Water - ENSP 101 - Exam #2 Content
Discovery of significant excess nutrient pollution
Excess nutrients led to large algae blooms and depleted oxygen levels
Depleted oxygen levels are called hypoxia and create “dead-zones”
Causes decline in aquatic life and overall health of the bay
Eutrophication: When a body of water acquires a high concentration of nutrients promoting excessive algae growth
Excess nutrients come from many sources
Runoff from agriculture
Rainwater runoff in urban areas
Soil erosion
Animal waste
Sewage
etc.
There were decades of using common water resources as sewers, such as the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
The concept of limiting resources suggests that among all aspects of an organism’s habitat, there is one resource needed for growth that is most important because it is most limited
Nitrogen and Phosphorus are possible limiting resources
When not in short supply, we get algae blooms
Interactions between the Lithosphere and the Hydrosphere
Average of 10x as much soil erodes from American agriculture as is replaced.
Primary losses are surface soils, which contain most of the bio-available nutrients and minerals needed to sustain plant life
Subsoils less productive, less permeable, lower water-holding capacity (More prone to runoff)
Sediment
The shallowing of water bodies from sedimentation is a natural process
When it happens too quickly, water temperatures dramatically increase
Higher temps grow more algae
Sediments can also carry nutrients
Now called the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement
Multistate agreement with the EPA
Does many things
Establishment of Chesapeake Bay Executive Council
Chesapeake Bay Program
EPA Liasion
Revised with current updates many times
Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act
First state to sign agreement and to enact state laws
Goals
Reduce nutrients
Protect areas with intrinsic water quality value
Require localities to establish local programs related to protection and improvement of the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Areas
Regulations followed in 1990, establishing the guidelines for stormwater management on development sites
Defined important resources (“intrinsic water quality value”) as Resource Protection Areas (RPA) and Resource Management Areas (RMA)
Tidal wetlands; Non-tidal wetlands connected by surface flow and contiguous to tidal wetlands or water bodies with perennial flow; Tidal shores
A buffer area not less than 100 feet in width located adjacent to and landward of the components listed above, and along both sides of any water body with perennial flow.
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
For several decades, retention ponds have been the solution to stormwater
Blowout can occur from too much water and will cause tons of nutrients and sediment to be re-released into the system.
Adding 100ft buffer to perennial streams is a possible solution as well
Surface runoff
More water = faster water
Soil erosion
There has not been much of a change in nutrient inputs
Obama asked for more funding and goals into Chesapeake Bay programs
Established “Watershed Implementation Plans” and “Total Maximum Daily Loads”
New types of BMPs - Softer engineering solutions for stormwater management
Regenerative step pool conveyance
Living shorelines
Low impact development
Grass-lined infiltration basin
Clean up seems to be beginning to be more successful
In a watershed Water runs downhill and takes nutrients and solids through erosion
Water pollution: Contamination of water by human activities
About 80% of all industrial and domestic wastewater on a global level is released into water resources without prior treatment
Causes
Agriculture: Uses up to 70% of the world’s surface water
Industrial Waste: Makes water unfit for drinking, domestic use, and animal use
Chemical Runoff: Occurs when there is more water than land can absorb
Plastic Waste: Major contributor to global water crisis
Oil Spills: Oil spills from ships and tankers pollute the seawater and create a thick sludge
Deforestation: Exhaust water resources and create a breeding ground for bacteria
Bioaccumulation: Increase in concentration of a pollutant in an organism
Biomagnification: Increase in concentration of a pollutant in a food chain
Mercury increases up the food chain
Contaminants have occurred in the reproductive organs of some orcas
EPA study from 2015 found no negative effects of fracking on drinking water
Red tides: Excessive algae blooms that negatively impact other organisms
Ocean Acidification
Depletion of aquifers
Global distribution of available water is very heterogeneous
⅓ of land surface is “dry lands”
Adapting to this uneven distribution
Underground water supplies
Divert water
Impound surface water (dams)
Problems causing water scarcity
Overuse
High water withdrawals in USA, China, India
USA has very high freshwater use per capita
USA does not have a very high renewable freshwater resources per capita
Pollution
Many of our water sources have excess nutrients caused by fertilzers and agricultural runoff
Access
The richest 20% almost always has very good access to water, while the bottom 20% does
The US exports a lot of resources that have water in them or involved a lot of water use
Water like soil and other natural resources in the West has historically been developed under a distinctive legal regime that defies natural limitations on growth and conservation concerns
Because of scarcity, water rights in the West are hotly contested among many compelling user groups, but compromise is possible
Water conflicts often map on to social and cultural divisions that are expressed in arguments about which group is the most legitimate beneficiary of the resource
Gifford Pinchot - “Conservation is the greatest good for the greatest number for the longest time.”
