The following notes summarize the key concepts covered in Property Law Lecture 3 at the Institute of Law Jersey, providing a comprehensive understanding of property law's principles and frameworks.
Understanding key definitions and concepts in property law.
Explaining the nature of 'overreaching' and its implications.
Understanding the operation of land charges registration systems.
Analyzing the simplification of conveyancing through the 1925 reforms.
Evaluating the enforceability of third-party rights against purchasers of unregistered land.
There are two main systems of property title in England and Wales: registered and unregistered.
Ownership is demonstrated through the Land Registry, where each qualifying estate is assigned a unique title number.
The register includes details such as ownership and any interests that affect the land.
Transfer of ownership requires the new owner to register as the proprietor.
Unregistered land refers to parcels of land not recorded in the official register.
Ownership is proven through title deeds, which trace ownership history.
Legal framework under the LPA 1925, s52(1), dictates that a freehold estate is only transferable by deed.
Title deeds illustrate the 'root of title' and can contain interests that affect ownership.
Unregistered land often includes a mechanism for protecting certain interests through the Land Charges Register, a vast majority of current titles are now registered, reflecting a gradual reduction in unregistered titles.
To prove ownership, one must consult the title deeds.
Both the registered and unregistered systems address third-party rights but follow different rules.
The aim of distinguishing these systems is to simplify conveyancing processes.
Prior to the 1925 reforms, legal titles required a deed for transfer.
Title deeds served as proof of ownership and provided information about third-party rights, which might bind a purchaser.
Legal rights are universally binding on all purchasers regardless of their knowledge of these rights.
Equitable rights are only binding unless a purchaser learned of them through actual notice, constructive notice, or imputed notice.
In 1920, John granted a legal easement to Sarah and an equitable easement to Jack.
In 1922, when John sold the land to Sally, questions would arise regarding the binding nature of these easements on Sally.
The complex nature of title deeds made ownership difficult to ascertain, potentially impacting purchasers adversely.
The reforms aimed to streamline the conveyancing process and provide clearer terms related to ownership.
The LPA 1925 introduced new legal estates: Fee simple absolute (freehold) and Term of years absolute (leasehold).
It established a more robust system for registering third-party rights, facilitated by the Land Registration Act 1925.
The unregistered title regime benefitted from the overall reforms, maintaining a need to track title history but with simplified requirements.
Third-party interests continue to present challenges, and thus the system of overreaching was introduced to convert equitable rights into monetary shares upon sale.
Overreaching applies primarily to equitable interests, facilitating the sale of land without cumbersome checks for familial or trust-related rights.
The intention is to promote the free exchange of property.
The system does not apply to grantees of easements, and transactions must be conducted in good faith.
The purchaser's diligence in uncovering existing rights on a property directly affects their liability.
Notable cases illustrate how physical occupation and prior dealings hold significance in establishing notice and rights.
The need for extensive searches increases complexity, especially regarding multiple estate owners over time.
Some equitable interests remain unprotected unless formally registered, creating potential pitfalls for purchasers.
These notes provide an in-depth exploration of property law principles, focusing on both theoretical and practical implications, particularly in the context of the 1925 reforms.