Introduction to New Atheism: A contemporary movement contributing to public understanding of science and philosophy.
Key Works: Triggered by Sam Harris's The End of Faith (2004) and followed by notable figures like Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens, and Victor Stenger.
Context: Emerged post-9/11, reflecting a reaction to religious extremism.
Initial Wave: Immediate successes and books by the founding figures.
Subsequent Authors: Includes Jerry Coyne and P. Z. Myers, who contribute through articles and blogs, but with varied tones.
Diverse Perspectives: While some adhere strictly to New Atheism, others, like Alain De Botton and A. C. Grayling, diverge in tone and arguments.
Scientism Defined: A tendency to treat science as the sole or ultimate authority, often at the expense of philosophy.
Impression of Popularity: New Atheism’s success is unprecedented in terms of global bestsellers—Dawkins’s The God Delusion topped lists for 51 weeks.
Sociological Context: The 9/11 attacks likely influenced the rise and acceptance of New Atheism.
Difference from Classical Atheism: Classical Atheism relied on philosophical arguments; New Atheism leans heavily on scientific authority against religion.
Origins: Traces back to ancient philosophers; the term implies denying gods.
Early Figures: Notable atheists included Diagoras of Melos and poets like Euripides.
Decline During Middle Ages: Atheistic thought diminished significantly until the Renaissance saw a resurgence, heralded by thinkers like Diderot and Hume.
Philosophical Contributions: The 19th and early 20th centuries provided strong defenses against religion through philosophical channels, e.g., Marx and Nietzsche.
Christopher Hitchens: His work focuses on anti-religious rhetoric without grounding in scientific inquiry.
Daniel Dennett: Advocates that religion is a natural phenomenon but aims for a more sophisticated understanding, acknowledging the legitimacy of philosophical inquiry.
Richard Dawkins, Victor Stenger, and Sam Harris: Present a notable shift towards scientism, attempting to frame the existence of gods as a scientific hypothesis rather than philosophical.
Dawkins’s Contributions: Reiterates traditional philosophical arguments against deity and critiques theistic claims through the lens of science, yet often oversimplifies complex philosophical discussions.
Stenger’s Approach: Similar to Dawkins, regards the ‘god hypothesis’ as scientifically testable, despite philosophical nuances.
Harris’s The Moral Landscape: Claims morality can be derived from science, which raises philosophical critiques regarding the role of philosophy in ethics vs. science.
Philosophical Limitations: Scientism extends science’s scope into realms better suited to philosophy, such as morality and existential questions.
Consequences for Science: Misunderstandings of scientific methodology can hurt public perception and undermine nuanced discussions about religion and morality.
Effect on Atheism: Atheism benefits from scientific insights, but building a case solely on science dismisses the well-established philosophical traditions that have expounded on these issues for centuries.
Emphasizes a collaboration between science and philosophy.
Rethinking Knowledge: A broad approach combining scientific rigor with philosophical inquiry, as expressed in the Latin term "scientia," covering all reliable sources of knowledge.
Respect for Disciplines: Modern atheism should integrate various fields to foster a comprehensive understanding of morality and human existence, moving away from the reductionist tendencies of New Atheism.
Pioneering Authors: De Botton and Grayling exemplify a movement towards more nuanced atheism, blending philosophical insights with the relevant adaptations of contemporary thought.