Said that residents should be “grouped to the greatest extent possible”
“The right to use water should inhere in the land to be irrigated, and water rights should go with land titles”
Powell said that states should be bounded to create watersheds rather than creating square states.
The gold rush not only involved claiming gold, but also claiming water to get to the gold
Requires sharing of water by all landowners along a water course
No landowner can substantially diminish the flow of water to other users
Exporting water from the stream is prohibited or strongly discouraged
“First in time, first in right” (first user gets guaranteed supply in times of shortage
No requirement to share water or conserve any stream - first claimant could even potentially use it all
Users may divert and transport water far from source - even into a different watershed
Upheld by California Supreme Court in Irwin vs. Phillips (1855)
Soon adopted by other western states, sometimes in combination with riparian law to make a hybrid law system that recognizes riparian rights to “reasonable use” of some water by landowners
Expanded and refined by subsequent laws and court decisions
Diversion necessary to obtain rights
Water must be put to a beneficial use (commercial and extractive, not in-stream uses)
States govern water rights
“It was the policy of the government, it was the desire of the Indians, to change [their nomadic and uncivilized] habits and to become a pastoral and civilized people…”
Tribal rights established as of the date that the federal government created a given reservation. Tribes almost always possess seniority rights to those of most other current users
Tribal rights cannot be forfeited by non-use, unlike rights held under state law according to the principle of “prior appropriation”
Although the scope of these rights is sometimes quantified as the amount of water necessary to support the practically irrigable acreage on a reservation, once quantified, tribal water can be used for non-agricultural purposes
Tribal rights involve future needs, not just present reservation needs
Improvement of Nature
The National Reclamation (Newlands) Act of 1902 authorized the Secretary of the Interior to designate irrigation sites and to establish a reclamation fund from the sale of public lands to finance irrigation projects
Construction/maintenance costs were to be repaid through land sales and water charges to farmers on these projects. There is now an indefinite time that the farmers have to repay the costs. Many farmers have not paid it back because they just don’t have the steady income to do so.
By the 1920s, Reclamation Act had brought 9.2 million acres of land under cultivation in 17 western states
According to one study done in the 1980s, about 86% of the costs for construction and maintenance had not been repaid
In the American West, agriculture still uses around 86% of fresh water in the desert
By 1904, Los Angeles had a population of around 200,000 and needed a larger water supply to continue growing
In 1905, William Mulholland and Los Angeles Mayor Fred Eaton began purchasing land and water rights in the Owens Valley, initially by leading sellers to believe that they were cattle ranchers or agents of the Bureau of Reclamation
Los Angeles grew from this with Mulholland as a hero for replacing a failed agricultural region with a growing, successful city
Divided Colorado River into upper basin (CO, NM, UT, WY) and lower basin (AZ, CA, NV)
Article III apportioned waters between Upper and Lower basins as follows
Both basins have perpetual right to “exclusive beneficial consumptive use” of 7.5 million acre-feet annually (15 million a-f total)
Lower Basin (with larger population) gets additional 1 million acre feet
Upper Basin cannot cause the river’s flow to fall below 75 million acre feet for any period of ten consecutive years
Upper basin states will not withhold water, and Lower Basin states will not demand water that cannot reasonably be applied to domestic and agricultural uses
Mexico would receive water pursuant to treaty, but only from surplus allocated to states; if surplus is insufficient, then Upper and Lower basins will share the burden of supplying Mexico’s apportionment (now 1.5 million a-f)
EC LaRue’s Water Supply Paper 395 (1916) estimated the Colorado’s average annual flow from 1895 to 1915 to be 16.2 million acre-feet
In 1934, the federal government began the Parker Dam construction project to divert Colorado River water to southern California. Arizona responded by mobilizing its National Guard and deploying the “Arizona Navy” (two ferry boats) to patrol the river.
