Lesson 8: Fallacies
FALLACIES: Methods of Philosophizing
LOGIC
Branch of philosophy that focuses on the analysis of arguments
Studies and elaborates on good argumentation.
Study of correct thinking and reasoning
FALLACY
Group of statements that appear to be arguments, but fail to support the conclusion.
(e.g.: There is no hope in the Philippine government because the Philippines is a tropical country.)
Argumentum ad Hominem (“Attacking the Person”)
Hominem came from the Latin word “homo” which means man.
This fallacy literally means hitting the person below the belt instead of focusing on the issue at hand. Attacking the person presenting the argument instead of the argument itself.
EXAMPLES:
“How can we believe him when he talks about social distancing, he is a lawyer who is a liar.”
“Of course, he believes that the government is flawed, he is a rebel and a Communist!”
Argumentum ad Baculum (Appeal to Force)
Baculum is a Latin word which means scepter or stick.
A scepter is a symbol of authority. Normally it is the Pope who carries it in his hands. This is committed when a person uses threat or force to advance an argument.
Using the threat of force or an undesirable event to advance an argument.
EXAMPLES:
“TV Patrol is the best news program on TV. If you don’t believe me, I won’t let you watch the TV.”
“If this peace agreement will not be signed by the government, then we will have no recourse but to go to war.”
Argumentum ad misericordiam (Appeal to Pity)
Misericordia came from the Latin word Misericordia which means pity or compassion.
A person uses emotion such as pity to convince someone using emotions such as pity or sympathy.
EXAMPLES:
“Forgive me, officer, there are a lot of boarders in this apartment including myself. Only the owner was issued a quarantine pass. We don’t have food we can’t give our ATM to the owner.
That’s why I went out. So I did not violate the Bayanihan act Heal as One.
“All these charges are baseless; this is just plain harassment- can’t you see how this affects my family?”
Argumentum ad Populum (“Appeal to people”/ Bandwagon fallacy)
Populum is the Latin word for people.
Most TV commercials are guilty of this argument which exploits people’s vanity, desires, etc. The idea is presented as acceptable because a lot of people accept it.
EXAMPLES:
“I’m sure you want to have an iPhone. Almost 80% of your schoolmates are using it.”
“Every boy at your age already has a girlfriend, you should go find one!”
Argumentum ad Tradition/ Antiquitatem (Appeal to Tradition)
Traditio means tradition.
Advancing an idea since it has been practiced for a long time.
The idea is acceptable because it has been true for a long time. “This is the way it has always been done”.
EXAMPLES:
“All of us in the family, from our ancestors up to now, are devout Catholics, so it is only right that you will be baptized as a Catholic.“
“Marriage should be between a man and a woman. It has been so for a long time in this country; it should remain so today and in the future.”
Argumentum ad Ignorantiam (Appeal to Ignorance)
Ignorantiam is a Latin word for ignorance.
Whatever has been proven false must be true and vice versa.
Committed when a person could not give a counterargument or if he/she could not present any evidence or witnesses to prove or disprove the statement of another, his/ her assertions are correct and the opponent is wrong.
EXAMPLES:
“According to Zecharia Sitchin, the author of the book Cosmic Code, Adam was the first test tube baby. Since nobody proves otherwise, therefore it is true.”
“I am sure that the students have understood the instructions perfectly well because no one raised a hand to ask anything of them.”
Petitio Principii (Begging the Question)
A fallacy in which a conclusion is taken for granted in the premise.
Assuming the thing or idea to be proven is true. Also known as “circular argument”
EXAMPLES:
“I have the right to free speech, therefore you cannot stop me from talking.”
“What is a declarative sentence? It is a sentence that declares.”
“Cheating is wrong because it is immoral”
Hasty Generalization
This fallacy is committed when one reaches a generalization based on insufficient evidence.
EXAMPLES:
“Our neighbor who is a police officer was convicted of being a drug dealer, therefore, all police officers are drug dealers. “
Cause-and-effect
Assuming that the effect is related to a cause because both events occur one after the other.
Assuming a “cause-and-effect relationship between unrelated events.
EXAMPLES:
“Ever since you bought that sweater, everything has been going wrong in your life. You should get rid of it.”
“Jen comes to class just as the bell rings every day. Jen’s arrival at class causes the bell to ring.”
“She became an old maid because she used to sing while cooking.”
