DJ

Memory – Comprehensive Study Notes

Learning Outcomes (LO)

  • LO10.1: Describe memory & outline information-processing model

  • LO10.2: Describe working memory (WM)

  • LO10.3: Outline major long-term-memory (LTM) types

  • LO10.4: Describe how info is encoded & organised in LTM

  • LO10.5: Explain remembering, misremembering & forgetting

Key Introductory Ideas

  • Memory = mental representation permitting information to re-enter mind when stimulus absent

  • Representations:

    • Sensory (visual, auditory, olfactory, etc.)

    • Verbal (word-based)

    • Motoric (stored muscle movements)

  • Standard computer metaphor -> three stores: Sensory Registers, Short-Term Memory (STM), Long-Term Memory (LTM)

Information-Processing / Standard Model

  • Flow: Stimulus -> Sensory Registers -> (attention) STM -> (encoding) LTM -> (retrieval) STM/Consciousness

  • Loss possible at every stage

  • Sensory Registers: last approx 0.5 s (vision), up to 2 s (emotionally laden) - Iconic (visual) & Echoic (auditory)

  • STM: 20-30 s; classic capacity 7 +/- 2 items (Miller, 1956) though modern bandwidth approx 4 or even 1 item when rehearsal/chunking prevented

  • Serial Position Effect: Primacy + Recency curves

  • Evolution of model:

    • Parallel vs serial processing

    • Multiple autonomous modules

    • Inclusion of unconscious/implicit systems

    • Shift of metaphor from “mind=computer” to “mind=brain”

Working Memory (WM)

  • WM = active temporary storage + processing to meet goals

  • Baddeley & Hitch (1974) original tripartite model; later Baddeley (2000,2010) adds episodic buffer

    • Central Executive (limited capacity control system)

    • Visuospatial Sketchpad (visual–spatial store)

    • Phonological/Articulatory Loop (verbal store)

    • Episodic Buffer (temporary multimodal integrator linked to LTM in time-sequence)

  • Storage != Processing; dual-task studies show reasoning slows with high digit load (>3) but errors unchanged -> separate capacities

  • Capacity correlates with fluid intelligence, academic skills, ADHD symptoms

  • Neuroanatomy: Prefrontal Cortex orchestrates; posterior cortices process modality-specific info; distinct loci for object vs location memory

  • Chunking -> uses LTM knowledge to compress STM load (e.g., “ASXBHPASICSMH” into ASX, BHP, ASIC, SMH)

Varieties of Long-Term Memory

  • Declarative (Explicit)

    • Semantic (generic facts)

    • Episodic (autobiographical events)

  • Procedural (Implicit/Skill)

  • Explicit vs Implicit retrieval dimension (recall, recognition vs behavioural expression, priming)

  • Everyday Memory: functional, goal-directed, meaningful; includes prospective memory (PM) – remembering to remember

    • PM types: Event-based vs Time-based cues

    • PM declines unevenly with age; aids = external reminders, exercise, mnemonic strategies

Encoding Mechanisms

  • Encoding = creating retrievable code

  • Levels of Processing (Craik & Lockhart 1972): Structural -> Phonemic -> Semantic (deep)

  • Encoding Specificity Principle: retrieval best when context/mode matches encoding (environmental, state-dependent, mood-dependent)

  • Spacing Effect: distributed rehearsal (e.g., 56-day intervals > 14-day) doubles 5-year retention

  • Multimodal coding improves access; more cues

Mnemonic Devices & Study Strategies

  • Method of Loci: place vivid images along familiar route

  • SQ4R for textbooks: Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review, Write

  • External aids (lists, alarms); internal strategies (chunking, elaboration)

Organisation of LTM

  • Networks of Association: nodes interconnected; strength varies; spreading activation (Collins & Quillian 1969)

    • Recently/frequently activated nodes possess higher baseline activation

  • Hierarchical organisation: categories -> subcategories -> features (e.g., Animal -> Bird -> Canary)

  • Schemas: organised knowledge structures with default values; guide encoding & reconstruction; culturally shaped

    • Can cause memory distortions (office schema experiment; typo “to to” overlooked)

