Unit 3 - Linkage Institutions
how the government is related to each other and how the people are related to the government - the medium is the policy
this includes media, interest groups, elections and campaigns
or on the other side you have legislative congress, executive president, and judicial court
Political Parties
a group of citizens who organize to
win elections → hold public offices → operate the government → determine the public policy
the party that has the most control in the gov then you can drive the policy making nature
more demo seats → more demo value policy
more repub seats → more repub value policy
democrat and republican are labels
bc we have a federal form of government → national, state, and local level of organization
there is a chairperson at each level → decentralizes leadership → hard for the party organization to stay strong
there is not a lot of cohesion in each of the parties between the levels of organization
the party in the gov includes the party’s candidates and the office holders
Functions of a Party
recruit and nominate candidates for public office
look at governors and the senate
senate is more likely to be picked for a candidate then the house bc the senate is elected by the whole state
run political campaigns
articulates positions on issues
what republicans feel about controversial issues
ex. global warming
critiquing the policies of the party in power
the party that does not have a president in power looks at what the current party in power and citizens what they did wrong in order to use that to convince people to vote for them the next year
serving as a linkage institution that connects citizens to running for office
providing info to voters about candidates
mobilizing voters to elect party candidates
raising funds to support party candidates
Two - party system
a political system where there are 2 major parties who compete for control of the pubic offices
there could still be minor or smaller parties who will run for office → will not win
reasons why we have a 2 party system
strong consensus on core values
freedom, political equality, equality under the law, individualism
most Americans are moderates and hold beliefs that fall between liberal and conservative and the two parties hold the same core valued but he means to achieve those core values are different
single member district: only one candidate is elected to each office on the ballot
plurality system - prioritize the two main parties - and the candidate who gets the most votes wins
this makes it almost impossible for the smaller parties to win → a 2 party system
legal barriers for a 3rd party
3rd party candidates have to petition in every single state to put their name on the ballot
major parties are already on the ballot
since the 1800s
Party Eras
historical periods that are dominated by one party
1860 - 1928
critical election
national crisis forces voters to confront divisive issues that fracture party coalitions
significant groups of voters change their traditional patterns of loyalty
civil war
party realignment
triggered by a critical election
the majority party is displaced by the minority part → ushering in a new party era
FDR and the New Deal Coalition
the great depression ended the era of republican dominance
FDR is trying to revive the democratic platform → slogan: relief, recovery, reform
the new deal coalition - support to beat the wealthy industrialists
urban dwellers - has been a supporter of the republican party but is now democrat
labor unions
Catholics and jews
southerners
African Americans - has been a supporter of the republican party but is now democrat
it excluded northern business leaders and the wealthy industrialists
this is an example of realignment
Divided government 1968
Nixon election also marked a new era of divided gov
republican president with congress dominated by democrats
the trend continues: one party controls the white house and the other controls congress
Consequences of Having Divided Gov
harder to come to a compromise and negotiate on terms
slowed confirmation and the legislative process → gridlock
ex. highway 400 rush hour: potential to get to where you want to go but nothing is moving
increased public frustration with gov → declining in trust and confidence in gov
decline in the percentage of voters who identify with a party and the rise of independent voters
increase of split ticket voting
period of party delegation
Decentralized nature of Political Parties
both of the major parties are highly decentralized and fragmented
why?