Fallacy of Composition
Infers that something is true of a part, is true of a whole.
Assuming that what is true of a part is true for the whole.
Individual to all
EXAMPLES:
“You are a doctor, therefore you came from a family of doctors.”
“These cases of robbery in this district have convinced me that the city has become a den of thieves and criminals”
Fallacy of Division
Infers that something is true of the whole, must also be true on its parts.
Assuming that what is true for the whole is true for its parts.
All to individual
EXAMPLES:
“Your family is smart, therefore you are smart.”
“You come from a family of doctors and intellectuals! Surely you can do better in this course!”
Fallacy of Equivocation
Using the same term in a different situation with a different meaning.
Calling two different things by the same name.
Resulting from the use of a particular word/ expression in multiple senses throughout an agreement leading to a false conclusion.
EXAMPLES:
“Humans walk by their legs. The table has legs. Therefore the table walks by its legs.”
“A ruler measures 12 inches, Mayor Isko Moreno is a ruler; therefore, Mayor Isko is 12 inches.”
Fallacy of Accident
Occurs when one attempts to apply a general rule to an irrelevant situation.
EXAMPLES:
Cutting people with knives is a crime.
Surgeons cut people with knives.
Surgeons are criminals.
Argumentum ad Verecundiam (Argument from Authority)
Committed when a person uses a name of a popular celebrity or name of an expert to put more weight in the assertion being made.
EXAMPLES:
“My assignment in Philosophy is not wrong. Ms. Aguirre, my English Academic teacher who is known internationally as a novelist, confirmed my answer.”
False Dichotomy
Seen in the dilemma of the two main political families in the Philippines: the Aquinos and the Marcoses.
This is not to differentiate the two but to present the third most often used fallacy: the false dichotomy.
The false dichotomy is when you’re asked to take sides on only two objects but you really have other options to choose from.
Doesn’t accept the concept of neutrality, but rather adopts the concept of binary.
EXAMPLES:
The dichotomy of Marcos vs Aquino’s family
Red Herring
When a person talks about oranges, rebuts it, however in the form of supporting the bananas.
Diverting the topic and making an argument for it
EXAMPLES:
“#NeverAgain!” “Eh kumusta naman ang Hacienda Luisita?”
FALLACIES: Methods of Philosophizing
LOGIC
Branch of philosophy that focuses on the analysis of arguments
Studies and elaborates on good argumentation.
Study of correct thinking and reasoning
FALLACY
Group of statements that appear to be arguments, but fail to support the conclusion.
(e.g.: There is no hope in the Philippine government because the Philippines is a tropical country.)
Argumentum ad Hominem (“Attacking the Person”)
Hominem came from the Latin word “homo” which means man.
This fallacy literally means hitting the person below the belt instead of focusing on the issue at hand. Attacking the person presenting the argument instead of the argument itself.
EXAMPLES:
“How can we believe him when he talks about social distancing, he is a lawyer who is a liar.”
“Of course, he believes that the government is flawed, he is a rebel and a Communist!”
Argumentum ad Baculum (Appeal to Force)
Baculum is a Latin word which means scepter or stick.
A scepter is a symbol of authority. Normally it is the Pope who carries it in his hands. This is committed when a person uses threat or force to advance an argument.
Using the threat of force or an undesirable event to advance an argument.
EXAMPLES:
“TV Patrol is the best news program on TV. If you don’t believe me, I won’t let you watch the TV.”
“If this peace agreement will not be signed by the government, then we will have no recourse but to go to war.”
Argumentum ad misericordiam (Appeal to Pity)
Misericordia came from the Latin word Misericordia which means pity or compassion.
A person uses emotion such as pity to convince someone using emotions such as pity or sympathy.
EXAMPLES:
“Forgive me, officer, there are a lot of boarders in this apartment including myself. Only the owner was issued a quarantine pass. We don’t have food we can’t give our ATM to the owner.
That’s why I went out. So I did not violate the Bayanihan act Heal as One.
“All these charges are baseless; this is just plain harassment- can’t you see how this affects my family?”
Argumentum ad Populum (“Appeal to people”/ Bandwagon fallacy)
Populum is the Latin word for people.
Most TV commercials are guilty of this argument which exploits people’s vanity, desires, etc. The idea is presented as acceptable because a lot of people accept it.
EXAMPLES:
“I’m sure you want to have an iPhone. Almost 80% of your schoolmates are using it.”
