Populations can overshoot carrying capacity and subsequently crash
Carrying capacity can also change through time as well. Following an “overshot” of the population, K often declines
Predator-prey cycles: lynx and hare. Hare increases in population, and lynx follows but delayed trends
Bottom-up hypothesis (about lacks on food chain): when their populations reach high density, hares use up all their food and starve; in response, lynx also starve
Top-down hypothesis (about mega carnivores and predators): lynx populations reach high density in response to increases in hare density. At high density, lynx eat so many hares that the prey population crashes.
Krebs and colleagues studied this: different plots with different environments
3 control plots, 1 plot with no lynx, 2 plots with extra food for hares, and 1 plot with no lynx and extra food for the hares
Conclusion: Hare populations are limited by both predation and food availability. When predation and food limitation occur together, they have a greater effect than either factor does independently.
Plot 3 would support the bottom up hypothesis
Plot 2 would suppose the top down hypothesis
Stable fecundity = available resources
Pyramid shaped fecundity = scarce resources
Human carrying capacity: has it changed? When will our population stop growing?
Commensalism — least studied and least supported type of interaction. Could be fake lol. (+/0)
Competition — extremely common interaction. Lowers the fitness of all individuals involved. Intraspecific or interspecific. Negative for both. Most species avoid competing with other species.
Niche: the range of resources that the species is able to use, or the range of conditions it can tolerate
Experiments by GF Gause in the 30’s used Paramecium to study competition
Separately, two paramecium species showed logistic growth
Together, with the same food supply, only one species showed logistic growth (but with reduced carrying capacity). In contrast, the second species was driven to extinction