Secretary of Interior Harold Ickes was only able to resume construction after promising Arizona a federal irrigation project of its own
Pollution is a collective action problem
Top US water polluters are mostly chemical companies
Cost incurred by a party who did not agree to the action causing the cost
Social costs to human health, environment
Pollution is the largest environmental threat to human health
Largest greenhouse gas polluters are large corporations
Point sources of water pollution
Factories
Wastewater treatment plant
Non-point sources of water pollution
Urban streets
Suburban development
Rural homes
Cropland
Animal feedlot
Employs various regulatory and non-regulatory tools to sharply reduce direct pollutant discharges into waterways, establish ambient water quality standards, finance municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
Regulates the discharge of pollutants into waters of the US
Point Source: CWA made it illegal to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waterways without a permit
Non-point source: CWA addressed pollutants from a non-point source through non regulatory means
Total maximum daily load to keep a water body meeting quality standards
TMDL = Sum of wasteload allocations (point sources) + sum of load allocations (nonpoint sources) + margin of safety
Traditionally navigable waterways
Interstate waters
Territorial seas
Impoundments of water
Tributary waters
Adjacent waters
Waters within the 100 year flood plain of traditional waterways, interstate waters, and territorial seas
Waters within 4000 feet of high tide line or ordinary high water mark of traditional waterways, interstate waters, or territorial seas
Redefined to “only those relatively permanent, standing, or continuously flowing”
Established minimum standards to protect tap water and requires all owners of public water systems to comply with these primary standards
Solving Water Pollution Problems
Precautionary Principle: if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus that the action or policy is not harmful, the burden of proof that is not
Internalize costs
Indigenous opposition to water/energy development projects must be understood in the broader context of Native American History and federal Indian policy - as sovereignty disputes and cultural issues as well as environmental problems. Climate change is a major concern but not the only concern.
Historically, indigenous nations have disproportionately absorbed many of the negative externalities created by American economic and energy development
Indigenous peoples can form, and have formed, coalitions with environmental groups and other local opponents of water/energy projects, but their interests are not necessarily identical. These coalitions are often fractious and ephemeral
Green energy development and sustainability should be measured by cultural and social metrics as well as economic and environmental metrics. Environmental justice is an important measure of whether a project is truly green
Water is power
The Dakota Access Pipeline was planned to go through Indigenous lands.
Many Indigenous people fought back in an attempt to prevent the pipeline from successfully being installed
They were worried about oil leaks getting into their waterways.