“Every boy at your age already has a girlfriend, you should go find one!”
Argumentum ad Tradition/ Antiquitatem (Appeal to Tradition)
Traditio means tradition.
Advancing an idea since it has been practiced for a long time.
The idea is acceptable because it has been true for a long time. “This is the way it has always been done”.
EXAMPLES:
“All of us in the family, from our ancestors up to now, are devout Catholics, so it is only right that you will be baptized as a Catholic.“
“Marriage should be between a man and a woman. It has been so for a long time in this country; it should remain so today and in the future.”
Argumentum ad Ignorantiam (Appeal to Ignorance)
Ignorantiam is a Latin word for ignorance.
Whatever has been proven false must be true and vice versa.
Committed when a person could not give a counterargument or if he/she could not present any evidence or witnesses to prove or disprove the statement of another, his/ her assertions are correct and the opponent is wrong.
EXAMPLES:
“According to Zecharia Sitchin, the author of the book Cosmic Code, Adam was the first test tube baby. Since nobody proves otherwise, therefore it is true.”
“I am sure that the students have understood the instructions perfectly well because no one raised a hand to ask anything of them.”
Petitio Principii (Begging the Question)
A fallacy in which a conclusion is taken for granted in the premise.
Assuming the thing or idea to be proven is true. Also known as “circular argument”
EXAMPLES:
“I have the right to free speech, therefore you cannot stop me from talking.”
“What is a declarative sentence? It is a sentence that declares.”
“Cheating is wrong because it is immoral”
Hasty Generalization
This fallacy is committed when one reaches a generalization based on insufficient evidence.
EXAMPLES:
“Our neighbor who is a police officer was convicted of being a drug dealer, therefore, all police officers are drug dealers. “
Cause-and-effect
Assuming that the effect is related to a cause because both events occur one after the other.
Assuming a “cause-and-effect relationship between unrelated events.
EXAMPLES:
“Ever since you bought that sweater, everything has been going wrong in your life. You should get rid of it.”
“Jen comes to class just as the bell rings every day. Jen’s arrival at class causes the bell to ring.”
“She became an old maid because she used to sing while cooking.”
Fallacy of Composition
Infers that something is true of a part, is true of a whole.
Assuming that what is true of a part is true for the whole.
Individual to all
EXAMPLES:
“You are a doctor, therefore you came from a family of doctors.”
“These cases of robbery in this district have convinced me that the city has become a den of thieves and criminals”
Fallacy of Division
Infers that something is true of the whole, must also be true on its parts.
Assuming that what is true for the whole is true for its parts.
All to individual
EXAMPLES:
“Your family is smart, therefore you are smart.”
“You come from a family of doctors and intellectuals! Surely you can do better in this course!”
Fallacy of Equivocation
Using the same term in a different situation with a different meaning.
Calling two different things by the same name.
Resulting from the use of a particular word/ expression in multiple senses throughout an agreement leading to a false conclusion.
EXAMPLES:
“Humans walk by their legs. The table has legs. Therefore the table walks by its legs.”
“A ruler measures 12 inches, Mayor Isko Moreno is a ruler; therefore, Mayor Isko is 12 inches.”
Fallacy of Accident
Occurs when one attempts to apply a general rule to an irrelevant situation.
EXAMPLES:
Cutting people with knives is a crime.
Surgeons cut people with knives.
Surgeons are criminals.
Argumentum ad Verecundiam (Argument from Authority)
Committed when a person uses a name of a popular celebrity or name of an expert to put more weight in the assertion being made.
EXAMPLES:
“My assignment in Philosophy is not wrong. Ms. Aguirre, my English Academic teacher who is known internationally as a novelist, confirmed my answer.”
False Dichotomy
Seen in the dilemma of the two main political families in the Philippines: the Aquinos and the Marcoses.
This is not to differentiate the two but to present the third most often used fallacy: the false dichotomy.
The false dichotomy is when you’re asked to take sides on only two objects but you really have other options to choose from.
Doesn’t accept the concept of neutrality, but rather adopts the concept of binary.
EXAMPLES:
The dichotomy of Marcos vs Aquino’s family
Red Herring
When a person talks about oranges, rebuts it, however in the form of supporting the bananas.
Diverting the topic and making an argument for it
EXAMPLES:
“#NeverAgain!” “Eh kumusta naman ang Hacienda Luisita?”