knowt ap exam guide logo

unit 1.1-1.3 (ideals and types of democracy & government power and individual rights)

1.1

Origins and The Enlightenment

Classical Origins

  • societies like ancient greece and ancient rome had rare forms of early democracy

    • ancient greece: athenian democracy

      • the assembly: officials of the democracy were in part elected by the assembly and in large part chosen by lottery in a process called sortition

      • citizenship: white, native-born, land-owning man

    • ancient rome: republic in rome

      • the senate: representative of the roman people and the repository of roman sovereignty

      • consuls: held the highest elected political office of the roman republic

  • english heritage: determined by the era of time

    • magna carta (1215): nobles vs. king john; limited monarchy to guarantee nobles rights and protections

    • parliament

      • house of lords

      • house of commons

    • petition of right (1628): applied protections of magna carta to rest of english citizens; restricted the monarchy further

    • english bill of rights (1689): consisted of the following conditions:

      • free parliamentary elections

      • speedy trials

      • prohibit cruel and unusual punishment

      • petition the monarch

      • no taxation without consent of parliament

The Enlightenment (16th-18th Centuries)

  • age of reason: inspired by scientific revolution; empiricism and logic applied to human behavior

    • break from tradition, hereditary, and fundamentalism

  • natural laws: applied to society (natural rights); each individual born with natural rights (life, liberty, and property)

  • social contracts: established relationships between citizens and governments; based on mutual consent

Enlightenment from England

  • thomas hobbes: believed in a “strong but not absolute” government; started social contract

    • leviathan (1651): state of nature (“the war of all against all”)

    • social contract theory: people submit to government but have the right to overthrow

  • john locke: added on natural rights

    • second treatise on civil government (1689): right to revolution; consent of the governed; enforced state of nature (life, liberty, and land)

  • baron de montesquieu: spirit of the laws (1748); separation of powers; checks and balances

  • voltaire: advocated individual freedoms; criticized traditional institutions

  • rousseau: believed in government being based on consent of governed (popular sovereignty)

Colonial America

Colonial Governments

  • house of burgesses (1619): representative form of government in virginia

  • mayflower compact (1620): social contract for common good/survival

  • fundamental orders of connecticut (1639): first written constitution; outlined individual rights

Colonial Resistance

  • navigation acts: proclamation of 1763, sugar act (1764), stamp act (1765)

  • ideological arguments: no taxation without representation; virtual representation

  • first continental congress: declaration of right and grievances; petition to the king

  • second continental congress: olive branch petition; declaration of independence (1776); articles of confederation (1777, 1781)

    • olive branch petition: written to persuade king george III of england to respond to the concerns of the american colonists and to settle their differences amicably

    • declaration of independence: based largely on locke’s ideas; primarily written by thomas jefferson

      • political theory, list of grievances, colonial unity for independence

New Constitution

New State Constitutions

most state constitutions

massachusetts

-natural rights and higher law-social contract-popular sovereignty-separation of powers-representation-checks and balances-legislative supremacy

-preamble-declaration of rights-frame of government (three branches and separation of powers)-articles of amendment

Articles of Confederation vs. Constitution

articles of confederation

constitution

levying taxes

congress could request states to pay; no real taxing power

congress has right to levy taxes on individuals

federal courts

no system of federal courts

court system created to deal with issues between citizens, states, etc.

executive

no executive power; president of u.s. presided only over congress

executive branch headed by president who chooses cabinet and has checks on power of judiciary and legislature

amending document

13/13 need to amend articles; unanimous

2/3 of both houses of congress and 3/4 of state legislatures or national convention

representation of states

each state had 1 vote regardless of size

upper house (senate) has 2 votes; lower house (h.o.r) based on population

New Constitution Establishments

  • constitutional convention: called to revise a.o.c

    • washington elected as president

    • grand committee established (one person per state)

  • new government w/ 3 branches

    • powers of each branch listed

  • established a representative republic

    • reps are selected by public every 2 years

1.2

Types of Democracy

Representative Democracy

  • a system where citizens of a country vote for government representatives to handle legislation and rule the country on their behalf

