Defining Psychology and Exploring its Roots
Psychology (2) is the scientific study of behavior and mental processes
Science (2): uses systematic methods to observe human behavior and draw conclusions
Goal is to describe, predict, and explain behavior
Behavior (2): everything we do that can be directly observed
Two people kissing, a baby crying
Mental processes (2): thoughts, feelings, motives that each of us experience privately but that cannot be observed directly
Ex: thinking about kissing someone, a baby’s feelings when its mother leaves the room
The Psychological Frame of Mind
Tests assumptions, bringing scientific data to bear on the questions of central interest to human beings
Critical Thinking (3): process of thinking deeply and actively, asking questions and evaluating the evidence
Curiosity: asks questions about observations
Skepticism: challenge whether a supposed fact is true
Objectivity: psychological research is sometimes counterintuitive, being objective involves trying to see things as they are, not just as the observer would like them to be
Scientific knowledge ultimately is based on objective evidence
Empirical Method (4): gaining knowledge through observation of events, collection of data, logical reasoning
Psychology has advanced as a field because psychologists do not always agree with one another about why mind and behavior work the way they do
Reached a more accurate understanding of human behavior because psychology fosters controversies
psychologists think deeply and examine the evidence of all sides
Psychology as the Science of All Human Behavior
Many settings of psychology → clinical, industrial, private practice, schools, academic
Sigmund Freud: believed most human behavior was caused by dark, unpleasant, conscious impulses pressing for expression
Seeks to understand the truths of human life in all its dimensions (including best and worst experiences)
Ex: studies about forgiveness in the Amish community
Relationship between religious commitment and forgiveness
The cognitive skills required for forgiveness, potential dark side of forgiveness
Some insist that human weakness are the most important aspect of life but the fact is that to be a general science of human behavior
Psychology must address all sides of human experience
Psychology in Historical Perspective
Seeks to answer questions
How do we learn?
What is memory?
Why does one person grow and flourish while another struggles?
Ancient myths attributed to important events to pleasure/displeasure of gods → gave way to philosophy
Rational investigation of the underlying principles of being and knowledge
Socrates, Plato, Aristotle debated nature of thought and behavior - link between mind and body
Descartes argued that mind and body were completely separate and should focus on the mind
Researchers who study emotion talk about Descartes and scientists who study happiness refer to Aristotle
Wilhelm Wundt: created psychology by combining philosophy and natural sciences
Experiment to measure time lag between hearing a sound and pressed a key showed the idea that mental processes could be measured
Structuralism (6): Wundty focused on discovering the basic elements of mental processes
Focus on identifying the structures of the human mind → introspection
William James: key question is not so much what the mind is (structure) as what it is for (function)
Functionalism (7): probed the functions and purposes of the mind and behavior in the individual adaptation to the environment
Structuralists looked inside the mind and searched for its structures
Functionalists focused on what was going on in human interactions with the outside word and try to understand the purpose of thoughts
Fundamental question: why is human thought adaptive?
Asks why are people better off because they can think than they would be otherwise?
Structuralism - what of the mind
Functionalism: why
James did not believe in existence of rigid structures of the mind (flexible and called it a stream of consciousness)
Functionalism fit well with evolution through natural selection (7) by Darwin on On the origin of Species
Biological Approach (8): evolutionary process in which organisms that are best adapted to their environment will survive and produce offspring
Structuralism won the battle to become the birthplace of psychology but functionalism won the war
Psychologist continue to talk about the adaptive nature of human characteristics
Contemporary Approaches to Psychology
The Biological Approach
Focus on the body (brain and nervous system)
Neuroscience (9): study of the structure, function, development, genetics, biochemistry of the nervous system
Emphasizes that the brain and nervous system are central to understanding behavior, thought, emotion
Believe that thoughts and emotions have a physical basis in the brain
Electrical impulses enable us to think, feel and behave
The Behavioral Approach (9)
Emphasizes the scientific study of the observable behavioral responses and their environmental determinants
Focuses on organism’s visible interactions with the environment - behaviors, not thoughts or feelings
Developed under John Watson and B.F. Skinner
Behaviorism dominated research during first half of 20th century
Skinner emphasized that it should be about what people do (actions and behaviors)
Not be concerned with things that cannot be seen (thoughts, feelings, goals)
Believed rewards and punishments determine behavior
The Psychodynamic Approach (9)
Emphasizes unconscious thoughts, conflict between biological drives (drive for sex) and society’s demands and early childhood family experiences
Freud theorized that early relationships with parents shape an individual’s personality
Psychoanalysis: an analyst’s unlocking a person’s unconscious conflicts by talking with the individual about their childhood memories, feelings
Today, less emphasis on sexual drive and more on cultural/social experiences as determinants of behavior
The Humanistic Approach (10)
Emphasizes person’s positive qualities, capacity for positive growth, freedom to choose one’s destiny
Stress that people have the ability to control their lives and not controlled by environment
The Cognitive Approach (10)
Emphasizes the mental processes involved in knowing