the party out of power usually lacks a strong leader or obvious leader
the federal system distributes power widely → decentralized power in gov and in political powers
the nominating process can pit party members against one another → whoever wins will have to be supported by the same people who was against them → fragmented party
Types of minor parties
parties dominated by charismatic leaders
Theodore Roosevelt’s bull Moore party organized around progressive ideas
George Wallace American independent party expressed southern backlash against civil rights legislation urban riots and antiwar protests
ross Perot’s campaign
parties organized around a single issue - usually avoid other issues
free soil part - opposed the spread of slavery
the know nothing - opposed Irish Catholics immigrants
the right to life party - opposed to abortion
parties organized around a ideology - profess a comprehensive view of society that is radically different from the established parties
the socialist party supported labor unions and advocated laws to regulate big business
the libertarian party emphasizes individualism and reduction of gov programs
Obstacles to Minor Party Candidates
the winner take all format of the electoral
the most popular votes in the state gets the all the electoral votes
ex. Ross Perot won 19% of the popular vote but did not get a single electoral vote
single member districts make it difficult to win seats in congress
3rd party candidates - exclusion from the presidential debates
Importance and Impact of Minor Parties
express strong views on controversial issues
major parties usually make issues black and white in order to maintain followers and supporters
often push major parties to adopt their ideas → makes the minor party more irrelevant
minor parties can play the “spoiler” role of affecting the outcome of the election
ross Perot - independent party - pulled support away from Geore HW Bush in 1992 allowing Clinton to win
Ralph Nader - green party - pulled away from the Al Gore in 2000 allowing George W Bush to win
The Administrations of Elections
elections are primarily regulated by the State law, but there are some overreaching federal regulations
congress has the power to set the time, place, and manner of congressional and presidential elections
congress has chosen the first Tuesdays after the first Monday in November of every even numbered year for the congressional elections with the presidential election being held the same day every 4th year
states determine the details of the election of thousands of state and local officials
most states provide for absentee voting for voters who are unable to get to their regular polling places on election day
some states within the last few years have started to allow voting a few days before the election to increase voter participation
History of the Ballot
voting was done orally in the beginning - it was considered “manly” to speak out your vote without fear of reprisal
paper ballots began to be used in the mid-1800s
people would provide their own ballots → political machines took advantage of the flexibility of the process to intimidate, buy or manufacture votes
in the late 1800s, ballot reforms cleaned up ballet fraud by supplying standardized , accurate ballots and mandating that voting be secret
Election Process - the first step
the US there are two steps
nominations - where the field of candidates narrow down
general election - where the voters make the final decision of the who holds office
Presidential Primaries
closed primary - voter are required to identify a party preference before the election and are not allowed to split their ticket
open primary - voter can decide on election day what party they want to participate in
the democratic party has replaced winner take all primaries with a proportional system that awards delegates based on the percentage of votes a candidate receives
the republican party uses both - depends on the state
only about 25% of adult citizens cast votes in primary elections - primary voters tend to be party activists who are older and identify
The Party Conventions
they formally name the party’s presidential and vice pres. candidates
they adopt a party platform
they attempt to unify the party and generate positive publicity and momentum
they kick off the transition from the primary season to the general election season and the candidates strategy changes
Presidential vs congressional campaigns
presidential race
more competitive
winner usually gets less than 55% of the vote
larger voter turnout
still does not mean that it is healthy
must rely on the mass media to reach the voters
have to be able to reach people on a larger scale - all the people
incumbent presidents are often held responsible for whatever has gone wrong
ex. president trump - the covid pandemic - the spike in deaths, the mask/no mask policy, high unemployment rates
congressional race
less competitive
winner usually gets more than 60% of the vote
smaller voter turnout
closer contact with the districts voters
even incumbent congressmen are held responsible for bad decisions made
people tend to be less knowledgably about the congressmen → most congressmen are more likely to get voted for re election just because they were already in office
unless they were on the news for some type of scandal
“run against Washington”
Congressional elections
incumbency advantage - more clear cut for a congress election
during the last 50 years =, incumbency has been the single most important factor in determining the outcome of congressional elections
over 90% of house incumbents seeking reelection wins
over 75% of senate incumbents seeking reelection win
why incumbents win
money
visibility - as long as they have not been in the news for bad choices or illegal things or shown in a bad light → they are more likely to get re elected
constituent service
casework - working to provide a certain group with certain things → leads to more support
pork barrel preservation - creates animosity between Americans because tax dollars on to a specific district for a project in order for that person to get re-elected by that certain district
the franking privilege - free mail - free advertising
gerrymandering - drawing district lines in funky shapes to benefit one party
which every party has control over the government can draw the lines in order to maximize votes during the elections
Consequences of incumbency advantage
more experience in congress → enabling it to maintain continuity of leadership and policy
discourages radical change - lack of consistency while encouraging close relations with interest groups(want to influence policy)
the longer you have people in congress → the stronger the relationship between congress and the interest groups
