Memory – Comprehensive Study Notes
Learning Outcomes (LO)
LO10.1: Describe memory & outline information-processing model
LO10.2: Describe working memory (WM)
LO10.3: Outline major long-term-memory (LTM) types
LO10.4: Describe how info is encoded & organised in LTM
LO10.5: Explain remembering, misremembering & forgetting
Key Introductory Ideas
Memory = mental representation permitting information to re-enter mind when stimulus absent
Representations:
Sensory (visual, auditory, olfactory, etc.)
Verbal (word-based)
Motoric (stored muscle movements)
Standard computer metaphor -> three stores: Sensory Registers, Short-Term Memory (STM), Long-Term Memory (LTM)
Information-Processing / Standard Model
Flow: Stimulus -> Sensory Registers -> (attention) STM -> (encoding) LTM -> (retrieval) STM/Consciousness
Loss possible at every stage
Sensory Registers: last approx 0.5 s (vision), up to 2 s (emotionally laden) - Iconic (visual) & Echoic (auditory)
STM: 20-30 s; classic capacity 7 +/- 2 items (Miller, 1956) though modern bandwidth approx 4 or even 1 item when rehearsal/chunking prevented
Serial Position Effect: Primacy + Recency curves
Evolution of model:
Parallel vs serial processing
Multiple autonomous modules
Inclusion of unconscious/implicit systems
Shift of metaphor from “mind=computer” to “mind=brain”
Working Memory (WM)
WM = active temporary storage + processing to meet goals
Baddeley & Hitch (1974) original tripartite model; later Baddeley (2000,2010) adds episodic buffer
Central Executive (limited capacity control system)
Visuospatial Sketchpad (visual–spatial store)
Phonological/Articulatory Loop (verbal store)
Episodic Buffer (temporary multimodal integrator linked to LTM in time-sequence)
Storage != Processing; dual-task studies show reasoning slows with high digit load (>3) but errors unchanged -> separate capacities
Capacity correlates with fluid intelligence, academic skills, ADHD symptoms
Neuroanatomy: Prefrontal Cortex orchestrates; posterior cortices process modality-specific info; distinct loci for object vs location memory
Chunking -> uses LTM knowledge to compress STM load (e.g., “ASXBHPASICSMH” into ASX, BHP, ASIC, SMH)
Varieties of Long-Term Memory
Declarative (Explicit)
Semantic (generic facts)
Episodic (autobiographical events)
Procedural (Implicit/Skill)
Explicit vs Implicit retrieval dimension (recall, recognition vs behavioural expression, priming)
Everyday Memory: functional, goal-directed, meaningful; includes prospective memory (PM) – remembering to remember
PM types: Event-based vs Time-based cues
PM declines unevenly with age; aids = external reminders, exercise, mnemonic strategies
Encoding Mechanisms
Encoding = creating retrievable code
Levels of Processing (Craik & Lockhart 1972): Structural -> Phonemic -> Semantic (deep)
Encoding Specificity Principle: retrieval best when context/mode matches encoding (environmental, state-dependent, mood-dependent)
Spacing Effect: distributed rehearsal (e.g., 56-day intervals > 14-day) doubles 5-year retention
Multimodal coding improves access; more cues
Mnemonic Devices & Study Strategies
Method of Loci: place vivid images along familiar route
SQ4R for textbooks: Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review, Write
External aids (lists, alarms); internal strategies (chunking, elaboration)
Organisation of LTM
Networks of Association: nodes interconnected; strength varies; spreading activation (Collins & Quillian 1969)
Recently/frequently activated nodes possess higher baseline activation
Hierarchical organisation: categories -> subcategories -> features (e.g., Animal -> Bird -> Canary)
Schemas: organised knowledge structures with default values; guide encoding & reconstruction; culturally shaped
Can cause memory distortions (office schema experiment; typo “to to” overlooked)
Remembering, Misremembering & Forgetting
