The Uluru Statement from the Heart (2017): A significant moment in Australian political history.
Represents a pan-Aboriginal policy position derived from consensus.
Aims to assert Aboriginal political aspirations framed in terms of reform and accommodation to settler colonial state.
Media control: Aboriginal people had a role in shaping the media narrative, ensuring it reflected their worlds, hopes, and sentiments.
Unique nature of the Uluru Statement: Addressed to the Australian people, rather than government representatives.
Constitutional Recognition:
Definition: Term used to discuss obligations owed to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples by the settler state.
Emerged during Howard government's early years; initial proposal (1999) for a symbolic constitutional preamble failed in referendum.
Post-2010: Continuous commitment by successive governments for constitutional recognition.
Aboriginal political exclusion: Aboriginal people were excluded from the modern nation until the 1967 referendum.
Policy debates over years: Focus on Aboriginal recognition within the nation state, leading to calls for sovereignty and treaties.
Evolution of Aboriginal Affairs Policy (last 50 years):
Two key shifts identified by political scientist Will Sanders (2018):
Adoption of self-determination in the 1970s.
Transition away from statutory authority (ATSIC) post-2005 towards competitive contractualism and welfare reform.
Diminishing Aboriginal input in policy: By 2013, Aboriginal voice reduced to an advisory council handpicked by the Prime Minister.
Constitutional change: Seen by Aboriginal peoples as a strategy to re-establish rightful relations with the Australian state.
Review of historical moments: How governments have engaged with Aboriginal rights.
Renewed momentum after the 2010 Gillard government created the Expert Panel for Aboriginal Recognition in the Constitution.
Panel's mandate: Explore pathways for constitutional change and referendum support.
Final report (2012): Proposed various ways of recognition, including preambles, statements, and anti-discrimination clauses.
Recognise campaign: Launched to increase public awareness and support for a referendum.
Conducted regional dialogues for consensus-driven proposals among Aboriginal people regarding constitutional reform.
Highlights:
Diverse representation of Aboriginal communities included.
Conference culminated in the Uluru Statement: Central reforms articulated as ‘Voice, Treaty, Truth.’
Historical resonance: “In 1967 we were counted, in 2017 we seek to be heard.”
Examination of newspaper articles from major Australian media outlets concerning the Uluru Statement.
Notable Media Responses:
The Australian (AUS1): Initial opposition to proposals from liberal voice, framing constitutional recognition as a mistake.
The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH1): Focus on personal narratives and historical context, showing enduring struggle and the pursuit of recognition for Aboriginal people.
The Daily Telegraph (DT1): Contrasts past successes and ongoing challenges facing Aboriginal communities, framing optimism in future recognition efforts.
Overall, significant variation in how the media portrays Aboriginal voices and aspirations, reflecting broader societal attitudes toward Aboriginal issues.
Media coverage during the Uluru Statement marks a rare opportunity where Aboriginal people effectively shaped discourse.
Coverage varied significantly between outlets:
The Sydney Morning Herald: Emphasizes continuity of Aboriginal presence and identity in Australian society.
The Australian: Affirms reform while adhering to a conservative liberal philosophy; prioritizes existing power structures.
Impact of Uluru Statement on Australian media landscape: Indication of both progress and the challenges that remain in acknowledging Aboriginal political aspirations.