  • rep democracies can take several forms along the following scale:

    • participatory democracy ↔ pluralist democracy ↔ elite democracy

Participatory (Direct) Democracy

  • a system where the citizens (not representatives) propose laws (initiatives) and vote directly for laws (referendums)

    • initiatives: citizens of a state can place an item on the ballot for popular vote

    • referendums: citizens can attempt to defeat or uphold a law of the legislature via petitions

    • both can occur at state, county, or municipality level

      • states can be classified as:

        • both initiatives and referendums

        • initiatives for constitutional amendments only

        • referendums only

        • neither initiatives or referendums

  • large populations make this difficult at a national level

    • primarily used a local and state levels

  • emphasizes broad participation in politics and civil society

Pluralist Democracy

  • a system where no one group dominates politics and organized (interest) groups compete to influence policy

    • recognizes group-based activism by non-governmental interests striving for impact on decision-making

  • interest groups try to influence local, state, and federal level policy makers

  • the variety and number of interest groups make decision-making process slow

  • constitution protects against undue influence via bicameral legislature, electoral college, etc.

Elite Democracy

  • a system where elected representatives make decisions in their role as trustees

    • the reps have the skills, education, and ability to protect against unwise popular policies

  • house, senate, and cabinet are all examples of elite democracy

Tensions Over Democracy Models

federal government

state governments

supreme law of land

make own laws

elite model

participatory democracy (possible)

senators elected by state legislatures originally

cities and towns have some autonomy

  • both federal and state democracies have interest groups that operate at all (national, state, and local) levels to influence policy making

Representative Democracy in US Today

  • participatory

    • initiatives

      • in 26 states

    • referendums examples

      • control wages, covid, voting rights for felons

  • pluralist

    • raise money, support candidates, and monitor government

    • advertise to push (candidate) agenda

  • elite

    • people in government have most (time, money, education, access)

1.3

Federalist and Brutus Papers

notable federalists

notable antifederalists

-george clinton -robert yates-patrick henry -mercy otis warren-melancton smith -george mason

-alexander hamilton -james madison -john jay-gouverneur morris-edmund randolph

  • written by alexander hamilton, john jay, and james madison

    • 85 essays supporting ratification of constitution

  • need to know federalist papers:

    • federalist #10: factions

    • federalist #51: checks and balances

    • federalist #70: chief executive

    • federalist #78: national judiciary

  • need to know brutus paper:

    • brutus #1: republic is too big and non-democratic

      • factions will destroy the nation

      • citizens won’t know their reps

      • bill of rights must be added

  • federalists: supported ratification of constitution; led by james madison

    • published federalist papers to convince americans to ratify constitution

    • in favor of strong national government and weaker state governments

    • didn’t want a bill of rights to limit right only to those listed

    • usually large landowners, wealthy merchants, and professionals

    • indirect election of officials and longer terms served

  • anti-federalists: opposed ratification of constitution; led by patrick henry

    • published brutus papers to discourage americans from ratifying the constitution

    • supported strong states rights and weak national government

    • insisted on adding bill of rights

    • usually small farmers, shopkeepers, and laborers

    • direct election for reps and shorter terms served

anti-federalists

federalists

constitution and nature of republic government

-thought constitution would destroy states-preferred a confederacy of small republics -delegate power to central authority to preserve union

-wanted large republic necessary to secure the public good and private rights from tyranny of the majority

house of reps

-disagreement between small-state and large-state antifederalists -too small a body to represent diverse interests-preferred one year (short) terms

-house would grow over time -two terms allowed for more understanding of complexity of government

senate

-denounced aristocratic nature-advice and consent violated separation of powers

-equality of states essential to passage of constitution -to pass legislation both senate and h.o.r must agree

presidency

-pres could easily become king and subject to special interests-too much influence on legislation and treaties

-limited power and subject to the will of the people (by election) and congress (impeachment)-necessary to enforce federal laws

national judiciary

-possessed too broad a power (especially over state courts and jurisdictions)

-act as intermediary between people and congress-protected the people

bill of rights

-states offered no protection against potential abuses of rights of federal government

