Developmental Theories: A perspective on crime suggesting that as individuals progress through life stages, their experiences significantly shape their behavioral patterns and decision-making.
Key Questions:
Why do some offenders persist in criminal careers while others desist as they mature?
What causes escalations in criminal activity versus turning points towards rehabilitation?
Are there distinct patterns among different types of offenders?
Criminal Experiences: Individuals enter criminal behavior at different life stages; some early ("precocious") and some later ("late starters").
Early Onset of Behavior:
Engaging in antisocial behavior during adolescence increases the likelihood of a sustained criminal career into adulthood.
Early rule breaking can weaken inhibitory controls and strengthen motivations for criminal acts.
Early-onset criminals display behaviors like truancy, cruelty, lying, and theft; often, they exhibit higher violence rates compared to peers.
Developmental Consequences: Early delinquent acts foster negative familial relationships, weaken ties to conventional peers, and diminish engagement in lawful activities.
Latent Trait Theory:
Posits that a master trait or inherent propensity for crime is present from early life and influences behavior continuously.
Higher risks of criminal conduct are linked to traits like low intelligence, impulsivity, and lack of social bonds.
General Theory of Crime: Developed by Gottfredson and Hirschi, connecting low self-control to criminal acts, suggesting that people lacking self-control are more inclined to reoffend when opportunities arise.
Life Course Theory:
Sees criminality as dynamic and influenced by individual changes and social interactions across life stages.
Encourages understanding how factors such as family, peers, and relationships can reshape criminal behavior.
State Dependence: Suggests antisocial behaviors erode conforming social bonds and create incentives for crime, needing stability in life transitions to foster desistance.
Age-Graded Theory:
Introduced by Robert Sampson and John Laub, focusing on significant life events ("turning points") that divert individuals from criminal paths.
Building social capital (positive relationships that support legitimate lifestyles) can help reduce criminal behavior, while unsuccessful encounters with relationships and employment can perpetuate crime.
Trajectory Theory:
Proposes multiple pathways leading to criminality; not all offenders follow the same trajectory.
Differentiates between adolescent-limited offenders (temporary teenagers) and life-course persistent offenders, whose early criminal behavior leads to sustained issues throughout life.
Victim Precipitation: Highlights that victims can influence their crime involvement through their behaviors, with two types:
Active Precipitation: When a victim's provocative actions instigate crime.
Passive Precipitation: When a victim's characteristics unintentionally attract crime.
Lifestyle Theory: Positions that individual lifestyle choices can increase victimization risk by engaging in behaviors that expose them to criminals.
Routine Activities Theory: Correlates crime incidence to everyday behaviors through the lens of three key components: motivated offenders, suitable targets, and lack of capable guardians.
Findings: Ensuring protective measures (capable guardians) can deter crime; lifestyle habits impact exposure to victimization.