A chemical synapse converts an electrical signal to a chemical signal and then back to electrical.
How are electrical events in the presynaptic terminal coupled to secretion of the neurotransmitter?
Experiments were conducted using the squid giant axon bundle and stellate ganglion, focusing on the squid giant synapse.
Katz and Miledi (1967) investigated the relationship between the presynaptic action potential and neurotransmitter (NT) release.
TTX (tetrodotoxin) was used to block Na+ channels gradually.
A minimum of 40mV depolarization in the presynaptic terminal is necessary for a postsynaptic response.
Normal fluxes of Na^+ and K^+ ions during the presynaptic action potential are not necessary for transmitter release; depolarization is sufficient to trigger release.
External Ca^{2+} is crucial for release (del Castillo and Katz).
In the squid axon, each action potential produces a small influx of Ca^{2+} through voltage-dependent Ca^{2+} channels (Hodgkin and Baker).
The remaining presynaptic current after application of TTX and TEA is carried by Ca^{2+} ions (Katz and Miledi).
Rodolfo Llinás conclusively proved Ca^{++} is necessary and sufficient to cause release.
Voltage-clamp the presynaptic terminal of the squid giant synapse in the presence of TTX and TEA.
Depolarization leads to Ca^{2+} influx and NT release.
Further depolarization (to Ca^{2+} equilibrium potential, E_{Ca^{++}}) results in no calcium influx and no NT release.
Simulating an action potential presynaptically allowed measurement of the time course of the Ca^{++} current.
Further evidence that presynaptic Ca^{++} is sufficient to induce release comes from studies with “caged” Ca^{++} (Zucker, 1993; Schneggenburger et al., 2002).
Glutamate Uncaging at the Calyx of Held was also used.
The Ca^{++}-Dependence of Release is Highly Non-Linear (Dodge & Rahaminoff, 1967; Schneggenburger & Neher, 2000).
The exponent is approximately 4.
Voltage-gated Ca^{++} channels are located directly opposite ACh receptors in the synaptic cleft.
Fluorescent conotoxin and bungarotoxin are used to visualize this.
Fatt and Katz in 1951 showed that using a low concentration of curare to partially block synaptic transmission at the frog neuromuscular junction allows for resolution of end plate potentials (EPPs), which precede muscle action potentials.
Fatt and Katz, 1952, made recordings in TTX that reveal spontaneous miniature EPPs (mEPPs) occur at the end plate (0.5-1mV).
The quantal hypothesis poses the question: Are the minis the building blocks of the EPP?
Quantal content (m) is the mean EPP size (V{avg}) divided by the mEPP, or quantal size (q): m = \frac{V{avg}}{q}.
Fatt and Katz proposed the Quantal Hypothesis: Single quantal events observed spontaneously represent the building blocks for the synaptic potentials evoked by stimulation.
Under conditions of low Ca^{++} and high Mg^{++} concentration, the magnitude of EPP fluctuates in a stepwise manner.
José del Castillo and Bernard Katz proposed a statistical model to describe the relationship between quanta and evoked release:
Does quantal release fit a Poisson distribution?
Evoked EPP amplitudes increase in a stepwise manner, indicating the size of the response increases in discrete “chunks” or quanta.
Amplitude histograms of mEPPs are made to analyze quantal size.
Observations include spontaneous events, control conditions, and effects of drugs A & B, including failures.
EM micrographs had shown “omega figures” in the presynaptic terminal, hypothesized to be vesicles in the act of fusing.
Heuser and Reese (1979) used “slam freezing” and “freeze fracturing” techniques to observe vesicles in the act of fusing.
Procedure: Stimulate nerve, Drop (~3 msec), Freeze (4°K).
Frog NMJ
Use 4-AP to enhance release
Freeze-fracture EM reveals ‘pits’ representing vesicles fusing. Vesicle openings match calculated # of quanta released!
Presynaptic Homeostasis at the Drosophila NMJ influences synaptic strength.
Key factors (presynaptic and postsynaptic):
Number of release sites/vesicles (N).
Action potential waveform.
Ca^{2+} channel #/ -function / -type.
Ca^{2+} buffering.
Vesicle – Ca^{2+} channel distance.
Ca^{2+} sensitivity.
Release site/active zone/vesicle #.
Release competence.
Neurotransmitter molecules/vesicle.
Neurotransmitter receptor #/-type.
Release probability (p)
Quantal size (q)
EPSP(C) = N \cdot p \cdot q
In synapses with high Pr, one needs to use a binomial model where: m=np.
m = quantal content.
n = quanta available for release (number of active zones).
p = average release probability.
Presynaptic Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity in fly NMJ (Grae Davis UCSF, Martin Müller U. Zurich).
Delvendahl and Müller, Curr Op. in Neuro. 2019
+Philanthotoxin (AMPA blocker)
When looking at minis, mini frequency reflects n, while mini size (q) reflects the amount of postsynaptic receptors.
In CNS synapses, quantal content is ~1, and the amount of NT released in a vesicle saturates the postsynaptic terminal.
Most CNS synapses have 1 active zone, but 1 axon can make several synapses onto one cell. n=3
Synaptic transmission is triggered by Ca^{++} flowing into the presynaptic terminal.
Neurotransmitter is released in multimolecular packets called quanta.
Each quanta results in a mini EPP, and the evoked response is composed of multiple quanta.
Each vesicle represents a single quanta.
Synaptic strength is a combination of pre and postsynaptic factors, each of which can be modulated to cause synaptic plasticity.
Here are some key terms related to synaptic transmission:
Neurotransmitter release
Presynaptic terminal
Postsynaptic response
Voltage-dependent Ca^{2+} channels
Quantal hypothesis
Miniature EPPs (mEPPs)
Quantal content
Vesicle hypothesis
Freeze fracturing
Presynaptic homeostasis
Release probability (p)
Quantal size (q)