Schacter’s “7 Sins”: transience, absentmindedness, misattribution, suggestibility, bias, persistence, blocking/forgetting
Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve: rapid initial loss then asymptote; mathematically logarithmic M(t) = M_0 e^(-kt)
Causes:
Decay: fading synaptic traces
Interference: Proactive & Retroactive
Motivated Forgetting: goal-directed suppression (directed forgetting studies, Wegner’s thought suppression)
Flashbulb Memories: vivid but not always accurate; dependent on adrenal arousal; propranolol blocks enhancement
Eyewitness Testimony vulnerabilities: wording effects (“a” vs “the”), schemas, social cues; child & adult differential accuracy
False vs Repressed Memories debate: laboratory implantation possible (approx 15%-25%); genuine abuse memories often fragmented; need balanced clinical/legal approach
Memory Across the Lifespan
Infantile Amnesia (<2–4 yrs): linked to hippocampal neurogenesis disrupting consolidation
Childhood elaborative parent discussions predict richer autobiographical recall later
Ageing: Normal decline in episodic & WM; semantic & procedural relatively spared; exercise-induced neurogenesis can mitigate
Neurological Bases & Amnesia
Medial Temporal Lobe (hippocampus) critical for consolidation of explicit memories
Frontal Lobes: WM/executive, episodic temporal tagging
Basal Ganglia + Cerebellum: procedural skills
Anterograde Amnesia: cannot form new LT explicit memories (e.g., H.M. post-bilateral MTL removal) but retains implicit learning
Retrograde Amnesia: loss of pre-injury memories (tumours, strokes, ECT)
Alzheimer’s: severe anterograde + graded retrograde; procedural spared early, priming variable
Huntington’s: impaired procedural, intact priming
Ethical, Philosophical & Practical Implications
Eyewitness reliability affects justice; interview wording must avoid leading questions
Therapy: recovered memories require corroboration; clinicians must avoid suggestion
Education: spaced repetition, deep processing, multimodal cues improve durable learning; cumulative exams beneficial
Cultural Relevance: mnemonics in oral cultures (e.g., Indigenous songlines) underline interplay between memory & environment
Landmark Experiments & Figures
Ebbinghaus (1885): nonsense syllables, forgetting curve
Sperling (1960): sensory iconic memory grid & tone
Miller (1956): 7 +/- 2 capacity limit
Baddeley & Hitch (1974); Baddeley (2000): WM model
Bahrick et al. (1993): spaced language learning 5-yr retention
Brewer & Treyens (1981): office schema false recall
Loftus & Palmer (1974): wording effect on eyewitness speed estimates
Cahill et al. (1994): propranolol & emotional memory
Maguire et al. (1997,2000): London taxi drivers’ hippocampi
Selected Numerical/Statistical References
Iconic storage duration: 0.5-2 s
STM duration: 20-30 s without rehearsal
Digit span: 5-9 items (classic) ; newer models approx 4
Bahrick spacing: 13 sessions at 56-day intervals > 26 sessions at 14-day
False-memory implantation rates approx 15%-25% over 2-3 interviews
Grade recall study: 71% correct; 80% inflated; 6% deflated
Quick Glossary (abridged)
STM/WM: temporary conscious store/processor
Episodic vs Semantic: event vs factual knowledge
Procedural: “how-to” skills
Priming: implicit facilitation via prior exposure
Encoding Specificity: retrieval success depends on match with encoding context
Prospective Memory: remembering future intentions
Chunking: grouping to expand WM capacity
Anterograde/Retrograde Amnesia: post-/pre-injury memory loss
Study Tips Derived from Research
Employ spaced rehearsal: review material over days/weeks
Mix modalities: read, speak, draw, act
Create elaborate, meaningful associations; link to prior knowledge
Use mnemonics (method of loci, acronyms, narratives)
Test yourself frequently (retrieval practice boosts consolidation)
Align study context with assessment conditions when possible