Explanation: Empiricism is the practice of gaining knowledge through direct observation and experimentation rather than through personal intuition or reasoning alone. It emphasizes evidence-based conclusions.
Questions:
How does empiricism differ from rationalism in knowledge acquisition?
Why is empiricism considered fundamental to the scientific method?
Explanation:
Basic research aims to expand knowledge without immediate practical applications.
Applied research focuses on solving real-world problems.
Translational research bridges basic and applied research by using findings from basic research to develop practical applications.
Questions:
What is an example of translational research in psychology?
How does applied research differ from basic research in terms of its goals?
Explanation:
An empirical research article includes sections such as:
Abstract: Summary of the study
Introduction: Background and hypothesis
Method: Details of study design
Results: Data and statistical findings
Discussion: Interpretation and implications
Questions:
What is the purpose of the method section in an empirical research article?
How does the discussion section differ from the results section?
Explanation: Personal experiences are biased, and intuition is prone to errors such as confirmation bias and the availability heuristic. This can lead to incorrect conclusions.
Questions:
What is an example of a cognitive bias that affects intuition?
Why is scientific evidence more reliable than personal experience?
Explanation:
Frequency claims describe how often something occurs.
Association claims indicate relationships between variables.
Causal claims suggest one variable causes changes in another.
Questions:
What type of research design is required to support a causal claim?
How does an association claim differ from a frequency claim?
Explanation:
Conceptual definitions describe a concept in theoretical terms.
Operational definitions specify how a concept is measured or manipulated in a study.
Questions:
Why is an operational definition necessary in research?
How would you operationally define "happiness" in a psychological study?
Would you like me to continue this for the remaining chapters?
4o
yes do all the chapters including 8
ChatGPT said:
Here are the remaining notecard-style explanations and questions for Chapters 4-8 from your study guide.
Explanation: The Belmont Report outlines ethical principles for human research:
Respect for Persons – Individuals must give informed consent.
Beneficence – Researchers must minimize harm and maximize benefits.
Justice – The benefits and risks of research should be distributed fairly.
Questions:
How does the principle of justice protect research participants?
Why is informed consent crucial for ethical research?
Explanation: Covers ethical guidelines for research, including:
Institutional Review Board (IRB): Reviews studies for ethical soundness.
Informed Consent: Participants must voluntarily agree to research.
Deception and Debriefing: Deception must be justified, and debriefing must occur.
Data Fabrication & Falsification: Misrepresentation of research data is unethical.
Questions:
How does deception in research relate to ethical considerations?
What is the role of the IRB in research approval?
Explanation:
Tuskegee Study – African American men with syphilis were misled and denied treatment.
Milgram Study – Participants were pressured to administer shocks to others, testing obedience to authority.
Both studies raised ethical concerns about informed consent and participant well-being.
Questions:
How did the Tuskegee Study violate the Belmont principles?
What ethical concerns did the Milgram study highlight regarding authority and obedience?
Explanation:
Test-retest reliability: Consistency over time.
Internal consistency: Consistency within a test.
Interrater reliability: Agreement between different raters.
Questions:
How is test-retest reliability measured in research?
Why is interrater reliability important in observational studies?
Explanation: The extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure. Includes:
Subjective validity: Face validity, content validity.
Empirical validity: Criterion validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity.
Questions:
How does convergent validity differ from discriminant validity?
Why is construct validity important in psychological measurement?
Explanation:
Double-barreled questions: Ask two things at once.
Leading questions: Influence responses.
Negatively-worded questions: Confuse respondents.
Questions:
Why are double-barreled questions problematic in surveys?
How can leading questions introduce bias in survey research?
Explanation:
Response sets: Patterns of answering without careful consideration.
Social desirability bias: Respondents answer in ways that make them look good.
Questions:
What strategies can researchers use to reduce social desirability bias?
How do response sets affect construct validity?
Explanation: Studies behavior by observing without direct interaction. Includes:
Behavioral observation, content analysis, archival research.
Challenges: Observer bias, observer effects, reactivity.
Questions:
How does observer bias differ from observer effects?
What strategies can minimize reactivity in observational research?
Explanation:
Probability sampling (random selection): Increases external validity.
Nonprobability sampling (non-random selection): Often used for convenience but may limit generalizability.
Questions:
How does stratified random sampling differ from cluster sampling?
Why is random sampling more important for external validity than sample size?
Explanation:
Random sampling: Ensures a representative population.
Random assignment: Used in experiments to create equivalent groups.
Questions:
Why is random assignment crucial for internal validity in experiments?
How does convenience sampling impact external validity?
Explanation: The Pearson r measures the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables (-1.0 to +1.0).
Questions:
How does restriction of range affect correlation strength?
What is an example of a negative correlation?
Explanation:
Statistical significance means a result is unlikely due to chance.
Effect size (r): Measures strength of a relationship.
Questions:
What does a 95% confidence interval tell us about statistical significance?
Why does a larger sample size improve precision in statistical estimates?
Explanation:
Internal validity: Whether a study establishes a cause-effect relationship.
External validity: Generalizability of findings.
Questions:
How do third-variable problems threaten internal validity?
Why is external validity less important in laboratory experiments?
Explanation:
Moderator variables influence the strength of a relationship between two variables.
Third variables create a spurious association between two unrelated variables.
Questions:
How do moderators impact correlation analysis?
What research design can help rule out third-variable problems?