Remembering, Misremembering & Forgetting

  • Schacter’s “7 Sins”: transience, absentmindedness, misattribution, suggestibility, bias, persistence, blocking/forgetting

  • Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve: rapid initial loss then asymptote; mathematically logarithmic M(t) = M_0 e^(-kt)

  • Causes:

    • Decay: fading synaptic traces

    • Interference: Proactive & Retroactive

    • Motivated Forgetting: goal-directed suppression (directed forgetting studies, Wegner’s thought suppression)

  • Flashbulb Memories: vivid but not always accurate; dependent on adrenal arousal; propranolol blocks enhancement

  • Eyewitness Testimony vulnerabilities: wording effects (“a” vs “the”), schemas, social cues; child & adult differential accuracy

  • False vs Repressed Memories debate: laboratory implantation possible (approx 15%-25%); genuine abuse memories often fragmented; need balanced clinical/legal approach

Memory Across the Lifespan

  • Infantile Amnesia (<2–4 yrs): linked to hippocampal neurogenesis disrupting consolidation

  • Childhood elaborative parent discussions predict richer autobiographical recall later

  • Ageing: Normal decline in episodic & WM; semantic & procedural relatively spared; exercise-induced neurogenesis can mitigate

Neurological Bases & Amnesia

  • Medial Temporal Lobe (hippocampus) critical for consolidation of explicit memories

  • Frontal Lobes: WM/executive, episodic temporal tagging

  • Basal Ganglia + Cerebellum: procedural skills

  • Anterograde Amnesia: cannot form new LT explicit memories (e.g., H.M. post-bilateral MTL removal) but retains implicit learning

  • Retrograde Amnesia: loss of pre-injury memories (tumours, strokes, ECT)

  • Alzheimer’s: severe anterograde + graded retrograde; procedural spared early, priming variable

  • Huntington’s: impaired procedural, intact priming

Ethical, Philosophical & Practical Implications

  • Eyewitness reliability affects justice; interview wording must avoid leading questions

  • Therapy: recovered memories require corroboration; clinicians must avoid suggestion

  • Education: spaced repetition, deep processing, multimodal cues improve durable learning; cumulative exams beneficial

  • Cultural Relevance: mnemonics in oral cultures (e.g., Indigenous songlines) underline interplay between memory & environment

Landmark Experiments & Figures

  • Ebbinghaus (1885): nonsense syllables, forgetting curve

  • Sperling (1960): sensory iconic memory grid & tone

  • Miller (1956): 7 +/- 2 capacity limit

  • Baddeley & Hitch (1974); Baddeley (2000): WM model

  • Bahrick et al. (1993): spaced language learning 5-yr retention

  • Brewer & Treyens (1981): office schema false recall

  • Loftus & Palmer (1974): wording effect on eyewitness speed estimates

  • Cahill et al. (1994): propranolol & emotional memory

  • Maguire et al. (1997,2000): London taxi drivers’ hippocampi

Selected Numerical/Statistical References

  • Iconic storage duration: 0.5-2 s

  • STM duration: 20-30 s without rehearsal

  • Digit span: 5-9 items (classic) ; newer models approx 4

  • Bahrick spacing: 13 sessions at 56-day intervals > 26 sessions at 14-day

  • False-memory implantation rates approx 15%-25% over 2-3 interviews

  • Grade recall study: 71% correct; 80% inflated; 6% deflated

Quick Glossary (abridged)

  • STM/WM: temporary conscious store/processor

  • Episodic vs Semantic: event vs factual knowledge

  • Procedural: “how-to” skills

  • Priming: implicit facilitation via prior exposure

  • Encoding Specificity: retrieval success depends on match with encoding context

  • Prospective Memory: remembering future intentions

  • Chunking: grouping to expand WM capacity

  • Anterograde/Retrograde Amnesia: post-/pre-injury memory loss

Study Tips Derived from Research

  • Employ spaced rehearsal: review material over days/weeks

  • Mix modalities: read, speak, draw, act

  • Create elaborate, meaningful associations; link to prior knowledge

  • Use mnemonics (method of loci, acronyms, narratives)

  • Test yourself frequently (retrieval practice boosts consolidation)

  • Align study context with assessment conditions when possible