Lakota Indigenous People
Treaty of Fort Laramie established the Great Sioux Reservation encompassing the western half of South Dakota including black hills
Discovery of gold in the Black Hills caused pressure to cede additional lands in 1876 treaty
Land cessions in 1889 splintered reservation even farther
Lakotas fought against the US, lost
Pick Sloan Plan - built dams on Reservations for…
Flood Control
Navigation
Irrigation
Power Supply
Water Supply
Water Quality
Recreation
Fish and Wildlife
Oahe Dam
Flooded more than 160000 acres of tribal land and destroyed 90% of timberland on the Standing Rock Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux reservations, as well as the best rangeland, most cultivated areas, and the wild plant and game habitat
Aggravated poverty on reservations
DAPL went under Lake Oahe, so permit from Army Corps of Engineers necessary
Standing Rock
Protests against pipeline
Police brutality as a result of the protests
Sacred Foods of the Waasat Religion
Water, Salmon, Berries, Roots, Deer
Longhouse feasts begin and end with an invocation of Chuush followed by a sip of water because water is life
Many dams flooded Indigenous fisheries and village sites in the Columbia-Snake Basin and blocked upriver fish passage entirely
Pumped storage projects allow the banking of electricity generated by dams, windmills, and solar farms to supplement the grid when renewables cannot meet demand. Basically they are large batteries
Pushpum: Sacred site for Yakama Nation Ceremonies, Legends, and gathering of traditional roots and medicines
FERC…
Failed to consult with Yakama Nation
Failed to protect sensitive cultural information
Failed to assess alternatives (ie. locations)
Ignored the development’s large consumption of Columbia River water and impacts to fish, wildlife, streams, and wetlands
Look for the positives and recognize, celebrate, and build on incremental progress and accomplishments
We must value, protect, and manage what we have while also committing to resolve the problems
The rivers no longer burn
76% of wastewater received some level of treatment (42% of population)
60% of total wastewater safely treated (12% of population)
Reporting on Industrial Wastewater
Only 38% was treated
Only 27% was safely treated
Reporting on Household Wastewater
42% not safely treated before discharge
We now treat water in newer treatment systems instead of leaving it untreated in outhouses
Legal requirements, technological developments, incentives
Flint Water Crisis
Many people worked for a resolution
Government eventually stepped in to help
Access to water
We can recharge aquifers by understanding how water filters through soils
We can recharge aquifers also by using injection wells that add water back to the groundwater when not needed and pulling it out when needed.
Desalinization techniques allow access to ocean water as freshwater
Klamath River Dam
Used solely for power generation, not agriculture
Removal does not affect water rights
Provided electricity to 70000 households when active
Removal allows fish, allowing water quality
Original reservoirs provided recreation and tax revenue
Discovery of significant excess nutrient pollution
Excess nutrients led to large algae blooms and depleted oxygen levels
Depleted oxygen levels are called hypoxia and create “dead-zones”
Causes decline in aquatic life and overall health of the bay
Eutrophication: When a body of water acquires a high concentration of nutrients promoting excessive algae growth
Excess nutrients come from many sources
Runoff from agriculture
Rainwater runoff in urban areas
Soil erosion
Animal waste
Sewage
etc.
There were decades of using common water resources as sewers, such as the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
The concept of limiting resources suggests that among all aspects of an organism’s habitat, there is one resource needed for growth that is most important because it is most limited
Nitrogen and Phosphorus are possible limiting resources
When not in short supply, we get algae blooms
Interactions between the Lithosphere and the Hydrosphere
Average of 10x as much soil erodes from American agriculture as is replaced.
Primary losses are surface soils, which contain most of the bio-available nutrients and minerals needed to sustain plant life
Subsoils less productive, less permeable, lower water-holding capacity (More prone to runoff)
Sediment
The shallowing of water bodies from sedimentation is a natural process
When it happens too quickly, water temperatures dramatically increase
Higher temps grow more algae
Sediments can also carry nutrients
Now called the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement
Multistate agreement with the EPA
Does many things
Establishment of Chesapeake Bay Executive Council
Chesapeake Bay Program
EPA Liasion
Revised with current updates many times
Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act
First state to sign agreement and to enact state laws
Goals
Reduce nutrients
Protect areas with intrinsic water quality value
Require localities to establish local programs related to protection and improvement of the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Areas
Regulations followed in 1990, establishing the guidelines for stormwater management on development sites
Defined important resources (“intrinsic water quality value”) as Resource Protection Areas (RPA) and Resource Management Areas (RMA)
Tidal wetlands; Non-tidal wetlands connected by surface flow and contiguous to tidal wetlands or water bodies with perennial flow; Tidal shores
A buffer area not less than 100 feet in width located adjacent to and landward of the components listed above, and along both sides of any water body with perennial flow.