-unnecessary and potentially dangerous

A

unit 1.1-1.3 (ideals and types of democracy & government power and individual rights)

1.1

Origins and The Enlightenment

Classical Origins

  • societies like ancient greece and ancient rome had rare forms of early democracy

    • ancient greece: athenian democracy

      • the assembly: officials of the democracy were in part elected by the assembly and in large part chosen by lottery in a process called sortition

      • citizenship: white, native-born, land-owning man

    • ancient rome: republic in rome

      • the senate: representative of the roman people and the repository of roman sovereignty

      • consuls: held the highest elected political office of the roman republic

  • english heritage: determined by the era of time

    • magna carta (1215): nobles vs. king john; limited monarchy to guarantee nobles rights and protections

    • parliament

      • house of lords

      • house of commons

    • petition of right (1628): applied protections of magna carta to rest of english citizens; restricted the monarchy further

    • english bill of rights (1689): consisted of the following conditions:

      • free parliamentary elections

      • speedy trials

      • prohibit cruel and unusual punishment

      • petition the monarch

      • no taxation without consent of parliament

The Enlightenment (16th-18th Centuries)

  • age of reason: inspired by scientific revolution; empiricism and logic applied to human behavior

    • break from tradition, hereditary, and fundamentalism

  • natural laws: applied to society (natural rights); each individual born with natural rights (life, liberty, and property)

  • social contracts: established relationships between citizens and governments; based on mutual consent

Enlightenment from England

  • thomas hobbes: believed in a “strong but not absolute” government; started social contract

    • leviathan (1651): state of nature (“the war of all against all”)

    • social contract theory: people submit to government but have the right to overthrow

  • john locke: added on natural rights

    • second treatise on civil government (1689): right to revolution; consent of the governed; enforced state of nature (life, liberty, and land)

  • baron de montesquieu: spirit of the laws (1748); separation of powers; checks and balances

  • voltaire: advocated individual freedoms; criticized traditional institutions

  • rousseau: believed in government being based on consent of governed (popular sovereignty)

Colonial America

Colonial Governments

  • house of burgesses (1619): representative form of government in virginia

  • mayflower compact (1620): social contract for common good/survival

  • fundamental orders of connecticut (1639): first written constitution; outlined individual rights

Colonial Resistance

  • navigation acts: proclamation of 1763, sugar act (1764), stamp act (1765)

  • ideological arguments: no taxation without representation; virtual representation

  • first continental congress: declaration of right and grievances; petition to the king

  • second continental congress: olive branch petition; declaration of independence (1776); articles of confederation (1777, 1781)

    • olive branch petition: written to persuade king george III of england to respond to the concerns of the american colonists and to settle their differences amicably

    • declaration of independence: based largely on locke’s ideas; primarily written by thomas jefferson

      • political theory, list of grievances, colonial unity for independence

New Constitution

New State Constitutions

most state constitutions

massachusetts

-natural rights and higher law-social contract-popular sovereignty-separation of powers-representation-checks and balances-legislative supremacy

-preamble-declaration of rights-frame of government (three branches and separation of powers)-articles of amendment

Articles of Confederation vs. Constitution

articles of confederation

constitution

levying taxes

congress could request states to pay; no real taxing power

congress has right to levy taxes on individuals

federal courts

no system of federal courts

court system created to deal with issues between citizens, states, etc.

executive

no executive power; president of u.s. presided only over congress

executive branch headed by president who chooses cabinet and has checks on power of judiciary and legislature

amending document

13/13 need to amend articles; unanimous

2/3 of both houses of congress and 3/4 of state legislatures or national convention

representation of states

each state had 1 vote regardless of size

upper house (senate) has 2 votes; lower house (h.o.r) based on population

New Constitution Establishments

  • constitutional convention: called to revise a.o.c

    • washington elected as president

    • grand committee established (one person per state)

  • new government w/ 3 branches

    • powers of each branch listed

  • established a representative republic

    • reps are selected by public every 2 years

1.2

Types of Democracy

Representative Democracy

  • a system where citizens of a country vote for government representatives to handle legislation and rule the country on their behalf