incumbents benefit most from existing campaign finance laws - they have no incentive to change them
Campaign spending and reform
federal election campaign reform act of 1974
created the FECA - provided partial funding for presidential primaries, provided full public financing for major party candidates in the general election, placed limitations on individual contributions to the candidates
Buckley vs Valeo
Soft Money (gets banned) - unregulated donations to political parties- building activities - this is used to circumvent the hard money limitations in campaign finance
The Bipartisan Campaign reform act 2002
eliminated soft money contributions
527 groups
tax exempt organizations created to influence the political process
not regulated by the FECA
spend hundreds of millions of dollars on political messages
Electoral College
was created because they thought that the citizens were not smart enough to know what they want - safeguard from the direct popular vote election
each state has as many electoral votes as its combines total representative and senators
California has 55
electors were originally chosen by the state legislatures - today they are selected by the parties
the framers intended the electors to be independent but now they are expected to vote for their party’s candidates for president and vp
it takes 270 electoral votes to win the presidency - if that number is not reached the house of reps decides the election
Consequences of Winner take all electoral college
in all the states but two, the president who gets the most votes gets all the states electoral votes
candidates devote a disproportionate amount of time and resources to closely contested states known as swing states
candidates emphasize issues that many swing a key block of voters in a pivotal state
the winner take all system severely limits the 3rd party candidates
sometimes a candidate will win the popular vote but not the electoral vote
Reasons why the electoral college as not been abolished
it would require a constitutional amendment to abolish the electoral college
it collectively benefits the small stats that are guaranteed at least 3 electoral votes
the electoral college benefits facial minorities and interest groups located in key states
there is no consensus on how to reform the electoral college
What decides the elections
the party has the main priority
issues(economically)
prospective voting and retrospective voting
the campaign
finding a winning coalition
Linking Citizens to Gov
an organization where people whose members share the same policy views on specific issues and attempt to influence public policy
a social club is different bc an interest group actively tries to influence public policy
interest groups operate at every level of gov expr4esses their members preferences to policy makers
can be labeled as a faction by the gov
interest groups convey gov policy info to their members
they raise and spend money to influence policy makers
this is not bribe
there are specific ethic rules that have to be followed
Key Differences between Political Parties and interest groups
political parties - nominate candidates, contest elections, and seek to gain control over gov
they seek to win → to gain seats → to gain control over congress and gov
have positions on every single potential issue and current issues that are out there
they have to make polices that keep the greatest number of people happy
interest groups - seek to influence people who are already in seats or in congress
focus on specific issues that directly affect their members - they become experts on the policies but on very few policies
they are only accountable for the interests of their members not the vast majority of society
Types of interest groups
business groups
Chamber of Commerce
labor groups
American Federation of Labor
agricultural groups
Farm Bureau
professional associations
National education association
environmental groups
The Sierra Club
public interest groups
League of Woman voters
equality interest groups
NAACP
single issue groups
Planned Parenthood
Interest groups goals
lobbying - the process by which interest groups attempt to influence the decisions of policy makers
lobby courts
lobby congress
lobby the executive branch
friend of the court brief - an individual or group that has nothing to do with the case but is permitted to assist the court by offering information or filing a brief that has a bearing of the issues in the individual or groups favor
gain access to policy makers
influence public policy
support sympathetic policy makers
supply credible information
policy experts - they have to give good correct info → can support from policy makers that trust your info
Contributing money to candidates
if you want to give money directly to a candidate you must create a PAC
PAC - political action committee formed by business, labor, or other interest groups to raise money and make contributions to the campaign
PAC can contribute up $5000 per candidate per election
there are more than $5000 PACs - they play a significant part in supporting incumbent members
Sharing Public Opinion
interest groups spend a lot of money on public relation campaigns to bring an issue to the public attention
they use ads to promote their image as good citizens who protect the environment and care about the communities
they may engage in
interest groups may provide incentives to people to join their groups
solidarity - a solution to feeling alone in your beliefs
material
purposive - allows you to feel like you are actively making a change in the political world
Mass Media
a medium of communication
entertainment
the ratings are keys to success
news reports
political news has been published since the late 18th century (the federalist)
the role of gatekeeper
news stations filter through all the stories that they have been aware of choose to report it - we are not made aware of absolutely everything
the role of score keeper
similar to horse race - reporting on polling results
watchdog
watching for certain thing that can be reported and told to the public - a major check on the national gov on what they are doing wrong
creation of political forums
politicians use the mass media to promote their careers and draw attention to their issues
the president has direct access to the media and this is able to use it to help set the policy agenda
linkage institutions - how this connects us to the gov
connects people to the gov by interviewing citizens, presenting poll results, and covering protests
connects the gov to the people by interviewing political leaders and reporting on gov committees and programs
* the internet and social media are the new ways of campaigning and reporting news and they way the news can be spread