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
For several decades, retention ponds have been the solution to stormwater
Blowout can occur from too much water and will cause tons of nutrients and sediment to be re-released into the system.
Adding 100ft buffer to perennial streams is a possible solution as well
Surface runoff
More water = faster water
Soil erosion
There has not been much of a change in nutrient inputs
Obama asked for more funding and goals into Chesapeake Bay programs
Established “Watershed Implementation Plans” and “Total Maximum Daily Loads”
New types of BMPs - Softer engineering solutions for stormwater management
Regenerative step pool conveyance
Living shorelines
Low impact development
Grass-lined infiltration basin
Clean up seems to be beginning to be more successful
In a watershed Water runs downhill and takes nutrients and solids through erosion
Water pollution: Contamination of water by human activities
About 80% of all industrial and domestic wastewater on a global level is released into water resources without prior treatment
Causes
Agriculture: Uses up to 70% of the world’s surface water
Industrial Waste: Makes water unfit for drinking, domestic use, and animal use
Chemical Runoff: Occurs when there is more water than land can absorb
Plastic Waste: Major contributor to global water crisis
Oil Spills: Oil spills from ships and tankers pollute the seawater and create a thick sludge
Deforestation: Exhaust water resources and create a breeding ground for bacteria
Bioaccumulation: Increase in concentration of a pollutant in an organism
Biomagnification: Increase in concentration of a pollutant in a food chain
Mercury increases up the food chain
Contaminants have occurred in the reproductive organs of some orcas
EPA study from 2015 found no negative effects of fracking on drinking water
Red tides: Excessive algae blooms that negatively impact other organisms
Ocean Acidification
Depletion of aquifers
Global distribution of available water is very heterogeneous
⅓ of land surface is “dry lands”
Adapting to this uneven distribution
Underground water supplies
Divert water
Impound surface water (dams)
Problems causing water scarcity
Overuse
High water withdrawals in USA, China, India
USA has very high freshwater use per capita
USA does not have a very high renewable freshwater resources per capita
Pollution
Many of our water sources have excess nutrients caused by fertilzers and agricultural runoff
Access
The richest 20% almost always has very good access to water, while the bottom 20% does
The US exports a lot of resources that have water in them or involved a lot of water use
Water like soil and other natural resources in the West has historically been developed under a distinctive legal regime that defies natural limitations on growth and conservation concerns
Because of scarcity, water rights in the West are hotly contested among many compelling user groups, but compromise is possible
Water conflicts often map on to social and cultural divisions that are expressed in arguments about which group is the most legitimate beneficiary of the resource
Gifford Pinchot - “Conservation is the greatest good for the greatest number for the longest time.”
Said that residents should be “grouped to the greatest extent possible”
“The right to use water should inhere in the land to be irrigated, and water rights should go with land titles”
Powell said that states should be bounded to create watersheds rather than creating square states.
The gold rush not only involved claiming gold, but also claiming water to get to the gold
Requires sharing of water by all landowners along a water course
No landowner can substantially diminish the flow of water to other users
Exporting water from the stream is prohibited or strongly discouraged
“First in time, first in right” (first user gets guaranteed supply in times of shortage
No requirement to share water or conserve any stream - first claimant could even potentially use it all
Users may divert and transport water far from source - even into a different watershed
Upheld by California Supreme Court in Irwin vs. Phillips (1855)
Soon adopted by other western states, sometimes in combination with riparian law to make a hybrid law system that recognizes riparian rights to “reasonable use” of some water by landowners
Expanded and refined by subsequent laws and court decisions
Diversion necessary to obtain rights
Water must be put to a beneficial use (commercial and extractive, not in-stream uses)
States govern water rights
“It was the policy of the government, it was the desire of the Indians, to change [their nomadic and uncivilized] habits and to become a pastoral and civilized people…”
Tribal rights established as of the date that the federal government created a given reservation. Tribes almost always possess seniority rights to those of most other current users
Tribal rights cannot be forfeited by non-use, unlike rights held under state law according to the principle of “prior appropriation”
Although the scope of these rights is sometimes quantified as the amount of water necessary to support the practically irrigable acreage on a reservation, once quantified, tribal water can be used for non-agricultural purposes
Tribal rights involve future needs, not just present reservation needs
Improvement of Nature
The National Reclamation (Newlands) Act of 1902 authorized the Secretary of the Interior to designate irrigation sites and to establish a reclamation fund from the sale of public lands to finance irrigation projects
Construction/maintenance costs were to be repaid through land sales and water charges to farmers on these projects. There is now an indefinite time that the farmers have to repay the costs. Many farmers have not paid it back because they just don’t have the steady income to do so.
