manifest destiny
manifest destiny: americans had a god-given right for land from atlantic to pacific
natural resources – economic opportunities – provide land for religious refuge (eg. mormons) – american institutions are superior
facilitated by legislation
preemption acts: gave squatters the right to settle public lands and purchase them for low prices once the government put them up for sale
gold rush: huge migrations
southerners needed more arable land due to their depletion of soil in their homelands
ostend manifesto (failure)
recommendation that us offer spain $20 million for cuba
ultimately unsuccessful, partially due to cuba's probable entry as a slave state
gadsden purchase
franklin pierce purchased new mexico + arizona from mexico for $10 million
the mexican-american war
texas belonged to mexico, americans settled there → slavery was illegal, settlers must convert to catholicism; settlers rebel, becomes independent
mexico warns us that this will lead to war but we’re like idc bitch bite me or smth
disagreement over southern border → mexican-american war
ended with treaty of guadalupe hidalgo: establishes southern border as rio grande, mexican cession → gain huge chunk of land in west (FAMILIARIZE)
wilmot provisio: ban slavery in all this territory – ultimately struck down but indicative of growing tension created by westward expansion
attempts to resolve conflicts over the spread of slavery
compromise of 1850: what to do on slavery in new territories?
southerners: slavery protected constitutionally → missouri compromise can be extended to pacific, not just over louisiana purchase
free soil (northern dems, whigs): all should be free territory
popular sovereignty: people living in territories can decide for themselves
california + new mexico apply as free states – threats from southern legislators to secede
compromise (henry clay) divided mexican cession into parts that would decide for themselves, california would be admitted as a free state, slave trade outlawed in dc,
stricter fugitive slave law
absolutely bring back any fugitive slaves → causes biggest amount of contention
not all northerners are abolitionists, just didn’t want to think about slavery but this would make it active → radicalizes many northerners
kansas-nebraska act: nebraska territory divided in two, popular sovereignty (both above 36’30” line – missouri compromise)
overturns missouri compromise which had had scriptural authority
bleeding kansas – further division
crittenden compromise (late-stage)
policy that attempted to prevent civil war by offering a constitutional amendment by recognizing slavery in territories south of the 36'30" line, congressional noninterference with existing slave states, and compensation to the owners of fugitive slaves
defeated by republicans
immigration
mainly irish + german, kept cultures through ethnic enclaves
irish mainly kept to urban areas whereas germans moved out west to farm
nativist backlash
nativism: native-born rights protected over immigrants
anti-catholic movement → know-nothing party to limit immigrant cultural influence
policies + events leading to secession
differences in labor economies
north: paid industrial labor
south: agricultural slave labor
many northerners didn’t object to slavery from morality – undermines their ability to work for wages
free soil movement emerges: expansion of slavery is incompatible with labor of free workers
abolitionism
underground railroad: helped enslaved people escape to the north
uncle tom’s cabin: turned northern opinion against slavery morally
constitutionality of slavery
southerners: constitution protected slavery; 10 amendment (any law not dictated by federal government is passed to the states)
combined with white supremacy – less human, fuels worldview
dred scott decision: no real free/slave states anymore
john brown’s raid on harpers ferry, virginia
arm enslaved people + incite slave rebellion
southerners fear that this is the view of all northerners
political parties
southern democratcs: protect slavery
northern republicans (whigs, free soilers): contain slavery
the election of 1860 and southern secession
if lincoln won, he would contain slavery rather than abolish it
southern pov: free states would grow + gain a political majority
southern secession preserve slavery, protect states’ rights over federal overreach
the confederate states of america
convention in south carolina voted unanimously to secede in 1860
s carolina, georgia, florida, alabama, mississippi, louisiana, and texas
confederacy formed in 1861
president jefferson davis, vp alexander stephens
the civil war
south in a better position – better generals, fighting a defensive war
north prevailed because:
greater population, urban manufacturing hubs
possessed industry + banks (manufacturing)
railroads
lincoln → good leader, war to preserve union
shifts scope via emancipation proclamation – military tactic, frees all slaves in confederate states – war against slavery
south needs british aid to win, but they’d just gone through emancipation themselves; this shift prevents their aid
devastated southern infrastructure
sherman’s march – scorched earth from atlanta to savannah
battle of fort sumter → sc, april 12, 1861
border states: delaware, maryland, missouri, kentucky
pros/cons of both sides
union pros
had to attack
bigger population
controlled economy
strong central government
confederacy pros
had to defend
better generals
battle of bull run → not going to be a short war
union strategy: anaconda plan (choke out the south, naval blockade, control mississippi to split south)
know union generals!
emancipation proclamation
january 1, 1863
delayed until lincoln gained support of conservative northerners
only applied to confederate states
reconstruction
13th amendment: abolished slavery
14th amendment: states must provide everyone within their borders equal protection under the law, citizenship for all naturalized citizens
15th amendment: voting rights to black men
all men can (legally) vote
south remained under occupation by federal soldiers to make sure these requirements are met
southerners upset by this – republicans debate southern treatment
conquered foes or long-lost family members?
lincoln wants reconciliation but is soon assassinated
andrew johnson becomes president, contended with radical republicans – punish south for the war
congress-dominated reconstruction process
wade-davis bill
demanding terms for reentry into the union → majority of voters must take loyalty oath for state government to be accepted back, only non-confederates could vote for new state constitutions
ultimate failure of reconstruction
introduction of sharecropping (still agricultural): contract former slaves
unlimited amounts of work, bound to work on plantation
white supremacy: secret societies to terrorize black people into submission (eg. kkk)
black codes: prevent black people from owning land, borrowing money, getting ahead in general
plessy v ferguson: separate but equal facilities are legal (not equal at all)
northern weariness – election of 1876, led to compromise of ‘77
democrats allowed rutherford b hayes (republican) to be president in exchange for federal troops to be removed from the south
freedmen's bureau
organization run by the union army to care for + protect black people in the south following the civil war
amnesty acts
allowed confederate officials back into southern governments + allowed them to vote in elections