The media and politics
candidate centered campaigns - they seem to be more significant themselves than the party themselves → the candidate can use the internet to campaign for themselves and not have to rely on their party funding
political campaigns have become more focused on the candidate and less focused on the issues
the mass media has contributed to
sound bites that have replaced dialogues and speeches - because no one is going to sit and watch a 40 min long speech
this could also be used to take things out of context and make the opposing candidate look bad
The internet and politics
because of the internet…
potential candidates can now raise money in small donations
organize people to attend meetings - zoom is a great example of the advancements
take instant polls - even though those are unreliable most of the time
instantly criticize you opponent
ex. sound bites
mobilize local followers
Instagram, twitter
target campaigners with the names of people they should contact
Are the National Media Biased
do members of the media have a distinctive political attitude
yes of course - they choose to report certain political issues a certain way or choose not to report them at all
does that attitude affect what they say or write
yes the bias is apparent in their published works or even on TV when they show debates between newscasters on their beliefs on a political candidate, issues, or the president
does what they write or say affect what the citizens believe
no because people tend to watch or read things that support what they already believe rather than delve into the other side of things
Government and News
the news covers the government on different scales
they give the president the most air time because he is more important
then congressional coverage because that is where most of the decision making takes place
there are so many news leaks because the media is testing out how the public will react to that piece of information - whether the reaction is good or bad
sensationalism in the media - adhering to what the people want to see in order to get more air time or reach a high number of viewers and followers
there are government constraints on journalists - some stuff is just on a need to know basis for the public
how the government is related to each other and how the people are related to the government - the medium is the policy
this includes media, interest groups, elections and campaigns
or on the other side you have legislative congress, executive president, and judicial court
Political Parties
a group of citizens who organize to
win elections → hold public offices → operate the government → determine the public policy
the party that has the most control in the gov then you can drive the policy making nature
more demo seats → more demo value policy
more repub seats → more repub value policy
democrat and republican are labels
bc we have a federal form of government → national, state, and local level of organization
there is a chairperson at each level → decentralizes leadership → hard for the party organization to stay strong
there is not a lot of cohesion in each of the parties between the levels of organization
the party in the gov includes the party’s candidates and the office holders
Functions of a Party
recruit and nominate candidates for public office
look at governors and the senate
senate is more likely to be picked for a candidate then the house bc the senate is elected by the whole state
run political campaigns
articulates positions on issues
what republicans feel about controversial issues
ex. global warming
critiquing the policies of the party in power
the party that does not have a president in power looks at what the current party in power and citizens what they did wrong in order to use that to convince people to vote for them the next year
serving as a linkage institution that connects citizens to running for office
providing info to voters about candidates
mobilizing voters to elect party candidates
raising funds to support party candidates
Two - party system
a political system where there are 2 major parties who compete for control of the pubic offices
there could still be minor or smaller parties who will run for office → will not win
reasons why we have a 2 party system
strong consensus on core values
freedom, political equality, equality under the law, individualism
most Americans are moderates and hold beliefs that fall between liberal and conservative and the two parties hold the same core valued but he means to achieve those core values are different
single member district: only one candidate is elected to each office on the ballot
plurality system - prioritize the two main parties - and the candidate who gets the most votes wins
this makes it almost impossible for the smaller parties to win → a 2 party system
legal barriers for a 3rd party
3rd party candidates have to petition in every single state to put their name on the ballot
major parties are already on the ballot
since the 1800s
Party Eras
historical periods that are dominated by one party
1860 - 1928
critical election
national crisis forces voters to confront divisive issues that fracture party coalitions
significant groups of voters change their traditional patterns of loyalty
civil war
party realignment
triggered by a critical election
the majority party is displaced by the minority part → ushering in a new party era
FDR and the New Deal Coalition
the great depression ended the era of republican dominance
FDR is trying to revive the democratic platform → slogan: relief, recovery, reform
the new deal coalition - support to beat the wealthy industrialists
urban dwellers - has been a supporter of the republican party but is now democrat
labor unions
Catholics and jews
southerners
African Americans - has been a supporter of the republican party but is now democrat
it excluded northern business leaders and the wealthy industrialists
this is an example of realignment
Divided government 1968
Nixon election also marked a new era of divided gov
republican president with congress dominated by democrats
the trend continues: one party controls the white house and the other controls congress
Consequences of Having Divided Gov
harder to come to a compromise and negotiate on terms
slowed confirmation and the legislative process → gridlock
ex. highway 400 rush hour: potential to get to where you want to go but nothing is moving
increased public frustration with gov → declining in trust and confidence in gov
decline in the percentage of voters who identify with a party and the rise of independent voters
increase of split ticket voting
period of party delegation
Decentralized nature of Political Parties
both of the major parties are highly decentralized and fragmented
why?