By the 1920s, Reclamation Act had brought 9.2 million acres of land under cultivation in 17 western states
According to one study done in the 1980s, about 86% of the costs for construction and maintenance had not been repaid
In the American West, agriculture still uses around 86% of fresh water in the desert
By 1904, Los Angeles had a population of around 200,000 and needed a larger water supply to continue growing
In 1905, William Mulholland and Los Angeles Mayor Fred Eaton began purchasing land and water rights in the Owens Valley, initially by leading sellers to believe that they were cattle ranchers or agents of the Bureau of Reclamation
Los Angeles grew from this with Mulholland as a hero for replacing a failed agricultural region with a growing, successful city
Divided Colorado River into upper basin (CO, NM, UT, WY) and lower basin (AZ, CA, NV)
Article III apportioned waters between Upper and Lower basins as follows
Both basins have perpetual right to “exclusive beneficial consumptive use” of 7.5 million acre-feet annually (15 million a-f total)
Lower Basin (with larger population) gets additional 1 million acre feet
Upper Basin cannot cause the river’s flow to fall below 75 million acre feet for any period of ten consecutive years
Upper basin states will not withhold water, and Lower Basin states will not demand water that cannot reasonably be applied to domestic and agricultural uses
Mexico would receive water pursuant to treaty, but only from surplus allocated to states; if surplus is insufficient, then Upper and Lower basins will share the burden of supplying Mexico’s apportionment (now 1.5 million a-f)
EC LaRue’s Water Supply Paper 395 (1916) estimated the Colorado’s average annual flow from 1895 to 1915 to be 16.2 million acre-feet
In 1934, the federal government began the Parker Dam construction project to divert Colorado River water to southern California. Arizona responded by mobilizing its National Guard and deploying the “Arizona Navy” (two ferry boats) to patrol the river.
Secretary of Interior Harold Ickes was only able to resume construction after promising Arizona a federal irrigation project of its own
Pollution is a collective action problem
Top US water polluters are mostly chemical companies
Cost incurred by a party who did not agree to the action causing the cost
Social costs to human health, environment
Pollution is the largest environmental threat to human health
Largest greenhouse gas polluters are large corporations
Point sources of water pollution
Factories
Wastewater treatment plant
Non-point sources of water pollution
Urban streets
Suburban development
Rural homes
Cropland
Animal feedlot
Employs various regulatory and non-regulatory tools to sharply reduce direct pollutant discharges into waterways, establish ambient water quality standards, finance municipal wastewater treatment facilities.
Regulates the discharge of pollutants into waters of the US
Point Source: CWA made it illegal to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waterways without a permit
Non-point source: CWA addressed pollutants from a non-point source through non regulatory means
Total maximum daily load to keep a water body meeting quality standards
TMDL = Sum of wasteload allocations (point sources) + sum of load allocations (nonpoint sources) + margin of safety
Traditionally navigable waterways
Interstate waters
Territorial seas
Impoundments of water
Tributary waters
Adjacent waters
Waters within the 100 year flood plain of traditional waterways, interstate waters, and territorial seas
Waters within 4000 feet of high tide line or ordinary high water mark of traditional waterways, interstate waters, or territorial seas
Redefined to “only those relatively permanent, standing, or continuously flowing”
Established minimum standards to protect tap water and requires all owners of public water systems to comply with these primary standards
Solving Water Pollution Problems
Precautionary Principle: if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus that the action or policy is not harmful, the burden of proof that is not
Internalize costs
Indigenous opposition to water/energy development projects must be understood in the broader context of Native American History and federal Indian policy - as sovereignty disputes and cultural issues as well as environmental problems. Climate change is a major concern but not the only concern.
