Anthropological conceptualization of the self emphasizes the role of culture in forming individual identity.
Instructor: Ms. Janine Paula B. Oñate.
Anthropology studies how cultural and biological processes shape human experiences.
Distinction between nature (genetic inheritance) and nurture (sociocultural environment).
Both biological and cultural factors influence self-development significantly.
Edward Tylor defined culture as a complex whole, including knowledge, beliefs, arts, morals, laws, customs, and habits acquired by individuals in society.
Culture is not defined as behavior, but rather as the shared understandings that shape and guide behavior.
Culture allows individuals to make sense of experiences and behaviors based on social ideas and values.
Provides patterns for ways of life.
Cultural diversity results in varying meanings of self and identity across different cultures.
Sokefeld suggests that the concept of self is essential alongside culture, viewing both as complementary and universal concepts in anthropology.
Identity frequently discussed in terms of ethnic identity, highlighting the similarities shared within a group.
Defined as a disposition of personality features that are primarily acquired in childhood and tend to become fixed.
James Peacock describes individuals as cultural entities, influenced by societal molds while retaining personal freedom.
Egocentric View: Self as autonomous, distinct, replicating humanity while acting independently.
Sociocentric View: Self as dependent on social context, with identity shaped by social interactions.
The Japanese prioritize social group membership, defining self through social connections.
In contrast, the Chinese emphasize kin ties and cooperation, valuing compliance and subordination to family authority.
In egocentric societies like America, individuals focus on autonomy and uniqueness, valuing assertiveness and independence.
Kiefer notes that Japanese self-concept is sociocentric, prioritizing interdependence over independence within social groups.
Hsu's view highlights mutual dependence in interpersonal relations, where compliance to family authority overshadows self-reliance.
The identity toolbox refers to features people choose to highlight in building their social self, including kinship, gender, and age.
Family membership is a crucial determinant of social identity.
Language is a critical marker of group identity, along with religion in some cultures.
Personal naming establishes social identity and membership within a group, being inseparable from self-concept.
Personal names are vital identifiers and cultural markers, differentiating individuals within their communities.
The absence of a name equates to the absence of self.
Arnold van Gennep outlines a three-phase rite of passage: separation, liminality, and incorporation, marking identity transitions.
Separation: Detachment from old identity.
Liminality: Transition between identities.
Incorporation: Official acknowledgment of the new identity.
Anthony Wallace and Raymond Fogelson discuss "identity struggles," where discrepancies exist between claimed identities and those ascribed by others.
Clash between self-identification and collective identities can lead to confusion, exacerbated by cultural changes and conflicting norms.
Sociopolitical factors can complicate identity and moral principles.
Golubovic emphasizes overcoming societal norms for personal self-identification.
Cognitive anthropologists point to the need for multicultural individuals to internalize conflicting cultural models.
Ewing illustrates that individual selves are continuously reconstituted by internal and external factors, suggesting continuity of self is an illusion.
The postmodern individual seeks to understand and define themselves, resonating with the Socratic principle of "know thyself."
Geertz reformulated culture as a symbolic system, where inherited conceptions are expressed through symbols to communicate and understand life.
Humans create meanings from their experiences and act based on shared meanings, leading to cultural distinctions.
Geertz argues that culture should be seen beyond behavior patterns, as a set of mechanisms controlling behavior.
Humans require cultural frameworks for behavior guidance, highlighting interdependence of human nature and culture – no culture, no humanity.