How we direct our attention, perceive, remember, think, and solve problems
Views the mind as active and aware problem solving system
Contrasts the behavioral outlook,
Portrays behavior is controlled by external environmental forces
The Evolutionary Approach (10)
Uses evolutionary ideas such as adaptation, reproduction, natural selection as basis for explaining specific human behaviors
The Sociocultural Approach (11)
Examines the influences of social and cultural environments on behavior
Understanding that a person’s behavior requires knowing about the cultural context in which the behavior occurs
Requires cross cultural research
See FIG 1 for Areas of Specialization in Psychology
Psychology’s Scientific Method
Science is not defined by what it investigates but how
Scientific method is how to gain knowledge about mind and behavior
Key theme in the scientific method is that knowledge comes from empirical research
Observing some phenomenon: a variable (13) is anything that can change
A theory (14): broad idea/set of closely related ideas that attempts to explain observations
Scientific theory must be falsifiable
Even a scientist who believes that a theory is true must be able to generate ideas about research that would prove the theory wrong and test those ideas
Formulating hypothesis and predictions: a hypothesis (14) is a testable prediction that derived logically from a theory
A theory can generate many hypotheses
If more and more hypotheses related to a theory turn out to be true, the theory gains in credibility
Testing through Empirical Research: operational definition (15) provides an objective description of how a variable is going to be measured and observed in a particular study
Not just one operational definition for any variable
Coming up with operational definitions for variables in study is crucial because there must be a way to see it or measure it
Data Analysis: data refers to all the information collected → must crunch the numbers to see if they support predictions
Self determination theory: people are likely to feel fulfilled when their lives meet three important needs:
Relatedness (warm relations with others)
Autonomy (independence)
Competence (mastering new skills)
Drawing Conclusions: if results of study support predictions, theory may gain credibility but a theory is always open to revision
If a particular research finding is demonstrated again and again across different researchers and different methods, it is considered reliable (dependable result)
Evaluating Conclusions: published papers and multiple revisions
Types of Psychological Research
Descriptive Research
Involves finding out about the basic dimensions of some variable
Describing some phenomenon
Determining its basic dimensions and defining what this thing is, how often it occurs
Cannot probe what causes some phenomenon but can reveal important information about behavior and attitudes
Observation: need to be systematic
Surveys and Interviews: presents standard set of questions to obtain self reported attitude on particular topic, biased
Case Studies (18): in-depth look at a single individual
Performed when unique aspects of a life cannot be duplicated and tested in other individuals
Allows researchers to get a sense of something but cannot answers about how and why
Correlational Research (20)
Interested in discovering relationships between variables
Research that examines the relationships between variables
Purpose is to examine whether and how two variables change together (co-relationship)
Correlation coefficient (r) - shows strength and direction of relationship
CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION
Third variable problem (21): circumstance where a variable that has not been measured accounts for the relationship between two other variables (confounding)
Some questions may involve variables that can only be measured/observed, also valuable in cases where it would be unethical to do it any other way
Researchers often measure many variables in their studies
This way, they can examine whether a relationship between two variables is explained by a third variable
Experience Sampling Method: people report on their daily experiences in a diary a few times a day
Longitudinal Designs (22): systematic observation involves obtaining measures of the variables of interest in multiple waves over time
Can suggest potential causal relationships because if one variable is thought to cause changes in another
It should at least come before that variable in time
Provides ways by which correlational researchers may attempt to demonstrate causal relations among variables
Still, causal relationships are not completely clear
Consider some studies might not have thought of all the potential third variables that might have explained the results
Experimental Research
Establishing causal relationships between variables
Experiment (23): carefully regulated procedure in which researcher manipulates 1+ variables that are believed to influence some other variable
Random Assignment (23): researchers assign participants to groups by chance
Decreases the likelihood that the experiment’s results will be due to any preexisting differences between groups
Independent Variable (23): manipulated experimental factor, changes to see what its effects are
Confederate (24): a person who is given a role to play in a study so the social context can be manipulated
Dependent Variable (24): outcome, factor that can change in an experiment in response to changes in the independent variable
Experimental Group (24): consists of participants in an experiment who receive the treatment that is of interest to researcher
Control Group (24): treated like the experimental group except for the change
Provides a comparison against which the researcher can test the effects of the independent variable
Within-participant design: participants serve as their own control group, the same group of participants experience various conditions in the study
Quasi-Experimental Design: does not include random assignment of participants to a condition because assignment is impossible or unethical
Validity (25): soundness of the conclusions that a researcher draws from an experiment
External Validity (25): refers to the degree to which an experimental design really reflects the real world issues it’s supposed to address
