Focus on the effectiveness and limitations of various investigative techniques used in criminal investigations.
Key transitions from crime scene to courtroom.
Crime Scene Management: Properly marked crime scenes are crucial to avoid contamination.
Not Cross Signs: Indicates restricted access to ensure evidence integrity.
Useful Techniques: Assess the value of different methods to solve criminal cases.
Focus on how these methods transition from crime scene analysis to courtroom evidence.
Utility of DNA:
Present in nearly every human cell; unique to individuals facilitating reliable identification.
Solves cold cases and can affirm both guilt and innocence.
Aids in victim identification when no other methods are applicable.
Familial DNA: Similarities observed in DNA from relatives can aid investigations.
Cross-Contamination: Risks of DNA samples being compromised.
National DNA Database Dependence: A match requires profiles to be in the database leading to concerns about civil liberties.
False Implication Risk: Small traces might inaccurately link innocent individuals to crimes.
Cost of Testing: Expense associated with DNA analysis.
Research Task: Investigate the cases of Colette Aram and Anne Marie Foy.
Note the role of forensic evidence, particularly DNA, in each case.
CCTV as a Primary Tool:
Essential for capturing evidence and identifying suspects post-crime.
Particularly effective in urban environments where high volumes of street crime occur.
Covert Surveillance: Utilization of human intelligence to gather information discreetly, involving personal relationships for data collection.
Understanding Offenders: Behavior is often reflective of past actions; prior violence predicts future potential for violence.
General Definition: Compiling known data about a crime scene and victim to construct a potential profile of the unidentified perpetrator (Ainsworth, 2001, p7).
Geographical Profiling: Bottom-up approach that uses location data to suggest potential perpetrators.
Investigative Psychology: Merges offender profiling with databases to derive offender characteristics.
Typological Profiling: Top-down method categorizing offenders as organized or disorganized based on their criminal behavior.
Organised Crime:
Features: Planned, targeted victims, premeditated violence.
Characteristics: Intelligent offenders who retain control, socially adept.
Examples: Robbery, trafficking.
Disorganized Crime:
Features: Impulsive and random acts, lack of planning.
Characteristics: Socially inept offenders; often leave evidence behind.
Example: Case of Jack the Ripper.
Profiles include demographics like age, gender, occupational background, IQ, and familial connections.
Use of profiles aids in connecting suspects to crimes via matching evidence and constructing a solid case for prosecution in court.
Reliability Issues: Many profiles stem from interviews with serial offenders, raising validity concerns.
Overlap of Crime Categories: Some offenders do not fit neatly into organized or disorganized categories.
Scientific Limitations: Profiling may be vague and universally applicable (Barnum Effect).
Definition: The tendency of individuals to accept generic statements as personally relevant.
Common pitfalls in profiling methods due to this phenomenon.
Definition: Testimony provided by individuals who have witnessed a crime, considered highly reliable by juries.
Limitations: Factors such as stress and anxiety can compromise accuracy; skepticism exists regarding EWT under certain conditions.
Role of Experts: Provide specialized knowledge and interpret evidence effectively.
Blood Pattern Analysis: Helps in understanding assault dynamics.
Digital Forensics: Recovery of deleted data including messages and contacts.
Entomology in Investigations: Assists in determining timelines of suspicious deaths.
Key role in gathering, analyzing, and explaining evidence to support criminal investigations, enhancing the overall evidentiary framework in court.