the party out of power usually lacks a strong leader or obvious leader
the federal system distributes power widely → decentralized power in gov and in political powers
the nominating process can pit party members against one another → whoever wins will have to be supported by the same people who was against them → fragmented party
Types of minor parties
parties dominated by charismatic leaders
Theodore Roosevelt’s bull Moore party organized around progressive ideas
George Wallace American independent party expressed southern backlash against civil rights legislation urban riots and antiwar protests
ross Perot’s campaign
parties organized around a single issue - usually avoid other issues
free soil part - opposed the spread of slavery
the know nothing - opposed Irish Catholics immigrants
the right to life party - opposed to abortion
parties organized around a ideology - profess a comprehensive view of society that is radically different from the established parties
the socialist party supported labor unions and advocated laws to regulate big business
the libertarian party emphasizes individualism and reduction of gov programs
Obstacles to Minor Party Candidates
the winner take all format of the electoral
the most popular votes in the state gets the all the electoral votes
ex. Ross Perot won 19% of the popular vote but did not get a single electoral vote
single member districts make it difficult to win seats in congress
3rd party candidates - exclusion from the presidential debates
Importance and Impact of Minor Parties
express strong views on controversial issues
major parties usually make issues black and white in order to maintain followers and supporters
often push major parties to adopt their ideas → makes the minor party more irrelevant
minor parties can play the “spoiler” role of affecting the outcome of the election
ross Perot - independent party - pulled support away from Geore HW Bush in 1992 allowing Clinton to win
Ralph Nader - green party - pulled away from the Al Gore in 2000 allowing George W Bush to win
The Administrations of Elections
elections are primarily regulated by the State law, but there are some overreaching federal regulations
congress has the power to set the time, place, and manner of congressional and presidential elections
congress has chosen the first Tuesdays after the first Monday in November of every even numbered year for the congressional elections with the presidential election being held the same day every 4th year
states determine the details of the election of thousands of state and local officials
most states provide for absentee voting for voters who are unable to get to their regular polling places on election day
some states within the last few years have started to allow voting a few days before the election to increase voter participation
History of the Ballot
voting was done orally in the beginning - it was considered “manly” to speak out your vote without fear of reprisal
paper ballots began to be used in the mid-1800s
people would provide their own ballots → political machines took advantage of the flexibility of the process to intimidate, buy or manufacture votes
in the late 1800s, ballot reforms cleaned up ballet fraud by supplying standardized , accurate ballots and mandating that voting be secret
Election Process - the first step
the US there are two steps
nominations - where the field of candidates narrow down
general election - where the voters make the final decision of the who holds office
Presidential Primaries
closed primary - voter are required to identify a party preference before the election and are not allowed to split their ticket
open primary - voter can decide on election day what party they want to participate in
the democratic party has replaced winner take all primaries with a proportional system that awards delegates based on the percentage of votes a candidate receives
the republican party uses both - depends on the state
only about 25% of adult citizens cast votes in primary elections - primary voters tend to be party activists who are older and identify
The Party Conventions
they formally name the party’s presidential and vice pres. candidates
they adopt a party platform
they attempt to unify the party and generate positive publicity and momentum
they kick off the transition from the primary season to the general election season and the candidates strategy changes
Presidential vs congressional campaigns
presidential race
more competitive
winner usually gets less than 55% of the vote
larger voter turnout
still does not mean that it is healthy
must rely on the mass media to reach the voters
have to be able to reach people on a larger scale - all the people
incumbent presidents are often held responsible for whatever has gone wrong
ex. president trump - the covid pandemic - the spike in deaths, the mask/no mask policy, high unemployment rates
congressional race
less competitive
winner usually gets more than 60% of the vote
smaller voter turnout
closer contact with the districts voters
even incumbent congressmen are held responsible for bad decisions made
people tend to be less knowledgably about the congressmen → most congressmen are more likely to get voted for re election just because they were already in office