Internal Validity (25): degree to which changes in the dependent variable are due to the manipulation of the independent variable
Experimenter Bias (25): occurs when the experimenter's expectations influence the outcome of the research
Demand characteristics (25): any aspects of a study that communicate to the participants how the experimenter wants them to behave
Introduces systematic differences between experimental and control groups - creates confounds
Research Participant Bias (25): occurs when the behavior of research participants during the experiment is influenced by how they think they are supposed to behave/expectations about what is happening to them
Placebo Effect (26): when participants’s expectations, rather than experimental treatment, produce an outcome
Placebo (26): harmless substance that has no physiological effect
Double Blind Experiment (26): neither the experimenter administering the treatment nor the participants are aware of which participants are in the experimental group and which are in the control group
Allows researchers to identify the specific effects of the independent variable from possible effects of the experimenters’ and participants’ expectations about it
See FIG. 2 for psychology’s research methods applied to studying social media use
Research Samples and Settings
The Research Sample
Want to be able to draw conclusions that will apply to a larger group of people than the participants they actually study
Population (29): entire group about which the investigator wants to draw conclusions
Sample (29): the subset of the population chosen by the investigator for study
Sample studied must be representative of the population to which the investigator wants to generalize the results
Random sample (30): sample that gives every member of the population an equal chance of being selected
Provides much better grounds for generalizing the results to a population than a nonrandom sample
Random selection improves the chances that the sample is representative of the population
Must strive to minimize bias, including gender bias, and include more people from diverse ethnic groups
The Research Setting
Common settings include the research laboratory and natural settings
Conduct in lab mainly, a controlled setting with many of the complex factors of the real world (potential confounds) removed
Impossible to conduct research in the lab without the participants knowing they are being studies
Lab setting is not the real world, and therefore can cause the participants to behave unnaturally
People willing to go to a university lab may not be representative of groups from diverse cultural backgrounds
Some aspects of the mind and behavior are difficult to examine in the lab
Naturalistic Observation (32): observing behavior in a real world setting (Jane Goodall with chimpanzees)
Conducting Ethical Research
Ethics Guidelines
Notion that a person participating in a psychological research should be no worse off coming out of the study than they was on the way in
Institutional Review Board: evaluates the ethical nature of research conducted at their institutions
American Psychological Association developed ethics guidelines for its members
Instructs psychologists to protect their participants from mental and physical harm - participants bests interests need to be kept foremost in the researcher;s mind
Guidelines addresses:
Informed Consent: all participants must know what their participation will involve and what risks might development
Even after informed consent is given, participants must retain the right to withdraw from the study at any given time and for any reason
Confidentiality: researchers must be responsible for keeping all data they gather on individuals completely confidential and anonymous
Debriefing: researchers should inform participants of its purpose and methods they used after study has been completed
Deception: telling the participants beforehand what the research study is about substantially alters the participants behavior and invalidates the data
Federal Office for Protection from Research Risks: devoted to safeguarding well-being of participants in research studies
Vulnerable populations: children, people with psychological disorders, incarcerated individuals
The Ethics of Research with Animals
Psychotherapy techniques and behavioral medicine
Rehabilitation of neuromuscular disorders
Alleviation of the effects of stress and pain
Drugs to treat anxiety and severe mental illness
Methods for avoiding drug addiction and relapse
Treatments to help premature infants gain weight so they can leave the hospital sooner
Methods used to alleviate memory deficits in old age
Researchers are guided by set of standards for housing, feeding, maintaining the psychological and physical well beijing of animal subjects
The Place of Values in Psychological Research
Question asked not only about ethics of psychology but also its values/standards for judging what is worthwhile and desirable
Learning About Psychology Means Learning About You
Encountering Psychology in Everyday Life
Avoid overgeneralizing based on little information: media reports often leave out details of nature of sample (gender, number, ethnic representation)
Distinguish between groups results and individual needs: cannot apply conclusions from a group to an individual
Look for answers beyond single study: safer to assume that no single study will provide conclusive answers to an important question, especially answers that apply to all people
Avoid attributing causes where none have been found: drawing causal conclusions from correlational studies is common mistake
Consider the source of psychological information: studies conducted by psychologists are not automatically accepted by the rest of the research community
Appreciating Psychology as the Science of You
Psychology has come to recognize more and more that the mind and its operations are intricately connected to body
Nature vs nurture: psychologists have wondered which of the two is more important
Nature (genetic heritage) or nurture (social experience)
The influence of genetics on a variety of psychological characteristics and the ways that genetic influence can itself be altered by experience is important
FIG 1.
FIG 2.