulsive behavior developed to reduce anxiety, negative reinforcement + avoidance = OCD feel that compulsive behavior is needed to avoid stress
When Id’s desires are not satisfied, they become obsessive thoughts
Unresolved conflict with parents during anal stage. Child become anally retentive and fixated at that stage. Excessive cleaning to resolve childhood trauma.
Situational explanation. Difficult childhood trauma lead to OCD
Only consider nuture, lack nature view. (Thobois et al) A man did surgery & damanged brain worry circuit, develop OCD right after surgery
Individual + situational. OCD is different between people (A fear of contaminating other, B fear of being contaminated). Situational factors worsen stress
Stop serotonin transporter (SERT) + noradrenaline transporter (NET) from being reabsorbed into presynaptic cell membranes
More SERT + NET around to bind with receptors
To increase serotonin and noradrenaline level
OCD caused by communication problem in brain, nerve communicate through serotonin
SSRI stop reuptake of serotonin by binding with SERT and stop serotonin from being transported
Increase serotonin to bind with 5HT receptors on postsynaptic cell
Use with risperidone to increase effectiveness
SSRIs side effects: nausea, vomiting, sleep problem
Too reductionist: 60% report no improvement, situation factor like relationship between patient and doctor affect drug effectiveness
A type of CBT
Exposure: expose patient to anxiety-provoking situation
Response prevention: stop patient from doing compulsive behavior when facing those situations
Patient identify obsession thoughts +environmental trigger that cause compulsive action
Put into SUDS rating, triggering situation arranged into hierarchy
Expose patient to situation until they habituate the stimulus (reduced arousal level)
Therapist teach patient that they are still safe without their compulsive behavior (not washing hands when touching door knob)
Don’t use relaxation technique (keep it realistic)
Alternative for drugs, no side effect
High generalizability, work for multiple OCDs
Difficult for inexperience therapist to deliver
New compulsion can occur unless ERP treat core underlying fear => need patient being honest about trigger stimuli
Mini study:
Jason has OCD
Ten 50 minute sessions of ERP over 16 weeks
Exposure – getting Jason to touch objects like door handle
Response prevention – reducing anxiety and need for behavior by using coping statements
After therapy score on Y-BOCS dropped from 18 to 3
Non-inferiority trial: test whether a new treatment is not worse than an existing one
Compare face to face + telephone CBT for OCD
72 (age range 16-65, match age, gender, income) OCD from UK, ppt used medicine are removed. Opportunity
Split into 2 groups randomly, face to face or telephone
Patient complete Y-BOCS, BDI and client satisfaction questionnaire twice (establish baseline twice, to replace control group), the psychologist assessed this did not know which condition ppt is in
Face to face group: 10 one hour weekly sessions of ERP
Telephone group: 8 30 minute weekly telephone sessions of ERP + 2 face to face meetings (first and last session of treatment)
Do the same questionnaire later => No differences in improvement and client satisfaction after 6 months
Telephone is as effective as face-to-face even the time is shorter
Used both Y-BOCS + BDI (good test retest and check for reliability). patient who used drugs were also removed to ensure only CBT affect symptoms
The score between 2 baseline test did not change much, suggesting that symptoms do not improve without ERP (compensate for lack of control group)
Random ppt allocation to 2 groups, avoid ppt variables. Gender, age, income are similar across groups
Psychologist blind
Good size sample and age range
13% revealed to therapist which group they are in, therapist may assess their symptoms differently
Initial depression score was higher in telephone group, suggest that telephone might not work for less severe symptomsno
PPT:
Some ppt dropped out, affect similarity between 2 groups
Only UK, high individualist culture, not work for collective culture
Ethics: Approved by ethic committee, gave consent
Application: Telephone can save more time