unless they were on the news for some type of scandal
“run against Washington”
Congressional elections
incumbency advantage - more clear cut for a congress election
during the last 50 years =, incumbency has been the single most important factor in determining the outcome of congressional elections
over 90% of house incumbents seeking reelection wins
over 75% of senate incumbents seeking reelection win
why incumbents win
money
visibility - as long as they have not been in the news for bad choices or illegal things or shown in a bad light → they are more likely to get re elected
constituent service
casework - working to provide a certain group with certain things → leads to more support
pork barrel preservation - creates animosity between Americans because tax dollars on to a specific district for a project in order for that person to get re-elected by that certain district
the franking privilege - free mail - free advertising
gerrymandering - drawing district lines in funky shapes to benefit one party
which every party has control over the government can draw the lines in order to maximize votes during the elections
Consequences of incumbency advantage
more experience in congress → enabling it to maintain continuity of leadership and policy
discourages radical change - lack of consistency while encouraging close relations with interest groups(want to influence policy)
the longer you have people in congress → the stronger the relationship between congress and the interest groups
incumbents benefit most from existing campaign finance laws - they have no incentive to change them
Campaign spending and reform
federal election campaign reform act of 1974
created the FECA - provided partial funding for presidential primaries, provided full public financing for major party candidates in the general election, placed limitations on individual contributions to the candidates
Buckley vs Valeo
Soft Money (gets banned) - unregulated donations to political parties- building activities - this is used to circumvent the hard money limitations in campaign finance
The Bipartisan Campaign reform act 2002
eliminated soft money contributions
527 groups
tax exempt organizations created to influence the political process
not regulated by the FECA
spend hundreds of millions of dollars on political messages
Electoral College
was created because they thought that the citizens were not smart enough to know what they want - safeguard from the direct popular vote election
each state has as many electoral votes as its combines total representative and senators
California has 55
electors were originally chosen by the state legislatures - today they are selected by the parties
the framers intended the electors to be independent but now they are expected to vote for their party’s candidates for president and vp
it takes 270 electoral votes to win the presidency - if that number is not reached the house of reps decides the election
Consequences of Winner take all electoral college
in all the states but two, the president who gets the most votes gets all the states electoral votes
candidates devote a disproportionate amount of time and resources to closely contested states known as swing states
candidates emphasize issues that many swing a key block of voters in a pivotal state
the winner take all system severely limits the 3rd party candidates
sometimes a candidate will win the popular vote but not the electoral vote
Reasons why the electoral college as not been abolished
it would require a constitutional amendment to abolish the electoral college
it collectively benefits the small stats that are guaranteed at least 3 electoral votes
the electoral college benefits facial minorities and interest groups located in key states
there is no consensus on how to reform the electoral college
What decides the elections
the party has the main priority
issues(economically)
prospective voting and retrospective voting
the campaign
finding a winning coalition
Linking Citizens to Gov
an organization where people whose members share the same policy views on specific issues and attempt to influence public policy
a social club is different bc an interest group actively tries to influence public policy
interest groups operate at every level of gov expr4esses their members preferences to policy makers
can be labeled as a faction by the gov
interest groups convey gov policy info to their members
they raise and spend money to influence policy makers
this is not bribe
there are specific ethic rules that have to be followed
Key Differences between Political Parties and interest groups
political parties - nominate candidates, contest elections, and seek to gain control over gov
they seek to win → to gain seats → to gain control over congress and gov
have positions on every single potential issue and current issues that are out there
they have to make polices that keep the greatest number of people happy
interest groups - seek to influence people who are already in seats or in congress
focus on specific issues that directly affect their members - they become experts on the policies but on very few policies
they are only accountable for the interests of their members not the vast majority of society
Types of interest groups
