Gains from trade
Production
Consumption
Workers’ Gain
Worker’s wage in home country: W = Pc / MPL or W = W/PC (Terms of cheese)
MPL = PC/aLC
Home Country Wage: $12 an hour
Foreign Country Wage: $4 an hour
Home’s exports: Cheese
alc = 1
½ = PC / PW
Foreign exports: Wine
alc = 3
2 = PW / PC
Free trade is beneficial only if a country is more productive than foreign countries.
Opportunity cost drives the need for free trade, not necessarily the productivity. Some people don’t want to give up certain products for a different one.
Free trade with countries that pay low wages hurts high wage countries.
While trade may reduce wages for some workers, thereby affecting the distribution of income within a country, trade benefits consumers and other workers.
Consumers benefit because they can purchase goods more cheaply.
Producers/Workers benefit by earning a higher income in the industries that use resources more efficiently, allowing them to earn higher prices and wages relative to no-trade.
Free trade exploits less productive countries whose workers make low wages.
The Ricardian model predicts that countries completely specialize in production.
Do we see that in reality?
This rarely happens for three main reasons
More than one factor of production reduces the tendency of specialization (Chapters 4 - 5)
Protectionism (Chapters 9 - 12)
Trump’s Tariffs being imposed is an example of protectionism.
Transportation costs reduce or prevent trade, which may cause each country to produce the same good or service.
Non-traded goods and services (haircuts/auto repairs) exist due to high transport costs.
Countries tend to spend a large fraction of national income on non-traded goods and services.
This fact has implications for the gravity model and for models that consider how income transfers across countries affect trade.
Do countries export those goods in which their productivity is relatively high?
Positively sloped line, export the goods you are relatively more productive in.
Relative productivity matters most in trade
The main implications of the Ricardian Model are well supported by empirical evidence
Productivity
differences play an important role in international trade
Comparative Advantage
Trade inequality
Some unequal distribution, some heads might lose their job.
Assumptions
H-O model only uses two factors of production, labor and capital
You are combining both. You can’t do something with just capital, you need someone to work that.
Only two goods are being traded. (Food & Cloth)
Only two countries, Home and Foreign
Identical Taste
Both countries
Same technology across both countries.
Not for both goods. We are assuming the same technology is present in both countries. For example: To make cloth is the same in both countries but to make cloth in one country is different than making food in a different country.
“The way you combine labor and capital to produce food at home is the same as foreign.” (The ratio)
Different relative factor endowments/stock.
Factor endowment/stock: total available quantity of labor and capital you have.
Ricardian Model
Just uses one factor of production, labor
Only two goods are being traded. (Cheese & Wine)
Only two countries, Home and Foreign
Identical Taste
Both countries
Labor productivity is constant.
Labor productivity varies from country to country.
Technology is different across sectors and countries.
Technology: Combing your inputs to make an output. Whatever you’re doing for that, could be the process for making it.
Comparative Advantage: When you can produce a good for less of an opportunity cost than another country.
Factor intensities: Ratio of labor to capital for a specific good.
Assumption about these: They are not equal for both goods.
Labor intensities for food ≠ labor intensities for clothing.
Home is relatively abundant in labor. Relatively scarce in capital.
I am research Sweden for my presentation.
Need to explain on each answer why that is the answer.
No Class 03/13/2025 for Midterm