  • rep democracies can take several forms along the following scale:

    • participatory democracy ↔ pluralist democracy ↔ elite democracy

Participatory (Direct) Democracy

  • a system where the citizens (not representatives) propose laws (initiatives) and vote directly for laws (referendums)

    • initiatives: citizens of a state can place an item on the ballot for popular vote

    • referendums: citizens can attempt to defeat or uphold a law of the legislature via petitions

    • both can occur at state, county, or municipality level

      • states can be classified as:

        • both initiatives and referendums

        • initiatives for constitutional amendments only

        • referendums only

        • neither initiatives or referendums

  • large populations make this difficult at a national level

    • primarily used a local and state levels

  • emphasizes broad participation in politics and civil society

Pluralist Democracy

  • a system where no one group dominates politics and organized (interest) groups compete to influence policy

    • recognizes group-based activism by non-governmental interests striving for impact on decision-making

  • interest groups try to influence local, state, and federal level policy makers

  • the variety and number of interest groups make decision-making process slow

  • constitution protects against undue influence via bicameral legislature, electoral college, etc.

Elite Democracy

  • a system where elected representatives make decisions in their role as trustees

    • the reps have the skills, education, and ability to protect against unwise popular policies

  • house, senate, and cabinet are all examples of elite democracy

Tensions Over Democracy Models

federal government

state governments

supreme law of land

make own laws

elite model

participatory democracy (possible)

senators elected by state legislatures originally

cities and towns have some autonomy

  • both federal and state democracies have interest groups that operate at all (national, state, and local) levels to influence policy making

Representative Democracy in US Today

  • participatory

    • initiatives

      • in 26 states

    • referendums examples

      • control wages, covid, voting rights for felons

  • pluralist

    • raise money, support candidates, and monitor government

    • advertise to push (candidate) agenda

  • elite

    • people in government have most (time, money, education, access)

1.3

Federalist and Brutus Papers

notable federalists

notable antifederalists

-george clinton -robert yates-patrick henry -mercy otis warren-melancton smith -george mason

-alexander hamilton -james madison -john jay-gouverneur morris-edmund randolph

  • written by alexander hamilton, john jay, and james madison

    • 85 essays supporting ratification of constitution

  • need to know federalist papers:

    • federalist #10: factions

    • federalist #51: checks and balances

    • federalist #70: chief executive

    • federalist #78: national judiciary

  • need to know brutus paper:

    • brutus #1: republic is too big and non-democratic

      • factions will destroy the nation

      • citizens won’t know their reps

      • bill of rights must be added

  • federalists: supported ratification of constitution; led by james madison

    • published federalist papers to convince americans to ratify constitution

    • in favor of strong national government and weaker state governments

    • didn’t want a bill of rights to limit right only to those listed

    • usually large landowners, wealthy merchants, and professionals

    • indirect election of officials and longer terms served

  • anti-federalists: opposed ratification of constitution; led by patrick henry

    • published brutus papers to discourage americans from ratifying the constitution

    • supported strong states rights and weak national government

    • insisted on adding bill of rights

    • usually small farmers, shopkeepers, and laborers

    • direct election for reps and shorter terms served

anti-federalists

federalists

constitution and nature of republic government

-thought constitution would destroy states-preferred a confederacy of small republics -delegate power to central authority to preserve union

-wanted large republic necessary to secure the public good and private rights from tyranny of the majority

house of reps

-disagreement between small-state and large-state antifederalists -too small a body to represent diverse interests-preferred one year (short) terms

-house would grow over time -two terms allowed for more understanding of complexity of government

senate

-denounced aristocratic nature-advice and consent violated separation of powers

-equality of states essential to passage of constitution -to pass legislation both senate and h.o.r must agree

presidency

-pres could easily become king and subject to special interests-too much influence on legislation and treaties

-limited power and subject to the will of the people (by election) and congress (impeachment)-necessary to enforce federal laws

national judiciary

-possessed too broad a power (especially over state courts and jurisdictions)

-act as intermediary between people and congress-protected the people

bill of rights

-states offered no protection against potential abuses of rights of federal government

-unnecessary and potentially dangerous