Historically, indigenous nations have disproportionately absorbed many of the negative externalities created by American economic and energy development
Indigenous peoples can form, and have formed, coalitions with environmental groups and other local opponents of water/energy projects, but their interests are not necessarily identical. These coalitions are often fractious and ephemeral
Green energy development and sustainability should be measured by cultural and social metrics as well as economic and environmental metrics. Environmental justice is an important measure of whether a project is truly green
Water is power
The Dakota Access Pipeline was planned to go through Indigenous lands.
Many Indigenous people fought back in an attempt to prevent the pipeline from successfully being installed
They were worried about oil leaks getting into their waterways.
Lakota Indigenous People
Treaty of Fort Laramie established the Great Sioux Reservation encompassing the western half of South Dakota including black hills
Discovery of gold in the Black Hills caused pressure to cede additional lands in 1876 treaty
Land cessions in 1889 splintered reservation even farther
Lakotas fought against the US, lost
Pick Sloan Plan - built dams on Reservations for…
Flood Control
Navigation
Irrigation
Power Supply
Water Supply
Water Quality
Recreation
Fish and Wildlife
Oahe Dam
Flooded more than 160000 acres of tribal land and destroyed 90% of timberland on the Standing Rock Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux reservations, as well as the best rangeland, most cultivated areas, and the wild plant and game habitat
Aggravated poverty on reservations
DAPL went under Lake Oahe, so permit from Army Corps of Engineers necessary
Standing Rock
Protests against pipeline
Police brutality as a result of the protests
Sacred Foods of the Waasat Religion
Water, Salmon, Berries, Roots, Deer
Longhouse feasts begin and end with an invocation of Chuush followed by a sip of water because water is life
Many dams flooded Indigenous fisheries and village sites in the Columbia-Snake Basin and blocked upriver fish passage entirely
Pumped storage projects allow the banking of electricity generated by dams, windmills, and solar farms to supplement the grid when renewables cannot meet demand. Basically they are large batteries
Pushpum: Sacred site for Yakama Nation Ceremonies, Legends, and gathering of traditional roots and medicines
FERC…
Failed to consult with Yakama Nation
Failed to protect sensitive cultural information
Failed to assess alternatives (ie. locations)
Ignored the development’s large consumption of Columbia River water and impacts to fish, wildlife, streams, and wetlands
Look for the positives and recognize, celebrate, and build on incremental progress and accomplishments
We must value, protect, and manage what we have while also committing to resolve the problems
The rivers no longer burn
76% of wastewater received some level of treatment (42% of population)
60% of total wastewater safely treated (12% of population)
Reporting on Industrial Wastewater
Only 38% was treated
Only 27% was safely treated
Reporting on Household Wastewater
42% not safely treated before discharge
We now treat water in newer treatment systems instead of leaving it untreated in outhouses
Legal requirements, technological developments, incentives
Flint Water Crisis
Many people worked for a resolution
Government eventually stepped in to help
Access to water
We can recharge aquifers by understanding how water filters through soils
We can recharge aquifers also by using injection wells that add water back to the groundwater when not needed and pulling it out when needed.
Desalinization techniques allow access to ocean water as freshwater
Klamath River Dam
Used solely for power generation, not agriculture
Removal does not affect water rights
Provided electricity to 70000 households when active
Removal allows fish, allowing water quality
Original reservoirs provided recreation and tax revenue