business groups
Chamber of Commerce
labor groups
American Federation of Labor
agricultural groups
Farm Bureau
professional associations
National education association
environmental groups
The Sierra Club
public interest groups
League of Woman voters
equality interest groups
NAACP
single issue groups
Planned Parenthood
Interest groups goals
lobbying - the process by which interest groups attempt to influence the decisions of policy makers
lobby courts
lobby congress
lobby the executive branch
friend of the court brief - an individual or group that has nothing to do with the case but is permitted to assist the court by offering information or filing a brief that has a bearing of the issues in the individual or groups favor
gain access to policy makers
influence public policy
support sympathetic policy makers
supply credible information
policy experts - they have to give good correct info → can support from policy makers that trust your info
Contributing money to candidates
if you want to give money directly to a candidate you must create a PAC
PAC - political action committee formed by business, labor, or other interest groups to raise money and make contributions to the campaign
PAC can contribute up $5000 per candidate per election
there are more than $5000 PACs - they play a significant part in supporting incumbent members
Sharing Public Opinion
interest groups spend a lot of money on public relation campaigns to bring an issue to the public attention
they use ads to promote their image as good citizens who protect the environment and care about the communities
they may engage in
interest groups may provide incentives to people to join their groups
solidarity - a solution to feeling alone in your beliefs
material
purposive - allows you to feel like you are actively making a change in the political world
Mass Media
a medium of communication
entertainment
the ratings are keys to success
news reports
political news has been published since the late 18th century (the federalist)
the role of gatekeeper
news stations filter through all the stories that they have been aware of choose to report it - we are not made aware of absolutely everything
the role of score keeper
similar to horse race - reporting on polling results
watchdog
watching for certain thing that can be reported and told to the public - a major check on the national gov on what they are doing wrong
creation of political forums
politicians use the mass media to promote their careers and draw attention to their issues
the president has direct access to the media and this is able to use it to help set the policy agenda
linkage institutions - how this connects us to the gov
connects people to the gov by interviewing citizens, presenting poll results, and covering protests
connects the gov to the people by interviewing political leaders and reporting on gov committees and programs
* the internet and social media are the new ways of campaigning and reporting news and they way the news can be spread
The media and politics
candidate centered campaigns - they seem to be more significant themselves than the party themselves → the candidate can use the internet to campaign for themselves and not have to rely on their party funding
political campaigns have become more focused on the candidate and less focused on the issues
the mass media has contributed to
sound bites that have replaced dialogues and speeches - because no one is going to sit and watch a 40 min long speech
this could also be used to take things out of context and make the opposing candidate look bad
The internet and politics
because of the internet…
potential candidates can now raise money in small donations
organize people to attend meetings - zoom is a great example of the advancements
take instant polls - even though those are unreliable most of the time
instantly criticize you opponent
ex. sound bites
mobilize local followers
Instagram, twitter
target campaigners with the names of people they should contact
Are the National Media Biased
do members of the media have a distinctive political attitude
yes of course - they choose to report certain political issues a certain way or choose not to report them at all
does that attitude affect what they say or write
yes the bias is apparent in their published works or even on TV when they show debates between newscasters on their beliefs on a political candidate, issues, or the president
does what they write or say affect what the citizens believe
no because people tend to watch or read things that support what they already believe rather than delve into the other side of things
Government and News
the news covers the government on different scales
they give the president the most air time because he is more important
then congressional coverage because that is where most of the decision making takes place
there are so many news leaks because the media is testing out how the public will react to that piece of information - whether the reaction is good or bad
sensationalism in the media - adhering to what the people want to see in order to get more air time or reach a high number of viewers and followers
there are government constraints on journalists - some stuff is just on a need to know basis for the public